IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Question for anyone who's gone through this - did you use a CPA or just tax software for catching up on multiple years? I'm in a similar boat (5 unfiled years) and wondering if it's worth paying a professional or if software is good enough for straightforward W-2 income.

0 coins

I used TurboTax for my backlog of 4 years and it worked fine since I just had W-2s. Just had to buy the previous year versions. Was way cheaper than a CPA. Like $60 per year instead of hundreds.

0 coins

Lourdes Fox

•

Miguel, I was in almost the exact same situation as you about 2 years ago - 7 unfiled years, also went through a divorce that triggered the whole mess. The good news is that since you've had taxes withheld and likely qualify for refunds, you're not going to face the scary penalties that people who owe money get hit with. Here's what worked for me: Start with the most recent 3 years FIRST since those are the only ones where you can still claim refunds. I used FreeTaxUSA for the older years since they have previous year software available for cheap (like $15 per state return). For the really old years where you've lost the refund window, you still need to file them but there's less urgency. Don't stress about hiring a tax attorney - that's overkill for your situation. A CPA could help but honestly if it's just W-2 income, you can handle this yourself. The IRS is actually pretty reasonable when you're catching up voluntarily and not hiding from them. The hardest part is just starting. Once you file that first return, the momentum builds and it gets easier. You've got this!

0 coins

Thank you so much for sharing your experience! It's really reassuring to hear from someone who went through almost the exact same thing. The divorce trigger is so real - it's like everything else just falls apart when you're dealing with that stress. Quick question - when you say FreeTaxUSA has previous year software, do they go back all 8 years or is there a limit? And did you have any issues with the IRS when you finally submitted everything? I keep imagining them flagging my account or something scary like that. Really appreciate the encouragement about just starting. I think I've been so paralyzed by the size of the problem that I haven't taken any action at all.

0 coins

Kyle Wallace

•

My extension request last year wasn't accepted until April 17th (two days after the deadline) but I still didn't get any penalties because I submitted on April 14th. The IRS system gets super bogged down right at the deadline so delays are normal. Your submission date is what matters!!!!

0 coins

Ryder Ross

•

Thanks for sharing your experience! That's reassuring. Did you get any kind of confirmation email when you initially submitted the extension? I submitted mine but only got a "we received your transmission" email, not an actual acceptance.

0 coins

Tyrone Hill

•

I went through this exact same panic last year! Filed my extension on April 14th through FreeTaxUSA and didn't get confirmation until April 18th. I was freaking out thinking I'd get hit with penalties, but everything turned out fine. The key thing to remember is that the IRS considers your extension "filed" the moment you hit submit, not when they send you confirmation. As long as you submitted before midnight on April 15th (which you did on April 13th), you're protected from the failure-to-file penalty. Since you included your estimated tax payment of $2,300 with the extension, you should also be protected from most late payment penalties. The IRS is pretty reasonable about this - they know their system gets overwhelmed right at the deadline. Keep your submission confirmation from TurboTax as proof of your filing date. That timestamp is gold if you ever need to dispute any penalties. You did everything right - try not to stress about it!

0 coins

Are incorporated contractors (C-corp/S-corp) losing opportunities to staffing agencies due to company classification preferences? [USA]

I've been running my own S-corporation for about 3 years now, working as an independent IT consultant. Recently I've noticed a disturbing trend where companies I used to contract with directly are now requiring all contractors to go through staffing agencies instead of hiring incorporated contractors like myself. Last month, I got turned down for a project I was perfect for because the client said their new policy was "agency contractors only" - even though I have my own corporation with proper insurance, compliance, etc. When I explained that my S-corp status should address their classification concerns, they seemed confused about the distinction. It feels like there's this weird gray area where companies don't understand that independent contractors who operate through their own corporation (C-corp or S-corp) actually provide the same or BETTER classification protection than a staffing agency middleman. Meanwhile, these agencies take a massive cut (sometimes 30-40%!) of what would otherwise be my billing rate. I'm wondering if other incorporated contractors are experiencing this or if it's just my industry? Are these companies just not educated on the difference between a sole proprietor/LLC contractor (which might have classification risks) versus incorporated contractors who are employees of their own corp? Seems like they're missing out on great talent while paying more than necessary just because they don't understand the distinction.

Amun-Ra Azra

•

Has anyone successfully used the "Reasonable Basis" safe harbor protection for their S-corp contractor status? My accountant mentioned this as a way to strengthen my classification position with potential clients, but I'm not sure how to effectively communicate this to companies that seem set on using staffing agencies.

0 coins

Isabel Vega

•

The "Reasonable Basis" safe harbor can definitely strengthen your position, but it's not a simple concept to explain to clients. It essentially means that if you have a reasonable basis for treating workers as independent contractors (like following industry practice or relying on past IRS audits), you get additional protection. For S-corps specifically, there's substantial precedent supporting the classification distinction. I've had success creating a simple one-page addendum to proposals that specifically references Section 530 of the Revenue Act and how it applies to incorporated contractors with their own employees (even if that employee is just you as the owner). Including relevant case citations shows you've done your homework.

0 coins

Amun-Ra Azra

•

That's really helpful, thanks! I'll work with my accountant to put together something similar. Do you find that this approach works better with smaller companies or is it effective with larger corporations too?

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

This is such a frustrating trend that's affecting a lot of us incorporated contractors. I've been dealing with the same issue with my C-corp consulting business - companies that used to hire me directly now insist on going through agencies, even when I can demonstrate that my corporate structure actually provides better classification protection than many agency arrangements. What's particularly maddening is that these companies end up paying MORE for the same work (agency markup + my rate) while getting less direct communication and flexibility. I've started including a brief "Independent Contractor Classification FAQ" with my proposals that explains how incorporated contractors differ from sole proprietors in terms of classification risk, but it's an uphill battle against blanket policies. The education aspect is key - most hiring managers genuinely don't understand that when you're working through your own S-corp or C-corp, you're technically an employee of your corporation, which creates the separation they're looking for. Has anyone had success getting procurement or legal departments to review and approve exceptions to "agency-only" policies?

0 coins

Ayla Kumar

•

Another aspect to consider is whether your bracelets have a message or theme that ties directly to your exempt purpose. The "substantially related" test looks at whether the activity contributes importantly to accomplishing your exempt purpose (other than just through generating income). For example, if you're an environmental nonprofit and the bracelets say "Save the Oceans" and include educational info about ocean conservation, that strengthens your case that they're related to your exempt purpose. But if they're generic bracelets that don't tie to your mission, that's harder to defend. Also worth noting that net income from the activity matters too - if you're barely breaking even on the bracelets, the IRS is less likely to be concerned even if it might technically be unrelated business income.

0 coins

Mason Lopez

•

Thanks for this insight! Yes, our bracelets have our organization's name and this year's event theme which is directly tied to our mission of supporting literacy in underserved communities. The bracelet says "Read Together 2025" which is our campaign slogan. We're expecting to make roughly $4,500 from the sales (charging $15 for bracelets that cost us $5 to make). Would an amount like that even be worth the IRS's attention? I've heard there might be some minimum threshold before they care.

0 coins

Ayla Kumar

•

That messaging connection to your literacy mission definitely strengthens your position that this is substantially related to your exempt purpose. The bracelets are promoting your specific campaign and mission, not just generic merchandise. Regarding the amount, there is a reporting threshold - you only need to file Form 990-T if your gross unrelated business income is $1,000 or more. However, that's a moot point if the activity qualifies as related to your exempt purpose, which yours seems to. The $4,500 profit margin isn't large enough to likely trigger special scrutiny, but it's always the nature of the activity rather than the amount that determines if UBIT applies.

0 coins

Don't forget about the fragmentation rule with UBIT! The IRS will look at each activity separately, not your organization as a whole. So even if 99% of what you do is clearly related to your exempt purpose, that 1% unrelated activity could still trigger UBIT. Also, there's a misconception that if you use the profits for your exempt purpose, it exempts you from UBIT. That's not true - it's about the nature of the activity generating the income, not what you do with the proceeds.

0 coins

Is there a specific percentage of total income that nonprofits should stay under to avoid UBIT becoming an issue? Like if this bracelet fundraiser is less than 10% of their total annual revenue, does that make it less likely for the IRS to care?

0 coins

There isn't really a specific percentage threshold that creates a "safe harbor" from UBIT. The IRS evaluates each unrelated business activity on its own merits regardless of what percentage of total revenue it represents. However, you're right that smaller amounts tend to get less scrutiny in practice. The key factors are still: 1) Is it regularly carried on? 2) Is it substantially related to your exempt purpose? 3) Does it meet any specific exceptions? What matters more than the percentage is documenting why the activity IS related to your exempt purpose. In Mason's case with literacy-focused bracelets saying "Read Together 2025," that's a much stronger position than if they were selling generic merchandise that happened to raise money for literacy programs. The fragmentation rule Lorenzo mentioned is important though - even small unrelated activities can technically trigger UBIT if they don't qualify for an exception, regardless of your organization's overall mission focus.

0 coins

This is so frustrating but unfortunately pretty common. I went through the same thing last year - transcript showed my deposit date but nothing appeared for over a week. In my case, it turned out my bank was doing additional verification on the deposit because it was a larger amount than usual. Have you tried calling your bank and specifically asking if they have any pending ACH deposits or if there are any holds on your account? Sometimes they don't see pending deposits in their regular system but can find them if they look specifically for ACH transfers. Also, keep checking your transcript daily - if any new codes appear (especially 570 or 971), that could explain the delay. The waiting is the worst part, but most of the time it does eventually show up.

0 coins

Mason Stone

•

This is really helpful advice! I never thought to specifically ask my bank about ACH transfers - when I called them before I just asked about "pending deposits" in general. I'm going to call them back tomorrow and use those exact words. The waiting really is the worst part because you start imagining all these worst-case scenarios. Thanks for sharing your experience, it makes me feel less alone in this situation!

0 coins

Sofia Perez

•

I went through this exact same situation two months ago! My transcript showed a 2/12 deposit date but nothing hit my account until 2/20. What really helped me was understanding that the IRS "scheduled date" is when they release the funds to the Treasury, but then it goes through several processing steps before it actually reaches your bank account. The Treasury has to process it, then send it through the ACH network, and then your bank processes it on their end. Each step can add 1-2 business days. Since your transcript still shows 3/15 with no hold codes, you're probably just caught in this normal processing delay. I'd give it until Friday before getting worried - and definitely don't panic yet! The money is coming, it's just taking the scenic route through the banking system.

0 coins

Prev1...32443245324632473248...5643Next