


Ask the community...
With a 7-figure tax bill, have you considered family office services? Several wealth management firms offer comprehensive tax strategy as part of their family office packages. They coordinate everything including working with your existing CPA. We made the switch two years ago and our tax rate dropped by 6% the first year. They implemented strategies around timing of income recognition, charitable remainder trusts, and opportunity zone investments that our CPA had never suggested.
Family office services usually require $100M+ in assets though, right? Or are there more accessible options for the mere $10-50M crowd?
Based on your situation, I'd strongly recommend going the tax strategist route rather than switching CPAs again. You're absolutely right that the constant CPA churn is counterproductive - it takes them forever to understand complex structures, and you lose all that institutional knowledge each time. A good tax strategist will work collaboratively with your current CPA. Think of it as division of labor: the strategist identifies opportunities and creates the roadmap, your CPA handles the compliance and execution. This way you keep the relationship that already understands your entity structure while adding the proactive planning piece that's missing. With your effective rate climbing from 20% to 32% and a 7-figure tax bill, even a modest improvement could easily justify the strategist's fees. Look for someone who specializes in equity investments and multi-entity structures specifically - they should be able to show you concrete examples of strategies they've implemented for similar clients. The key is finding someone who provides detailed implementation guidance with IRS code citations, not just vague suggestions. Your CPA will be much more receptive to executing strategies when they have clear legal backing and step-by-step instructions.
has anyone ever had their wfh stipend audited? i'm getting $200/mo but honestly my internet is only $65 and i don't really spend much on supplies. kinda worried im going to get in trouble someday but also my company doesn't ask for receipts?
If your company doesn't ask for receipts and just adds the stipend to your paycheck, it's almost certainly being treated as taxable income. In that case, you don't need to worry about an audit related to those expenses - the money is already being taxed as regular income. It would be like worrying about getting audited for how you spend your salary.
This is such a timely question! I'm dealing with something similar and want to share what I've learned through research and talking to my HR department. The key thing to understand is that there are really two different approaches companies can take with WFH stipends, and they have very different tax implications: 1. **Taxable stipend/allowance**: The company just adds the money to your paycheck. This gets taxed as regular income, and since most of us are W-2 employees, we can't deduct the home office expenses to offset it (thanks to the TCJA changes through 2025). 2. **Accountable plan reimbursement**: You submit receipts/documentation for actual expenses, and the company reimburses you. This isn't considered taxable income. To figure out which one you have, look at your paystub. If you see the $250 listed in your gross wages, it's option 1. If it doesn't appear there at all, your company likely has an accountable plan set up. One thing I'd recommend is keeping detailed records of your actual home office expenses regardless of how your company handles it. Even if you can't deduct them now as a W-2 employee, it's good documentation to have, and tax laws could change in the future. Plus, if you ever transition to freelance/contract work, you'll want that history!
Has anyone figured out if this issue exists in TaxSlayer or H&R Block software too? I've been using FreeTaxUSA for personal returns but was planning to use TaxSlayer for my S-Corp this year.
I used H&R Block last year for my S-Corp and ran into the exact same issue with SEHI deduction and APTC repayment. It seems like TurboTax is the only one that automatically handles this calculation correctly. I ended up having to manually adjust the QBI amount in H&R Block software too.
Thanks for the info. Sounds like most tax software has this issue except TurboTax. I'm still going to try TaxSlayer this year since it's significantly cheaper, but I'll keep careful track of my SEHI deduction and make manual adjustments if needed.
This is a really helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar SEHI deduction issue as an S-Corp owner. Just to clarify - when you manually entered the APTC repayment amount in the S Corp Health Insurance Premiums field, did you enter the full APTC repayment amount, or did you have to calculate some percentage of it? I'm trying to figure out if the entire APTC repayment becomes eligible for SEHI deduction, or if there's additional calculation needed based on the number of months covered or income levels. My APTC repayment was about $1,800 but I want to make sure I'm not claiming more SEHI deduction than I'm actually entitled to. Also, for anyone who's been through an audit - do you know if the IRS typically scrutinizes SEHI deductions heavily when they're manually entered like this instead of being automatically calculated by the software?
Great question about the APTC repayment calculation! You typically can't just use the full APTC repayment amount as your SEHI deduction - there are some important limitations to consider. The SEHI deduction is capped at the lesser of: (1) the actual premiums you paid, or (2) your net self-employment income. So if your APTC repayment was $1,800, you need to make sure you actually paid at least that much in health insurance premiums during the tax year, and that your S-Corp income supports that deduction amount. Also, the SEHI deduction is calculated on a monthly basis - you can only deduct premiums for months when you weren't eligible for employer-sponsored coverage (including coverage through a spouse's employer). So you might need to prorate the amount based on eligible months. Regarding audits, I haven't been through one personally, but from what I understand, the IRS does pay attention to SEHI deductions, especially when they're large relative to income or when there are APTC complications involved. The key is having good documentation - keep records of your actual premium payments, APTC statements, and calculations showing how you arrived at your deduction amount. As long as you can substantiate the deduction with proper documentation, you should be fine.
Just an FYI - the Final Notice to Pay (CP90/Letter 1058) gives you the right to request a Collection Due Process hearing within 30 days. This can buy you time to get everything in order and also gives you appeal rights if you disagree with anything. File Form 12153 to request the hearing. While the hearing is pending, they can't levy your assets (though liens may still be filed). It's a legitimate way to pause collections while you get your missing returns filed and set up a payment plan.
Based on everyone's experiences here, it sounds like you're at a critical juncture but you still have options. The fact that you're now financially able to address this is huge - many people dealing with Final Notices don't have that advantage. Your immediate priorities should be: 1) Get those missing returns filed within the 30-day window (even if they're not perfect), 2) Call the IRS to let them know you're actively working on compliance, and 3) Consider requesting a Collection Due Process hearing using Form 12153 to buy yourself time if needed. Don't let the TurboTax issues derail you - if you can afford a CPA now, that's probably your best bet for getting accurate returns filed quickly. The IRS cares more about having something on file than perfection at this stage. The key is showing good faith effort before that 30-day deadline hits. Once you're filing compliant and have the returns submitted, the payment plan options everyone mentioned become available. Stay proactive and you should be able to avoid the levy nightmare that some others described.
Chloe Martin
This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation where we have a client who changed their plan year mid-stream, resulting in both a short plan year (5 months) and a full plan year that need to be reported on the same Form 720. One thing I wanted to add that hasn't been mentioned yet - make sure you're also keeping detailed records of which calculation method you used for each period and why. We had an audit a few years back where the IRS wanted to see our justification for choosing the snapshot method versus actual count method, especially for the shorter period. Also, if you're using different methods for each period (which is allowed), document that clearly. For example, we used actual count for our short plan year because we had complete monthly data, but snapshot for the full year due to some data gaps. The IRS was fine with this approach as long as we could show our reasoning. The documentation suggestion from ApolloJackson about attaching an explanation sheet is spot on - it saved us a lot of back-and-forth when questions came up later.
0 coins
Natasha Volkova
ā¢This is really valuable advice about documentation! I'm new to handling PCORI fees and hadn't thought about justifying the calculation method choices. Quick question - when you say you used different methods for each period, did you have to explain why the data limitations were different between the short and full plan years? I'm wondering if the IRS expects consistency in methodology or if they're okay with using whatever works best for each specific period.
0 coins
StellarSurfer
ā¢Great question! The IRS is actually quite flexible about using different calculation methods for different periods, as long as you can justify why each method was most appropriate for that specific situation. In our case, we explained that for the short plan year, we had complete monthly enrollment records from our new system, making the actual count method straightforward and accurate. However, for the full plan year, we had some months where the data was incomplete due to a system transition, so the snapshot method was more reliable. The key is documenting your reasoning clearly. We included a brief explanation like "Short plan year: Used actual count method due to complete monthly enrollment data availability. Full plan year: Used snapshot method due to data gaps in months 3-5 caused by system migration." The auditor appreciated the transparency and had no issues with the mixed approach. The IRS guidance actually encourages using whichever method gives you the most accurate count for each period, so don't feel locked into one approach across all periods if your data situation varies.
0 coins
Freya Nielsen
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar scenario where our client has both a 6-month short plan year and a full 12-month plan year that need to be reported together. One additional consideration I wanted to mention - if you're working with a self-funded client like the original poster, make sure they understand the payment timing. Even though you're filing both periods on the same Form 720, the payment is still due by July 31st for both periods. I've seen clients get confused thinking they have separate due dates for each plan year period. Also, for anyone using the snapshot method for their calculations, remember that you need to pick consistent dates within each plan year period. So if you're taking snapshots on the 15th of each month for your full plan year, stick with the 15th for all months in that period, and then you can choose different snapshot dates for the short plan year if that works better with your data. The advice about detailed documentation is spot on - I always create a simple spreadsheet showing the calculation for each period separately, then attach it to the Form 720. It makes everything much clearer if questions arise later.
0 coins