


Ask the community...
Don't forget to also look into how this might affect financial aid! When my kid got a tuition benefit from my university job, it counted as a resource in financial aid calculations and reduced her eligibility for other university scholarships and grants. In our case, the tuition benefit wasn't taxable, but it did mean she couldn't get need-based aid from the university that she might have otherwise qualified for. We ended up slightly better off financially, but not as much as we initially thought. Also, if your daughter is applying early decision, make absolutely sure you understand how the benefit works beforehand. Once you commit through early decision, you're obligated to attend regardless of the financial package.
This is such an important point. At our university, the tuition benefit for employees' children replaces ALL other university scholarships, even merit-based ones. So if your child would have qualified for merit scholarships that might have covered 50% of tuition anyway, you're only really benefiting from the other 50% the employee benefit covers.
As someone who went through this exact situation three years ago, I can confirm that the Section 117(d) qualified tuition reduction for undergraduate education is indeed tax-free with no dollar limit. My daughter's tuition was around $75K and we didn't pay a penny in taxes on that benefit. The key thing that helped me was getting everything in writing from HR before my daughter committed. I asked specifically for documentation that confirmed our benefit was structured as a "qualified tuition reduction under IRC Section 117(d)" rather than taxable compensation. This documentation was crucial when I filed our taxes - my tax preparer needed it to properly exclude the benefit from our income. One tip: ask your HR department for the specific tax code they use when reporting (or not reporting) this benefit. If they're treating it correctly as a Section 117(d) benefit, they shouldn't be issuing you any tax forms for it at all. If they mention Forms 1098-T or W-2 reporting, that might indicate they're treating it as taxable income, which would be wrong for undergraduate tuition benefits for employees' dependents. The early decision timeline does add pressure, but getting this clarity upfront will give you peace of mind. In my experience, most university HR departments understand these rules well once you use the specific tax code language - it's just that they're cautious about giving tax advice.
after 5 months of my transcript being blank and the as of date changing multiple times, i finally broke down and spent money on claimyr.com to actually talk to a human at the IRS. turns out they flagged my return because my 2022 return hadn't fully processed yet due to a clerical error on their end. the agent fixed it right away and I got both refunds within 2 weeks. sometimes you just need to talk to a real person to fix these issues.
I'm going through almost the exact same thing! Filed in March 2023 and my transcript has been blank forever. Just like you, I've had to verify my identity multiple times (twice online and once by phone). My "as of" date also recently changed to a future date in 2025. It's so frustrating because you feel completely in the dark about what's happening. I've been checking my transcript obsessively too, hoping to see some kind of update or code that would give me a clue about the status. From what I'm reading in the other comments, it sounds like the date change might actually be a positive sign that things are moving forward. I really hope that's the case for both of us! Let me know if you see any other updates on your transcript.
Oh wow, it's such a relief to hear from someone in the exact same situation! I was starting to think I was the only one dealing with this nightmare. The obsessive transcript checking is driving me crazy too - I probably check it 3-4 times a day hoping something will finally appear. It's encouraging that you also had the date change recently. Maybe we're both finally getting close to some resolution! I'm trying to stay optimistic after reading some of the other comments about this being a good sign. I'll definitely keep you posted if I see any updates. Please do the same! It helps knowing I'm not alone in this mess. Fingers crossed we both get some good news soon π€
Speaking from experience (3 years running a US-based online marketing business while traveling), the technical/practical aspects were actually harder than the legal/tax aspects. Time zone challenges when clients expect meetings during US business hours but you're in Asia was brutal. Internet reliability is another huge factor - I learned to always have backup internet options (local SIM with hotspot capability + regular wifi). Also recommend setting up a good VoIP phone service that lets you maintain a US number. I use Google Voice which lets me make/receive US calls from anywhere. Clients never knew I was responding from a beach in Bali at 11pm my time.
One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is visa requirements and how they might affect your tax situation. While you can absolutely run your US business from abroad, some countries have strict rules about working on tourist visas, even if it's remote work for a US company. Countries like Thailand, Vietnam, and several European nations are cracking down on "digital nomads" working on tourist visas. Getting caught could result in deportation and future visa denials. Consider looking into digital nomad visas that several countries now offer - Portugal, Estonia, and Barbados have legitimate remote work visas. Also, be aware that spending too much time in certain countries (usually 183+ days) can trigger tax residency there, which could complicate your US tax situation even with the FEIE. Each country has different thresholds and rules. I'd strongly recommend consulting with both a US international tax attorney AND researching the work visa requirements for each country you plan to visit. The $500-1000 you spend on proper legal advice upfront could save you from major legal and tax headaches down the road.
This is such an important point that people often overlook! I'm actually planning something similar and had no idea about the 183-day tax residency rules. Do you know if there's a good resource to check these thresholds for different countries? I was planning to spend about 4 months in Portugal and 3 months in Thailand, so I want to make sure I don't accidentally trigger tax residency anywhere. Also curious about the digital nomad visas - do those change your tax situation at all compared to being on a tourist visa? I assume having official permission to work remotely is better than the gray area of tourist visas, but wasn't sure if it creates any additional tax obligations.
If you're experiencing the SBTPG lag issue, there's an alternative verification method worth trying. Log into your IRS transcript and look for Code 846 with the current cycle date. This Transaction Code indicates the IRS has released your refund to the designated recipient (SBTPG in this case). The date associated with this code typically precedes your actual bank deposit by 1-5 business days. This verification method bypasses SBTPG's system entirely and gives you confirmation directly from the source.
This timing discrepancy has been driving me crazy! I filed three weeks ago and have been refreshing the SBTPG portal obsessively. Based on what everyone's sharing here, it sounds like I should actually be checking my bank account more frequently than the SBTPG site. Has anyone found a reliable pattern for when deposits typically hit accounts versus when SBTPG updates? Like, is it usually overnight deposits that create the biggest lag, or does it happen at all times of day? I'm trying to figure out if there's an optimal time to check my bank account instead of wearing out the SBTPG portal refresh button!
Emma Davis
Has anyone had experience with how state taxes work with dual-status federal returns? I'm in a similar situation but also worried about state filing requirements. California seems particularly aggressive about taxing people with any connection to the state.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
β’California is indeed very aggressive! I moved out mid-year and they required me to file a part-year resident return. The tricky part was that they considered certain income items taxable even after I physically left the state if they originated from California sources. Definitely check your specific state's rules - they don't necessarily align with federal residency definitions.
0 coins
GalacticGuardian
I went through a very similar situation last year and can confirm you'll need to file as dual-status. The IRS is pretty strict about this - if you change residency status during the tax year, dual-status filing is mandatory regardless of how simple your income situation might seem. For your capital gains, since you sold the stocks while physically present in the US (before May 2025), they'll be reported on the Form 1040 portion of your return, not the 1040NR. This is because the US has taxing rights on capital gains realized while you were a US resident for tax purposes. One thing to watch out for - make sure you're calculating your exact residency termination date correctly using the substantial presence test. It might not be exactly when you physically left in May, depending on your presence history in prior years. The IRS has specific rules about this that can affect which form certain income items go on. I ended up hiring a CPA who specializes in international tax because the dual-status rules are genuinely complex, but I know that's not always budget-friendly. If you do go the DIY route, make sure to attach a statement to your return explaining the dual-status filing and clearly marking which periods each form covers.
0 coins