


Ask the community...
I'm in my 3rd year as an agent and I don't even bother with the clothing deductions anymore. Focus on the big stuff instead: - Mileage (huge deduction, track EVERY showing) - Home office (if you have dedicated space) - Marketing (social media ads, flyers, photography) - Continuing education - E&O insurance - Desk fees - Technology (portion of phone, laptop, internet) These add up to WAY more than dry cleaning ever would, and they're all clearly allowed. Why risk an audit over dry cleaning when there are so many legitimate deductions available?
Does the home office deduction still trigger audits? My dad (accountant) always told me to avoid claiming it because it was a "red flag.
The home office deduction used to be more of an audit trigger years ago, but it's much safer now, especially for real estate agents who legitimately work from home. The IRS simplified the rules with the "simplified method" - you can deduct $5 per square foot up to 300 sq ft ($1,500 max) without having to calculate actual expenses or depreciation. Just make sure you're using the space exclusively for business. If your "home office" is also the guest bedroom or dining room table, that won't qualify. But if you have a dedicated space where you do administrative work, client calls, marketing, etc., it's a legitimate deduction that most agents should be taking advantage of. The key is documentation - take photos of your office setup and keep records of how you use the space. As long as it's legitimate, don't let old fears keep you from claiming valid deductions.
Great thread everyone! As someone who's been in real estate for about 5 years now, I can confirm what others have said - skip the dry cleaning deduction and focus on the big ones that actually matter. I learned this the hard way my first year when I spent hours trying to justify clothing expenses, only to have my CPA tell me it wasn't worth the risk. Now I focus on tracking: - Every single mile driven for business (this alone saved me about $4,000 last year) - All my marketing expenses including professional photos for listings - My MLS fees, lockbox fees, and board dues - Portion of my cell phone and internet since I use them for business - Business meals with clients (50% deductible) The mileage tracking especially adds up fast when you're showing properties all over town. I use an app that automatically tracks my trips and I just mark which ones were business-related at the end of each day. Don't get hung up on the small stuff like dry cleaning - there are so many legitimate deductions available to real estate agents that you'll easily make up for it with the safer options.
Has anyone tried contacting the Taxpayer Advocate Service about this issue? They're supposed to help with systemic problems in the tax code, and the outdated $5/sq ft rate seems to qualify.
I actually submitted a request to the Taxpayer Advocate Service about this exact issue last year! They were responsive and said they would include it in their annual report to Congress, which identifies issues that cause problems for taxpayers. They confirmed many people have complained about the outdated rate not keeping up with inflation or rising housing costs.
This is such a frustrating issue! I've been dealing with the same problem - using about 250 sq ft of my home office and watching my actual costs climb year after year while stuck with that same $1,250 deduction. What really gets me is that they adjust tax brackets, standard deductions, and plenty of other tax provisions for inflation, but somehow this one got forgotten. I think the key is getting more taxpayers to speak up about this. The Taxpayer Advocate Service suggestion is great - if enough people submit complaints about the same issue, it's more likely to get attention in their annual report to Congress. We could also try reaching out to small business organizations like NFIB or local chambers of commerce, since this affects so many self-employed people and small business owners who work from home. In the meantime, I'm definitely going to run the numbers on the regular method. If housing costs have doubled in many areas since 2013, it seems like a no-brainer that the actual expense method would come out ahead for most homeowners, even with the depreciation complications.
You're absolutely right about organizing taxpayers to speak up! I'm new to this community but I've been frustrated with the same issue for years. The fact that they adjust so many other tax provisions for inflation but left this one frozen is really unfair to home-based workers and small business owners. I'm definitely going to file a complaint with the Taxpayer Advocate Service - thanks to everyone who mentioned that option. And reaching out to small business organizations is a brilliant idea. The more voices they hear about this outdated rate, the better chance we have of getting it addressed. Has anyone here actually calculated what the rate should be if it had been indexed to inflation from the start? It would be helpful to have that data when contacting these organizations and representatives.
One thing to know about MFS that I learned the hard way - you both have to take standard deduction or both itemize, but you also both have to use the same method for itemizing. If one of you itemizes "the regular way" and the other itemizes "by detailed expenses," that's not allowed. The IRS website can be really confusing on this, so I recommend checking out the official instructions for Form 1040 and look at the MFS section specifically.
This thread has been incredibly enlightening! I've been in a similar MFS situation for three years and have been making the same mistake. Like many others here, I assumed that any deductions my spouse claimed meant we both had to itemize. After reading through all these responses, I realize I need to carefully review what my spouse is actually deducting. She has a small consulting business and has been putting those expenses on Schedule A as itemized deductions when they should probably be business expenses on Schedule C instead. The distinction between business expenses (Schedule C) and personal itemized deductions (Schedule A) seems to be the key that everyone was missing, including us. If her business expenses are properly categorized on Schedule C, then we might both be able to take the standard deduction and save thousands. I'm definitely going to look into some of the tools mentioned here to make sure we're categorizing everything correctly for our 2024 filing. This could be a game-changer for our tax situation!
Had this happen. Got confused too. Called my preparer. They explained it's not their check. It's from Treasury. Mail date means mail date. No early pickup. Mine took 6 days after mail date. Was driving me crazy. Needed it for rent. Next year doing direct deposit. Much faster. Hope yours comes quickly.
I understand the frustration with the timing! As someone who's dealt with quarterly estimated payments myself, here's what I've learned about managing this situation: The "check printed" status combined with a future mail date is actually the IRS giving you advance notice of when your refund will be mailed. This is helpful for planning purposes, even though you can't accelerate the process. For your quarterly payments as an independent contractor, consider these options: ⢠If your refund arrives after the quarterly deadline, you can still make the payment and potentially qualify for a penalty waiver if you meet safe harbor rules ⢠You could make the quarterly payment from other funds now and reimburse yourself when the refund arrives ⢠Many tax software programs and preparers can help calculate if you'll owe penalties for late quarterly payments The Treasury's direct mail system is secure but inflexible - there's simply no mechanism for early pickup. I switched to direct deposit after experiencing similar timing issues, and it's made quarterly payment planning much more predictable. The refund typically hits your account 1-2 days after the "sent" status appears. Hope your check arrives promptly on the 26th!
Miguel Diaz
Something to consider - if one of you makes significantly more than the other, you might want to adjust your withholding differently. When my wife and I got married, we found that we needed to withhold extra from the higher-earning spouse to avoid owing at tax time. Also, don't forget about that side job with tips! Tips are taxable income and if they're not withholding enough for those, you could end up with a surprise tax bill. I'd recommend putting a little extra withholding on that job's W-4.
0 coins
Amara Nwosu
ā¢Good point about the income difference! My side gig with tips is definitely the wild card here. How would you suggest calculating how much extra to withhold specifically for that job? Is there a general percentage that works well for tip income?
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
ā¢For tip income, a good rule of thumb is to set aside about 25-30% for taxes if nothing is being withheld from the tips currently. If you report your tips to your employer and they're withholding something already, you might still want to add a bit extra. The easiest approach would be to take your average weekly tips, multiply by 52 weeks, and then calculate 25% of that amount. Divide that by the number of pay periods in a year for that job, and you'll have a reasonable additional withholding amount to put on line 4(c) of your W-4 for that specific job.
0 coins
Zainab Ahmed
One thing nobody's mentioned - you can always adjust your W-4 throughout the year if you find the withholding isn't right! My husband and I got married last year and had to tweak our withholding twice before we got it right. You might consider starting conservative (slightly higher withholding) and then after a few months, use the IRS Withholding Estimator again to see if you're on track. Many people don't realize you can submit a new W-4 to your employer anytime your situation changes.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
ā¢How do you know if your withholding is on the right track during the year? Is there a way to check?
0 coins