


Ask the community...
Don't forget you can also potentially deduct a portion of your cell phone bill since you need it for the app, any car accessories specifically for delivery (phone mount, hot bags, etc), and even part of your car insurance if the vehicle is used significantly for business. I save all my receipts in a folder on my phone labeled by month.
How much of your cell phone bill can you deduct? Is it just a random percentage or do you need to calculate exactly how much is used for DoorDash?
You need to calculate the business use percentage of your phone. Keep track of how many hours you use your phone for DoorDash versus personal use over a typical week or month. For example, if you spend 20 hours a week doing deliveries and use your phone 40 hours total per week, you could potentially deduct 50% of your phone bill. The IRS wants you to be reasonable and have some method behind your calculation - you can't just pick an arbitrary percentage. I usually estimate based on my active delivery hours compared to my total phone usage time.
One more thing to add that's been really helpful for me - if you're using your personal vehicle for DoorDash, consider opening a separate checking account just for your gig work income and expenses. I deposit all my DoorDash earnings there and pay for gas, car maintenance, and other delivery-related expenses from that same account. It makes tracking everything SO much easier come tax time, and if you ever get audited, having that clear separation between personal and business finances looks really professional to the IRS. Also, since you mentioned you're trying to save for a car - keep in mind that if you end up buying a vehicle that you use primarily for deliveries, you might be able to deduct the depreciation instead of using the standard mileage rate. Something to research once you get to that point!
I've been through a very similar situation as an F1 student who got married while on OPT! Your tax consultant's advice is concerning and potentially dangerous for your immigration status. As others have mentioned, you cannot simply "choose" to file as residents when you're both on F1 visas and haven't met the substantial presence test. The only elections that allow non-residents to be treated as residents for tax purposes (like Section 6013(g) or the First-Year Choice Election) require at least one spouse to be a US citizen or resident alien already. What's particularly worrying is that filing incorrectly as residents when you don't qualify could trigger an audit and potentially create problems with USCIS when you apply for future immigration benefits like H1B or green card applications. Immigration officers do review tax filing history during these processes. Here's what I learned from my experience: stick with filing separate 1040NR forms as non-resident aliens. Yes, you'll miss out on joint filing benefits and education credits, but you can still claim the tuition and fees deduction on Form 8917. It's not as valuable as the credits, but it's legitimate and safe. I'd strongly recommend consulting with your university's international student services office - they often have tax advisors who specialize in F1 visa situations and can refer you to qualified CPAs who understand both tax law and immigration implications. Don't let a tax preparer's incorrect advice jeopardize your future immigration status for some potential tax savings.
Thank you so much for sharing your experience! This is incredibly helpful and reassuring to hear from someone who's been through the exact same situation. Your point about immigration officers reviewing tax filing history during future applications is something I hadn't even considered - that's a really important perspective. I'm definitely going to reach out to our university's international student services office first thing Monday morning. It sounds like getting proper guidance from someone who understands both the tax and immigration implications is crucial here. Quick question - when you filed separately as non-residents, were you able to claim the tuition deduction for both you and your spouse's educational expenses, or can each person only claim their own? And did you run into any issues with the IRS questioning your filing status since you were married but filing separately? I really appreciate everyone's advice in this thread. It's clear that our tax consultant either doesn't understand F1 visa rules or was being overly aggressive with their recommendations. Better to be safe and compliant than risk our future immigration status!
I'm a tax professional who works extensively with international students, and I want to echo the excellent advice already given here while adding a few critical points. First, your tax consultant's suggestion that you can "choose" to file as residents without meeting the substantial presence test is absolutely incorrect and potentially harmful. As F1 students, you're both considered "exempt individuals" for your first 5 calendar years, meaning those days don't count toward the substantial presence test regardless of how long you've been here. The only way married couples can elect resident status when one or both are non-residents is through Section 6013(g) or (h) elections, which require at least one spouse to be a US citizen or lawful permanent resident. Since you're both on F1 visas, these don't apply to your situation. Regarding your specific concerns about Social Security and Medicare taxes - you're correct to be worried. F1 students and OPT participants are exempt from FICA taxes when working in positions related to their studies. However, if you incorrectly file as residents, you could potentially become liable for these taxes retroactively, creating a significant financial burden. More importantly, filing an incorrect return claiming resident status when you don't qualify could create serious problems with USCIS during future immigration processes. They do review tax compliance history when evaluating applications for status changes, extensions, or permanent residence. My recommendation: file separate Form 1040NR returns as non-resident aliens. While you'll miss out on joint filing benefits and education credits, you can still claim legitimate deductions like qualified tuition expenses using Form 8917. It's worth consulting with your university's international student office - they often have relationships with CPAs who specialize in F1 tax issues and understand the immigration implications. Don't let potential short-term tax savings jeopardize your long-term immigration goals. The rules exist for a reason, and following them correctly protects your future in the US.
This is exactly the professional perspective I needed to hear! Thank you for taking the time to provide such detailed guidance. Your explanation about the FICA tax implications really drives home why getting this wrong could be so costly - not just from a tax perspective but potentially affecting our immigration status too. I'm definitely convinced now that our tax consultant was giving us dangerous advice. The fact that they didn't even mention the 5-year exempt individual rule or the specific requirements for the Section 6013 elections shows they don't really understand F1 visa taxation. I'll be contacting our university's international student office tomorrow to get a referral to a CPA who specializes in these situations. Better to pay a bit more for proper advice than risk our entire future in the US for some short-term tax savings. One last question - when we do eventually qualify as residents after the 5-year period, will we need to file any special forms or elections to make that transition, or does it happen automatically once we meet the substantial presence test?
I just want to echo what everyone has said here - you're definitely on the right track! As someone who works in payroll, I can confirm that Box 14 entries like yours are super common and your employer has handled everything correctly. Your company vehicle benefit of $8,200 is exactly what it sounds like - the taxable value of your personal use of the work truck. Your employer calculated this based on the mileage logs you submitted and already included it in your Box 1 wages. Box 14 is just showing you the breakdown so you understand why your taxable wages might seem higher than your base salary. The Med/Dental amount represents your pre-tax health insurance contributions that were deducted from your pay before calculating taxes. This money was never taxed, which is why it's excluded from your Box 1 wages. For the gift card, your employer had to "gross up" the value to cover the taxes (hence the $190 vs $185), then include it as taxable income. The fact that it shows in Box 14 means they've already handled the tax implications. In TurboTax, just enter these items exactly as shown on your W2. The software recognizes these common entries and won't double-count anything. You're doing great for your first year filing solo!
This is exactly the kind of expert insight that helps so much! Having someone who actually works in payroll confirm that everything looks normal is really reassuring. I was getting nervous about the "gross up" concept with the gift card, but your explanation makes it crystal clear - they added $5 to cover the taxes I'd owe on the gift card value, then made sure I paid taxes on the full $190. It's actually pretty thoughtful of employers to handle it that way so employees don't get surprised by unexpected tax bills. Thanks for taking the time to break this down from the payroll perspective!
As a newcomer to this community, I just wanted to say thank you to everyone who has shared their experiences with Box 14 entries! I'm in a very similar situation to Anderson - this is my first year filing my own taxes and I have a company vehicle benefit showing up in Box 14 that had me completely confused. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful. The explanation about how the company vehicle value is already included in Box 1 wages makes so much sense now. I was worried I'd have to report it as additional income somewhere else on my return. I also appreciate the practical tips about double-checking that the Box 14 amounts match your final paystub and using the exact descriptions when entering items in TurboTax. These are the kinds of details that aren't obvious when you're doing this for the first time. It's reassuring to see that Box 14 entries are pretty standard and that tax software like TurboTax is designed to handle them correctly. The community here seems really knowledgeable and supportive for people navigating tax questions!
Welcome to the community, Anthony! I'm also pretty new here and just went through the exact same confusion with Box 14 items on my W2. It's such a relief to find a community where people are willing to share their experiences and help each other out with these tax questions. What really helped me was taking everyone's advice about comparing my Box 1 wages to my actual salary - seeing that difference match the company vehicle amount in Box 14 was like a lightbulb moment. It finally clicked that my employer had already done all the heavy lifting on the tax calculations. I'd definitely recommend following the suggestion about checking your final paystub against your W2 amounts too. Even though most employers get it right, it's good to verify everything matches up before filing. Good luck with your first solo tax filing! From everything I've learned here, it sounds like we're both in pretty straightforward situations once you understand how Box 14 works.
I think everyone's overthinking this. I just have my employer split my direct deposit - main portion goes to checking, then fixed amounts go to both my 401k and my IRA. Super simple and I never "see" the money so I'm not tempted to spend it.
But that's not giving you the tax benefit OP is asking about! Your 401k contribution should be coming out pre-tax through your employer's plan, not as a direct deposit split. And sending money directly to your IRA this way doesn't give you any immediate tax advantage either - you're just automating what OP is already doing manually.
I'll add some clarity to the tax mechanics here since there's been some great discussion but a few key points could use emphasis. Lucy, you're absolutely right to be confused about the double taxation aspect - it's one of the most common misconceptions about Traditional IRAs. Here's the key: when you contribute to a Traditional IRA with after-tax dollars (money that's already hit your bank account), you get to deduct those contributions on your tax return, which essentially "gives back" the taxes you already paid on that money. So you're NOT getting double-taxed. However, given your $85k income and 401k participation, you're in the phase-out range for Traditional IRA deductions. This means you can only deduct a portion of your contributions, which significantly reduces the benefit. You might want to run the numbers on whether it's worth the complexity. One strategy to consider: max out your 401k first (you're only doing 6% currently), then if you have additional funds for retirement savings, consider a Roth IRA instead. Since your Traditional IRA deduction is limited anyway, the Roth gives you tax-free growth and withdrawals in retirement, plus more flexibility with early withdrawals if needed. The payroll direct deposit to your IRA is really just a convenience feature - it doesn't change the tax treatment at all compared to transferring from your bank account.
This is really helpful Lucas! I'm in a similar situation to Lucy and was also confused about the double taxation issue. Your explanation makes it much clearer - so the deduction essentially "undoes" the initial taxation. Given the phase-out limitations at that income level, would you recommend prioritizing the 401k match first, then maxing out the full 401k contribution before considering any IRA contributions? I'm wondering if there's a general rule of thumb for the order of retirement account priorities when you're in that middle-income range where some benefits start to phase out.
Crystal Singletary
This is the transcripts
0 coins
Tom Maxon
Code 150 - Tax Return Filed (Date: 08-12-2024; Amount: $1,127.00): This entry indicates that you filed and processed your tax return with a tax amount due of $1,127.00. Code 810 - Refund Freeze (Date: 02-08-2024; Amount: $0.00): This indicates that a freeze has been placed on any refund that may be due to you. This freeze could be due to various reasons such as review for accuracy, verification of information, or other compliance checks. The amount next to this code is typically $0.00 as it represents a status rather than a financial transaction. Code 766 - Credit to Your Account (Date: 04-15-2024; Amount: -$46,880.00): This is a substantial credit applied to your account. This could include withholding from wages, estimated tax payments, or other credits. The negative value indicates it's a credit to you. Code 768 - Earned Income Credit (Date: 04-15-2024; Amount: -$568.00): This shows the amount of Earned Income Credit (EIC) that was applied to your account. This credit is given to you if you are eligible and have low to moderate income from work. It is a refundable credit, meaning it can reduce the tax you owe and potentially increase your refund. Analysis and Next Steps The combination of credits listed under codes 766 and 768 significantly exceeds the tax assessed under code 150. However, the presence of the refund freeze (code 810) means that despite these credits, the IRS is not currently processing a refund for you. Since the freeze was initiated before the credits were applied, there might have been anticipation of issues with your tax return or the credits themselves that required additional scrutiny. Given the refund freeze and the lack of a code 846 (which would indicate a refund being issued), you should anticipate that the IRS may need more information or time to review the accuracy of your return or the eligibility for credits claimed. If you have not received any communication from the IRS explaining the refund freeze, it would be advisable for you to initiate contact to clarify the reasons for the hold and to understand if any additional steps are required from your side to resolve the issue. I made a video on how to bypass the usual IRS phone menu and long wait times here: https://youtu.be/UiAegRQ2Is8
0 coins
Sophia Clark
β’@Crystal Singletary I completely understand your anxiety with such a large refund amount! The verification process for $47k+ is definitely more intensive than usual, but completing that call was the biggest hurdle. Since you already spoke with them and got the 9-week timeline, you re'officially in their processing queue now. That timeframe starts from your verification call date, not your original filing. I d'recommend checking your transcript every Friday when they typically update - once that 810 code disappears you should see an 846 refund code appear pretty quickly. The wait is tough but you ve'done everything right. That s'an incredible refund coming your way!
0 coins
Sophie Duck
β’@Crystal Singletary I know this wait must feel endless with that amount! I went through verification for a much smaller refund last year and the anxiety was real. The good news is you ve'completed the hardest part - that verification call. With $47k+, they re'definitely being extra thorough but that 9-week timeline they gave you is usually pretty accurate. Just remember it counts from your verification call date, not when you originally filed. I d'join the Friday transcript checking routine everyone mentioned - that s'when updates typically happen. Once that 810 code disappears, you should see an 846 refund code appear within days. The waiting is brutal but you re'in their system now. Stay strong! πͺ
0 coins