


Ask the community...
Ugh, I feel your pain! Just went through this exact same thing last month. Got my adjustment letter and was told 180 days too, but it actually only took about 7 weeks from when I got the letter. The 180 days seems to be their worst-case scenario they give everyone. Have you been able to check your transcripts online? That usually gives you a better idea of what's actually happening with your return. The waiting is definitely the most stressful part though - hang in there! š¤
Thanks @Amina Sy! That's such a relief to hear it only took 7 weeks for you š I haven't checked my transcripts yet but definitely going to do that tonight. Also seeing everyone mention taxr.ai - might give that a shot too since $5 seems worth it for some peace of mind. This whole process is so stressful when you're just trying to figure out what's going on with your own money! š¤
Ugh, I totally get your frustration! I'm dealing with the exact same thing right now - got my adjustment letter about 2 weeks ago and have been spiraling about the 180 day wait time. Reading through all these comments is actually making me feel so much better though! Sounds like most people are getting their refunds way sooner than 6 months. Definitely going to check out taxr.ai tonight after seeing all these success stories - seems like it could save me a lot of stress and sleepless nights wondering what's going on with my return. The IRS really needs to get better at communicating realistic timelines instead of just throwing out the maximum wait time and scaring everyone š
One thing I'm not seeing mentioned here is the risk of continuing as a misclassified worker. My cousin was in this exact situation and didn't address it because she was afraid of losing her job. When she eventually left and filed for unemployment, she was denied because she had no employment history - just 1099 income. Also had zero credit toward Social Security and no worker's comp when she got injured on the job.
This happened to my roommate too. He also discovered that being misclassified meant he couldn't qualify for certain loans because on paper he looked self-employed with "inconsistent income" despite working a regular 40-hour schedule for years. The lender wanted 2 years of self-employment history which he didn't technically have since he was really just a misclassified employee.
This is such an important issue that more people need to understand. I've seen this happen so many times in the beauty industry specifically - salon owners often misclassify assistants and junior stylists to avoid payroll costs, but it really hurts the workers in the long run. Your partner should definitely document everything right now - work schedules, payment records, any written instructions about dress code or procedures, texts about when to come in or take breaks. The more evidence she has showing that her boss controls how, when, and where she works, the stronger her case will be. One thing to consider is that many states have their own independent contractor tests that are even stricter than the federal IRS test. Some states use an "ABC test" where all three criteria must be met for someone to be considered an independent contractor. Given that your partner works set hours following someone else's rules, she'd likely fail most state tests too. The salon owner may genuinely not understand the law, but ignorance isn't a defense. Employee misclassification costs the government billions in lost tax revenue and denies workers basic protections. Your partner deserves to have proper employment status, access to unemployment benefits, and not have to pay double FICA taxes on income that should be treated as wages.
Has anyone checked if this varies by state? I'm in Tennessee and had a similar issue with a furniture purchase that never arrived. In my case, the retailer insisted they couldn't refund the sales tax because they'd already sent it to the state, but when I called the Tennessee Department of Revenue directly, they told me the retailer was responsible for refunding the full amount including tax since the sale wasn't completed.
This is actually a pretty common issue that more people should be aware of. The key principle here is that sales tax is only owed when a taxable transaction is completed. If you never received the merchandise, then legally speaking, no sale occurred. Your retailer is either misinformed or being deliberately misleading when they say they "can't" refund the sales tax. While it's true they may have already remitted it to the state, that doesn't absolve them of their responsibility to make you whole. They need to either refund your sales tax directly or help you process a claim with the state tax authority. I'd recommend taking a multi-pronged approach: 1) Document everything as others have suggested, 2) File a complaint with your state's consumer protection agency, 3) Consider disputing the sales tax portion with your credit card company, and 4) if needed, contact your state tax department directly. Most states have provisions for situations exactly like this. Don't let them brush you off - you have legitimate consumer rights here, and $45 is worth fighting for!
I'm literally looking at the EXACT same screen on the Colorado website right now. Called them this morning (used Claimyr.com to get through) and was told the negative balance is definitely my refund. The lady said they're just backed up processing payments but should go out within 10 business days. The system is super confusing!
I went through this exact same thing with my Colorado state refund last year! That negative balance in parentheses is definitely your refund amount - it's just how their accounting system displays money they owe you. I know it's super counterintuitive because normally we think of negative numbers as owing money, but in government accounting, a negative balance means they have a liability to pay you. The status bouncing between "refund reviewed" and "refund processing" is totally normal too - it just means your return passed their review stage and is now in the payment queue. You should see that money deposited within the next week or two. Colorado's tax portal interface is honestly one of the most confusing ones out there, but once you understand their system it makes sense. Congrats on the refund!
Genevieve Cavalier
Has anyone actually had their Schedule E audited for trying to claim unreimbursed partnership expenses despite the TCJA suspension? I've been claiming my home office on Schedule E anyway because my tax software lets me and I haven't had an issue for 2 years...
0 coins
Ethan Scott
ā¢That's playing with fire! The software lets you input it, but that doesn't mean it's legal. Just because you haven't been audited yet doesn't mean you won't be. The IRS has up to 3 years to audit your return (6 years in some cases).
0 coins
Genevieve Cavalier
ā¢Good point - definitely don't want to risk an audit. I think I'll look into the guaranteed payment approach mentioned above. Seems like a more legitimate way to get the deduction while staying compliant.
0 coins
Dylan Baskin
I went through this exact situation last year and ended up working with a tax professional to sort it out. Here's what I learned: The key issue is that under TCJA, unreimbursed partnership expenses are essentially not deductible on your personal return through 2025. However, there are several legitimate workarounds: 1. **Partnership Reimbursement Plan**: Have your partnership adopt an accountable plan to reimburse you for the home office expenses. The partnership deducts it, and you don't report the reimbursement as income. 2. **Guaranteed Payments**: As mentioned above, the partnership can make guaranteed payments to you for office space usage, which creates self-employment income that you can then deduct against on Schedule C. 3. **Partnership-Level Allocation**: Some partnerships can allocate these expenses at the entity level rather than having partners claim them individually. The guaranteed payment route worked best for me since it was straightforward to document and my partnership was small enough to easily amend our agreement. Yes, you pay SE tax on the guaranteed payments, but the home office deduction (using the simplified method) often more than offsets this. Whatever you do, don't just claim it on Schedule E without proper structure - the IRS computers will eventually catch up with returns claiming suspended deductions. Better to do it right from the start!
0 coins
Katherine Harris
ā¢This is really helpful! I'm new to partnership taxation and had no idea about these workarounds. Quick question - for the guaranteed payment approach, roughly how much SE tax would I be looking at on $1,500 in guaranteed payments? I want to make sure the math works out before I propose this to my partners. Also, did you need to get a lawyer involved to amend your partnership agreement, or were you able to handle that part yourselves? Our partnership is pretty small (just 3 partners) so I'm hoping we can keep it simple.
0 coins