


Ask the community...
A simpler way to think about "material participation" for your situation: 1. Are YOU the person providing the service/doing the work? Yes = material participation 2. Is someone else doing the work while you just collect money? No = material participation For consulting calls and market research, you're actively doing the work (participating in calls, giving feedback), so you're materially participating. This matters because materially participating means you can deduct losses against other income if you have more expenses than income. TurboTax makes this more complicated than it needs to be. Just say yes to material participation for your situation.
This explanation is super helpful, much clearer than what I was finding online! One more question - does this affect how I should be handling my home office deduction? I use a corner of my living room exclusively for these calls. Is that something I can still claim even though the hours are minimal?
For the home office deduction, the key requirement is regular and exclusive use of the space for business. If you're only using that corner of your living room for business calls and nothing else, you can claim it. However, the "regular use" part might be challenging if you only do 1-2 calls per month. The IRS doesn't define exactly how many hours constitute "regular" use, but sporadic use might be questioned. If you use the simplified method ($5 per square foot up to 300 sq ft), it's less likely to trigger scrutiny than claiming actual expenses for such minimal use.
I'm in the exact same situation! I make about $1200/year doing these research studies and always struggle with the "materially participate" question. Has anyone had an issue with TurboTax automatically categorizing this income differently depending on whether it was on a 1099-MISC vs 1099-NEC? Last year with the MISC form, it put it under "other income" but this year with NEC it wants me to do a whole Schedule C business thing?
That's because TurboTax is correctly following the IRS forms. Before 2020, non-employee compensation was reported in Box 7 of 1099-MISC and required Schedule C. Other types of payments on 1099-MISC (like prizes or awards) might go on "other income" line. Starting in 2020, the IRS moved non-employee compensation to the separate 1099-NEC form specifically to make this distinction clearer. If you received a 1099-NEC, that's definitely Schedule C business income that requires reporting as self-employment income, not "other income.
One thing nobody's mentioned yet - check if your Roth IRA is less than 5 years old. There's a 5-year rule that applies even to contribution withdrawals in some cases. If you established your first Roth IRA less than 5 years ago, that could potentially be why the distribution is being coded as taxable. Also, did you ever do a Roth conversion from a Traditional IRA? Those converted amounts have different 5-year rules for each conversion. The ordering rules say contributions come out first (tax-free), then conversions (potentially taxable if within 5 years), then earnings.
Thank you for mentioning this! I've actually had my Roth since 2018, so it's been over 5 years. And I've never done any conversions - all of my contributions were direct to the Roth IRA. Based on what everyone is saying, it really sounds like Fidelity just coded the 1099-R incorrectly. I'll contact them tomorrow to request a corrected form with the right distribution code. In the meantime, I'll fill out Form 8606 Part III to document that these were contribution withdrawals and therefore not taxable. This has been super helpful!
Glad to hear your account meets the 5-year requirement! That definitely makes things simpler. When you call Fidelity, specifically ask them to issue a corrected 1099-R with distribution code J in Box 7, which indicates an early distribution from a Roth IRA with no known exception. This is the correct code for withdrawal of contributions. Even if they take a while to issue the correction, go ahead and file with Form 8606 as you mentioned. If the IRS questions it, you'll have documentation showing these were return of contributions. Good luck!
I work at a financial firm (not Fidelity) and this happens ALL THE TIME. The problem is that the default code our systems use for distributions under age 59½ is code 1, and someone has to manually change it to code J for Roth contribution withdrawals. Many times the customer service rep processing the distribution doesn't properly code it. Pro tip: Next time you request a distribution, specifically tell them you're withdrawing only contributions and ask them to use code J on the 1099-R. Document who you spoke with and when. If they still get it wrong, request a corrected 1099-R right away.
Is there any penalty to the financial institution for issuing incorrect 1099s? Seems like they should be more careful since this directly impacts people's taxes!
There's no direct penalty to financial institutions for most 1099 errors unless they're systemic or intentional. The IRS recognizes that mistakes happen, which is why there's a process for issuing corrected forms. However, firms can face penalties for late filing or intentional misreporting. The bigger issue is that most large institutions use automated systems to generate these forms, and special situations like Roth contribution withdrawals often require manual intervention to code correctly. While annoying for customers, it's generally viewed as an administrative error rather than something that would trigger penalties.
Just a heads-up about the Tesla rewards situation - I had something similar happen with credit card rewards that were technically in my name but used by a family member. The IRS generally views rewards as rebates rather than taxable income unless they're earned without spending (like referral bonuses). If these are driving credits/supercharging rewards tied to actual Tesla usage, you might have an argument they're not taxable income but rather rebates on expenses. However, if they're referral bonuses or something similar where Tesla is required to issue a 1099-MISC, that's different. Also, consider that if your brother reimburses you for the tax impact, it's essentially neutral to you financially. You'd report the income but be made whole by your brother.
Has anyone used TurboTax to help figure out AGI reduction strategies? I'm finding their tool pretty limited when it comes to last-minute AGI reduction techniques and wondering if there's better software out there.
I've found TaxAct to be better than TurboTax for these kinds of situations. They have a better "what-if" analyzer that lets you test different scenarios to see how they impact your AGI. But honestly, for complex situations like trying to retroactively reduce AGI with specific targets in mind, software alone isn't enough - you really need a tax pro who understands all the available options.
My two cents as someone who's been in your shoes - FreeTaxUSA is totally capable of handling your situation. I've used it for my Etsy shop (about $1400 in sales last year) plus my W2 job for 3 years now. The interface isn't as pretty as TurboTax, but it asks all the same questions and covers all the same deductions at a fraction of the price. I tracked inventory similar to you and had no trouble entering everything correctly. One tip: before you file, print out a draft of your return and review it carefully. This helped me catch a couple small errors last year. If everything looks right and you have good documentation, your audit risk is super low. Save the CPA money for when your business grows substantially or gets more complex with employees, multiple sales channels, etc.
Thanks so much for sharing your experience! Have you ever had any issues with state filing through FreeTaxUSA? I've heard their federal is great but some people complained about the state portion.
I've done both federal and state with FreeTaxUSA with no issues at all. The state portion isn't free like the federal filing, but it's still way cheaper than TurboTax - I think I paid about $15 for state filing last year. The state section works exactly the same way as the federal part - straightforward questions and it imports all your relevant info from the federal return automatically. I'm in California which has some complex state tax rules, and it handled everything correctly. The software even flagged when I qualified for a specific state credit I didn't know about.
For a side business with less than $2k in revenue, FreeTaxUSA is more than sufficient if you're organized with your books. I've used them for years with my photography side hustle. Don't stress about audits for such a small operation - they're extremely rare at your income level. The IRS is much more interested in businesses with unusual deductions or large cash transactions.
This is what I keep telling my friend! She made like $700 on Etsy last year and is freaking out about getting audited. It's just not worth the IRS's time to go after such small amounts unless you're doing something really weird with your deductions.
Landon Flounder
Have you considered just starting over with a clean QuickBooks file? For my lawn care business, when I had a similar issue last year, I found it easier to export all my transactions to Excel, remove the duplicates there, and then import the clean data back into a fresh QuickBooks company file. It took a few hours but was actually less frustrating than trying to fix it in QuickBooks directly. If you go this route, make sure you reconcile your accounts before and after to ensure everything matches up. Also, keep your old QBO file as a backup. This approach worked well for me for Schedule C filing.
0 coins
Callum Savage
ā¢Wouldn't that mess up all your existing categorizations and receipt attachments? I have about 300+ transactions with receipts carefully attached and categorized for tax purposes. Starting over sounds terrifying.
0 coins
Landon Flounder
ā¢You're right to be concerned about losing attachments. The export/import method works best if you haven't attached many receipts yet. In your case with 300+ transactions with attachments, I'd definitely go with the selective deletion approach instead. If you do need to delete transactions one by one, a time-saving tip is to open two browser windows side by side - one showing your bank's actual transactions and the other showing your QuickBooks register. This makes it easier to quickly identify which entries are the duplicates as you go through them.
0 coins
Ally Tailer
Has anyone used the QuickBooks Audit Log to help with this? I had a similar issue and found that looking at the audit log helped me identify which transactions were manually entered vs. automatically imported. The manually entered ones usually showed up as "Created by [your name]" while the imported ones showed "Created by Bank Feed." This made it much easier to figure out which set to keep. For Schedule C purposes, I kept the bank feed ones since they had the exact transaction dates from the bank rather than when I manually entered them.
0 coins
Aliyah Debovski
ā¢This is brilliant! I just checked my audit log and can clearly see which transactions I entered manually vs which came through the bank feed. This will make cleanup so much faster. Does anyone know if there's a way to filter the audit log to only show transaction creations?
0 coins