


Ask the community...
Don't forget about continuing education! Tax laws change EVERY YEAR so even after you learn the basics, plan to spend 10-20 hours annually just keeping up with changes. The TCJA in 2018 literally made experienced preparers feel like beginners again in some areas.
That's a really good point I hadn't considered. Are there specific resources you'd recommend for staying updated on yearly changes? Is it just a matter of reading IRS publications or are there better ways to keep up?
For staying updated, I highly recommend subscribing to a tax newsletter service like Thomson Reuters Checkpoint or CCH. They break down the changes in plain language with practical examples. The IRS also publishes a "What's New" section each year for major tax forms that highlights changes, but they tend to be very technical. TaxSlayer Pro and other professional software companies also offer decent annual update webinars that summarize the key changes you need to know - sometimes these are free even if you don't use their software.
Your timeline sounds pretty realistic! I've been preparing taxes for about 3 years now, and when I was starting out, I found that the biggest challenge wasn't just learning the software or forms - it was developing the intuition to know when something doesn't look right. One thing that really helped me was keeping a "learning log" where I wrote down every new concept I encountered and why it mattered. For example, when I first learned about the difference between above-the-line and below-the-line deductions, I wrote out scenarios showing how they affected AGI differently. Also, don't underestimate how much client communication skills matter! You'll spend almost as much time explaining things to clients as you do actually preparing returns. Practice explaining tax concepts in simple terms - it'll help solidify your own understanding too. The good news is that once you get comfortable with the fundamentals, each new scenario you encounter builds on what you already know. By your second tax season, you'll be amazed at how much more confident you feel!
Has anyone had this IND-031-04 code problem with tax software other than TurboTax? I'm using H&R Block online and wondering if switching software might help...
I had the same rejection code using FreeTaxUSA, so it's definitely an IRS issue, not a TurboTax problem. Switching software won't help because they all connect to the same IRS e-file system. You need to figure out what AGI the IRS actually has on file for you.
I went through this exact same nightmare last month! After getting rejected 6 times with IND-031-04, I finally discovered the issue was that the IRS had made a small adjustment to my 2023 return that I wasn't aware of. Here's what worked for me: 1. Get your Account Transcript (not Return Transcript) from the IRS website - this shows any changes they made after processing your original return 2. Look for transaction code "290" or "291" which indicates adjustments 3. Calculate your adjusted AGI by adding/subtracting any adjustment amounts from your original AGI In my case, they had corrected a math error that reduced my AGI by $89. Once I used the corrected amount in TurboTax, it went through immediately. The whole process is incredibly frustrating because they don't notify you when they make these adjustments, but you're expected to know about them for e-filing verification. If you can't decipher the transcript codes (they're pretty cryptic), calling the IRS directly to confirm your correct AGI might be worth it, even though their phone system is a nightmare. Good luck!
This is incredibly helpful - thank you for breaking down the specific steps! I'm definitely going to try getting the Account Transcript instead. The fact that they make these adjustments without notifying us but then expect us to know about them for verification is absolutely ridiculous. Did you have any trouble interpreting the transaction codes, or were the 290/291 codes pretty obvious once you knew what to look for? I'm worried I might miss something important in all those numbers and codes.
The 290/291 codes are usually pretty clear once you know what you're looking for, but I'll admit the transcripts can be overwhelming at first glance. Here's a tip that helped me: focus on the "Transaction Date" column first - look for dates after your original filing date in 2023. Any entries with dates later than when you filed are likely adjustments. The 290 codes will show as either positive or negative dollar amounts. If it's negative, subtract that from your original AGI. If positive, add it. There might be multiple adjustment entries, so make sure to account for all of them. One thing that tripped me up initially - ignore the interest and penalty codes (like 160, 161) since those don't affect your AGI calculation. Stick to the 290/291 series for actual tax adjustments. If you're still unsure after getting your Account Transcript, definitely call the IRS to verify - it'll save you from more rejections!
5 I had a similar situation but with a REIT instead of an MLP in my Roth IRA. Can anyone recommend good tax software that handles these special investment situations well? I've been using TurboTax but it seems confused when I try to enter information about retirement account investments.
19 I've had good luck with H&R Block's premium online version for investments. But honestly, for retirement accounts, you generally don't need to report the specific investments at all unless there's UBTI over $1,000 or you're taking distributions. The whole point of retirement accounts is that the investments grow tax-deferred (or tax-free for Roth).
Great question about MLP trading in retirement accounts! As others have mentioned, you're generally in the clear since you were day trading rather than holding for distributions. However, I'd add one important point that hasn't been fully addressed - make sure to keep good records of your trading activity. Even though you likely won't need to report anything for tax purposes, if the IRS ever questions your retirement account activity, having detailed records of your trades (entry/exit dates, amounts, reasoning) can help demonstrate that this was legitimate investment activity rather than prohibited transactions. Also, while UBTI is unlikely to be an issue with your day trading approach, it's worth noting that some MLPs can generate UBTI even without distributions if they have significant business income allocated to unit holders. Since you were only holding positions briefly, this shouldn't affect you, but it's good to be aware of for future reference. The bottom line is that retirement account trading generally shields you from most of these complications, which is exactly why these accounts are so valuable for active investors!
Great question about Schedule E depreciation! I went through this exact same confusion last year. Here's what I learned that might help: The key thing to remember is that residential rental property depreciation is actually pretty standardized - you'll always use the 27.5-year straight-line method under GDS (General Depreciation System). The tricky part is just getting your basis calculation right for the rental portion. One thing that helped me was creating a simple spreadsheet to track everything. I calculated: 1. Total property value (minus land value - super important!) 2. Percentage used for rental (square footage or room count method) 3. Depreciable basis = (Property value - Land value) ร Rental percentage 4. Annual depreciation = Depreciable basis รท 27.5 years For the first year, don't forget to use the mid-month convention if you started renting partway through the year. The IRS has tables in Publication 946 that show exactly how much to depreciate based on which month you placed the property in service. And yes, you'll need Form 4562 for the first year, then the depreciation amount flows to Schedule E line 18 in subsequent years. Once you get the hang of it, it's actually one of the more straightforward parts of rental property taxes!
This is such a helpful breakdown! I'm a first-time rental property owner and the spreadsheet idea is genius. Quick question though - when you mention the mid-month convention, does that apply even if I only started renting out part of my home in December? I'm worried I might be overthinking this, but I want to make sure I don't mess up the first year calculation since it affects all future years.
Yes, the mid-month convention applies regardless of which month you start! If you placed the rental property in service in December, you'd treat it as if it was placed in service in the middle of December for depreciation purposes. This means you'd get 0.5 months (half of December) of depreciation in your first year. Looking at Table A-6 in Publication 946, if you started in December (month 12), you'd use 0.152% of your depreciable basis for the first year. So if your depreciable basis was $100,000, you'd claim $152 in depreciation for that first year. You're definitely not overthinking it - getting the first year right is crucial because it sets up your depreciation schedule for the entire 27.5-year period. The IRS is pretty strict about this, so it's worth taking the time to get it correct from the start!
One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the importance of keeping detailed records for your partial rental depreciation. The IRS can be pretty picky about this, especially if you get audited. I'd recommend documenting: 1. How you calculated the percentage split (square footage measurements, photos showing which areas are rented vs. personal use) 2. Your land vs. building value allocation method and sources 3. The date you first made the space available for rent (not necessarily when you got your first tenant) 4. Any improvements you made specifically for the rental portion Also, be aware that when you eventually sell the property, you'll need to "recapture" the depreciation you've claimed on the rental portion - it gets taxed at up to 25% rather than capital gains rates. This doesn't mean you shouldn't take the depreciation (you should!), but it's good to plan ahead for the tax implications down the road. The depreciation deduction can really add up over the years and significantly reduce your rental income taxes, so it's worth getting this right from the beginning!
Amina Sy
Has anyone considered the actual formation costs? I looked into both: Delaware LLC: $90 filing fee + $50-300 registered agent annually + $300 min annual franchise tax UK LLP: ยฃ10-ยฃ100 filing fee through Companies House + ยฃ13 annual confirmation statement Plus UK doesn't have that weird franchise tax concept! But I guess it all depends on long-term tax consequences rather than just setup costs...
0 coins
Oliver Fischer
โขWhile the formation costs are lower for UK, don't forget that UK LLPs require designated members who have additional responsibilities and potential liabilities. Also, UK LLPs must file annual accounts that are publicly accessible through Companies House - way less privacy than Delaware.
0 coins
Javier Torres
I've been through this exact decision process recently and ended up choosing Delaware LLC after extensive research. Here's what tipped the scales for me: The key factor was future scalability - if you ever plan to raise investment from US venture capital or have US-based partners join later, Delaware is almost universally preferred. Many US investors won't even consider non-US entities. Also, while UK formation costs are lower upfront, the ongoing compliance burden can be heavier. UK LLPs require more detailed annual filings that become public record, whereas Delaware LLCs offer much better privacy protection for members. One thing I learned the hard way: check your state's "doing business" requirements. Even with a Delaware LLC, if you're physically operating from Minnesota, you might need to register as a foreign entity there anyway, which adds costs and complexity. Given that your operations are fully digital and global, I'd lean toward Delaware for the flexibility and investor-friendliness, but definitely run the numbers through one of those tax analysis tools mentioned above to see the actual financial impact for your specific situation.
0 coins
Paolo Marino
โขThis is really helpful perspective on the scalability aspect! I hadn't fully considered how future funding rounds might be affected by the entity choice. Quick question - when you mention Minnesota foreign entity registration, does that apply even if all the actual business operations are digital/remote? I'm based in Minnesota too but was assuming that since we're providing services to international clients online, we might not trigger the "doing business" requirements there. Did you end up having to register in Minnesota as well?
0 coins