IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Former tax preparer here. One important point nobody's mentioned - there's a BIG difference between business expenses and actual charitable donations on taxes. When MrBeast gives $10,000 to a random person on the street for a video, that's a BUSINESS EXPENSE (Schedule C), not a charitable donation. It's only a charitable donation if it goes to a qualified 501(c)(3) organization. Business expenses reduce your taxable income dollar-for-dollar, while charitable donations have limits and may not be as beneficial depending on your tax situation.

0 coins

Do these YouTubers actually save more on taxes by doing giveaways as business expenses versus if they just kept the money? I always hear people say "it's just for tax write-offs" but I don't understand how that would save them money overall.

0 coins

Ana Rusula

•

@Alexander Zeus No, business expense write-offs don t'actually save you more money than just keeping the cash. If a YouTuber is in a 30% tax bracket and spends $50K on a giveaway car, they save about $15K in taxes but they re'still out $35K net. The real benefit isn t'the tax savings - it s'that the giveaway video generates way more revenue than it costs. Like @Sebastian Scott mentioned, a $50K car giveaway might generate $100K+ in ad revenue, sponsorships, and increased subscriber value. So they re'not doing it primarily for tax benefits - they re'doing it because it s'profitable content that happens to also be tax deductible. The tax "write-off narrative" is kind of misleading. It s'really just smart business where the content creation costs including (giveaway items are) legitimately deductible because they re'necessary for producing the revenue-generating content.

0 coins

Raul Neal

•

Something I haven't seen mentioned yet is the reporting requirements for these giveaways. If you're a YouTuber giving away prizes worth $600 or more to any individual, you're generally required to issue a 1099-MISC form to the recipient and report it to the IRS. This means these creators need to collect personal information (name, address, SSN) from winners before giving them the prize. Many viewers don't realize this when they see these "spontaneous" giveaways to random people on the street. Also, for the creators, proper documentation is crucial. You need receipts, proof of delivery, records of the business purpose, and evidence that it was used in content creation. The IRS can challenge these deductions if they think the expenses are personal rather than business-related. The key test is whether the giveaway serves a legitimate business purpose (like creating content to generate revenue) versus being primarily personal generosity that happens to be filmed.

0 coins

This is really helpful context about the 1099 requirements! I never thought about how these "spontaneous" street giveaways would actually work logistically. Like when TomDoesGiveaways surprises some random person with a car, they'd have to get all their tax info before actually giving it to them? That must make those interactions way more complicated than what we see in the final video. Do you know if there are any penalties for creators who don't properly issue the 1099 forms, or if the IRS actually enforces this stuff regularly?

0 coins

Gabriel Ruiz

•

I've been following this discussion and wanted to add some perspective as someone who's dealt with similar situations. The consensus here is spot-on - your CPA's approach sounds very reasonable for your circumstances. One thing I'd emphasize that hasn't been mentioned much is the importance of consistency in your methodology. If you use the averaging approach for your real estate income this year, and you have a similar situation next year, stick with the same method unless there's a compelling reason to change. The IRS appreciates consistency in tax positions from year to year. Also, given that you're new to Form 2210AI, you might want to understand the "safe harbor" rules for estimated payments. For future years, if you pay either 100% of last year's tax liability (110% if your prior year AGI was over $150,000) in estimated payments, you can avoid penalties regardless of how much you owe when you file. This might be simpler than dealing with annualization if your income continues to be variable. Your 25% quarterly variation is really quite manageable, and combined with properly isolating that Q4 Roth conversion, you should be in good shape. The key takeaway is that you and your CPA approached this thoughtfully rather than just trying to game the system to minimize penalties.

0 coins

This is such valuable information about the safe harbor rules! I hadn't really understood that option before reading your explanation. It sounds like for someone in my situation with variable income, paying 100% of last year's tax liability might actually be the simpler path forward rather than trying to perfectly time estimated payments with my unpredictable real estate commissions. The point about consistency in methodology is also really helpful - I can see how switching approaches from year to year could raise red flags even if each individual approach was reasonable. Thanks for sharing this broader perspective on managing estimated payments for variable income situations!

0 coins

This has been such an informative discussion! As someone who's also navigating Form 2210AI for the first time, I really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences and expertise. One thing I'm curious about - for those of you who've been through audits where the IRS questioned your 2210AI allocations, how detailed did they get in their review? Did they want to see every single commission check and closing statement, or were they more focused on whether your overall methodology made sense? I'm in a similar boat as the original poster with variable income (though mine comes from freelance consulting rather than real estate), and I'm trying to figure out what level of documentation precision I really need to maintain. My income can vary by 40-50% between quarters depending on when big projects wrap up, so I'm wondering if I should be tracking things more granularly than I currently do. Also, for future reference, does anyone know if there are any IRS publications or guidance documents that specifically address best practices for income allocation on Form 2210AI? I'd love to have some official guidance to reference when making these decisions.

0 coins

Savannah Vin

•

Great questions! From what I've seen in audit situations, the IRS typically focuses more on whether your methodology was reasonable and consistently applied rather than scrutinizing every individual transaction. With your 40-50% quarterly variation in consulting income, you'd definitely benefit from more precise allocation than simple averaging. For documentation, I'd recommend keeping project completion dates, invoice dates, and payment received dates. The IRS usually wants to see that you allocated income to the quarter when you actually received payment (assuming you're cash basis), not when you did the work or sent the invoice. As for official guidance, check out IRS Publication 505 "Tax Withholding and Estimated Tax" - it has a section on the annualized income installment method. Also, the instructions for Form 2210 itself provide some guidance on acceptable allocation methods. The key phrase the IRS uses is that allocations should "reasonably reflect" when income was actually received or earned, which gives you some flexibility but requires good faith efforts at accuracy.

0 coins

Payton Black

•

I just want to add my voice to everyone else encouraging you to file! I work as a tax preparer and see situations like yours all the time. The Additional Child Tax Credit (ACTC) is absolutely available to you even with zero income - that's exactly what it's designed for. A few things I always tell clients in your situation: • You can get up to $1,600 refunded for your 16-year-old (his last qualifying year!) • Filing electronically is crucial - paper returns are taking 4-6 months right now • Make sure you have his Social Security Number, not an ITIN, for the full credit • The IRS Form 8812 handles the ACTC calculation, but good software does this automatically Given your health challenges this year, that $1,600 refund could really help. And honestly, even if there was only a small chance of getting money back, it would still be worth filing - but in your case, you're almost certainly eligible for the full refundable amount. The VITA program others mentioned is fantastic for free help, or if you're comfortable with software, most of the major platforms handle this situation smoothly. Don't let this opportunity pass by - you've been through enough this year without missing out on money that's rightfully yours!

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of professional insight I was hoping for! As someone who's never dealt with filing when I had zero income, it's so reassuring to hear from an actual tax preparer that my situation is common and definitely eligible for the ACTC. The tip about making sure my son has an SSN rather than an ITIN is important - thankfully he does have a valid SSN since he was born here. I really appreciate you emphasizing the electronic filing too - 4-6 months for paper returns sounds like a nightmare! The fact that you see cases like mine "all the time" actually makes me feel so much better about this whole process. I was worried I was in some weird edge case, but it sounds like the ACTC is working exactly as intended for families like mine. Thank you for taking the time to break this down so clearly - I'm definitely going to file now! šŸ™

0 coins

Connor Byrne

•

I'm so sorry to hear about your health struggles this year, but I have great news for you! You absolutely should file your tax return even with zero income. The Additional Child Tax Credit (ACTC) is specifically designed for situations like yours - you can get up to $1,600 back as a refundable credit for your 16-year-old son. Since your son is 16, this is actually his LAST year to qualify (they must be under 17 at the end of the tax year), so you definitely don't want to miss this opportunity. The ACTC is the refundable portion of the Child Tax Credit, meaning you get the money even if you don't owe any taxes. Here's what I'd recommend: • File electronically if possible - paper returns are taking months to process right now • Use free tax software like FreeTaxUSA or TaxAct, or check out the VITA program for free in-person help • Make sure you have your son's Social Security Number ready • Set up direct deposit for faster refund processing I was in a similar situation a few years ago due to medical issues and was so grateful I filed - that refund really helped during a tough time. Don't let financial stress add to your health recovery. You've got this! šŸ’™

0 coins

Luca Marino

•

I'm honestly shocked by how many ppl think the IRS has the resources to handle the volume they get. They're processing ~2.5 MILLION returns per week with Reagan-era computers and half the staff they need. The fact that anyone gets their refund within 21 days is a miracle.

0 coins

Nia Davis

•

This. People don't realize how ancient their systems are. They're literally running on COBOL and can't find programmers who know it anymore because it's from the 1960s.

0 coins

I'm in almost the exact same situation - filed 3/15, accepted same day, and still showing "still being processed" (not just "being processed"). Based on what others have said here about the wording difference, sounds like we're both stuck in manual review. The child tax credit you mentioned is probably what triggered it since those are getting extra scrutiny this year. I've been checking my transcript obsessively but no codes like 570 or 971 either. Just the waiting game at this point. At least now I know it could be 30-120 days for manual review instead of the mythical 21 days they advertise. Hang in there!

0 coins

LunarLegend

•

This is why I always fill out a new W4 claiming ZERO exemptions even though I could claim more. I'd rather get a refund than owe money. Last year I got back almost $3k!

0 coins

That's basically giving the government an interest-free loan of your money. You could have had that $3k throughout the year and invested it or used it when you needed it.

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

•

I'm sorry this happened to you! I work in payroll and see this issue more often than you'd think. While it's frustrating, the responsibility for monitoring withholdings does fall on the employee. However, I understand how easy it is to trust that your employer got it right. For future reference, on a $12,700 annual salary, you should expect to see roughly $25-30 per pay period withheld for federal taxes (assuming bi-weekly pay). The fact that you only had $96 total for the year means something was definitely wrong with how your W4 was processed. My advice: Submit a new W4 to HR immediately with clear, legible information. Also ask them to verify what they have on file - sometimes handwriting gets misread or data entry errors happen. Going forward, always check your first 2-3 paystubs after any W4 change to catch issues early. You might also want to make quarterly estimated payments for this year to avoid another surprise tax bill. The IRS has worksheets to help calculate what you should pay.

0 coins

Thank you so much for this helpful breakdown! As someone new to all this tax stuff, it's really reassuring to hear from someone who works in payroll. I had no idea what the normal withholding amounts should look like, so those specific numbers you mentioned ($25-30 per pay period) are super helpful for reference. I'm definitely going to submit a new W4 right away and ask HR to double-check what they have on file. The quarterly estimated payments idea is smart too - I'd rather be safe than sorry after this experience. Do you know if there's a penalty for underpaying if I start making those quarterly payments now for the rest of the year?

0 coins

Prev1...291292293294295...5643Next