IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls โ€“ which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

QuantumQuasar

โ€ข

Has anyone used the "last-month rule" instead of prorating in situations like this? From what I understand, if you're eligible on December 1st, you can contribute the full annual amount (individual or family based on December status) as long as you remain eligible through the end of the following year. Would that work in the original poster's situation?

0 coins

Yes, the last-month rule could potentially apply here, but with an important caveat. Since only the husband was HSA-eligible on December 1st (with individual HDHP coverage), he could use the last-month rule to contribute the full individual maximum ($3,850) for 2023 - not the family maximum. He would need to remain HSA-eligible through December 31, 2024, to avoid penalties and taxes on the "accelerated" portion of that contribution. If he fails the testing period, he'd owe taxes plus a 10% penalty on the portion he wouldn't normally be eligible for. In this case, the prorated calculation allowing $6,450 actually permits a larger contribution than the last-month rule would ($3,850), so prorating is more advantageous here.

0 coins

Layla Mendes

โ€ข

This is a great breakdown of how to handle HSA contributions with mid-year coverage changes! I wanted to add one important point about timing that might help others in similar situations. When making these prorated contributions, you have until the tax filing deadline (typically April 15th of the following year) to make HSA contributions for the previous tax year. So even though you're figuring this out now, you still have time to make the calculated $6,450 contribution for 2023 if you haven't already maxed it out. Also, make sure to keep detailed records of the coverage change dates and your calculations. The IRS may want documentation if they ever question your contribution amounts, especially with the complexity of mid-year switches between family and individual coverage. Your insurance company should be able to provide letters or statements showing exactly when coverage types changed. Congratulations on the pregnancy, by the way! Once your little one arrives, you'll likely be able to switch back to family HDHP coverage and family contribution limits if that makes sense for your situation.

0 coins

Omar Hassan

โ€ข

Has anyone tried using one of those Certified Acceptance Agents instead of going directly through the IRS? The thought of sending my wife's original passport in the mail is making me really nervous...

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

โ€ข

I used a CAA for my husband's ITIN last year and it was SO much better than dealing with the IRS directly. They verified his original documents in person and then just submitted copies to the IRS with the application. Took about 8 weeks to get the ITIN back. Definitely worth the fee for peace of mind not sending original documents through mail.

0 coins

Jade O'Malley

โ€ข

Just to add some clarity for anyone else in this situation - you absolutely can apply for an ITIN after filing your return! I went through this exact process with my partner last year. The key things to remember: 1. Use Form W-7 and include a complete copy of your already-filed tax return as supporting documentation 2. If you're nervous about mailing original documents (totally understandable!), definitely look into using a Certified Acceptance Agent - they can verify originals in person and submit copies 3. The ITIN application won't affect your already-filed return for this year, but it will give you more filing options next year The whole process took about 10 weeks for us when we went through a CAA. Yes, there's a small fee, but the peace of mind was worth it. Don't stress too much - this is a pretty common situation and the IRS handles it regularly!

0 coins

Darcy Moore

โ€ข

This is really helpful, thank you! I'm actually in a similar boat - filed separately and now realizing I should get an ITIN for my spouse. Quick question about the CAA route: how do you find a legitimate Certified Acceptance Agent? Is there a directory on the IRS website or something? I want to make sure I'm not getting scammed by someone claiming to be certified when they're not.

0 coins

Yes, there's an official IRS directory! You can find authorized Certified Acceptance Agents on the IRS website - just search for "CAA directory" or "Certified Acceptance Agent locator." The IRS maintains a searchable database where you can filter by location and services offered. Make sure whoever you choose is actually listed in the official directory - there are unfortunately some sketchy services out there that claim to be CAAs when they're not. The legitimate ones will have their authorization displayed and you can verify their status directly with the IRS if you have any doubts. Most tax preparation offices like H&R Block or local CPAs can also be CAAs, so that might be another route to explore in your area.

0 coins

Mason Lopez

โ€ข

This is such a helpful discussion! As someone who's been wrestling with this exact decision for months, I really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences. One thing I want to add that might help others - make sure you understand the housing allowance implications too. When I was researching Form 4361, I discovered that ministers can designate part of their salary as housing allowance, which is exempt from income tax (though still subject to SE tax if you haven't filed the exemption). This can be a significant tax benefit that partially offsets the decision either way. Also, for anyone still within their filing window, I'd strongly recommend calculating the actual dollar impact over your entire career, not just the immediate savings. The SE tax is 15.3%, but you need to factor in what you'd lose in Social Security benefits at retirement. For some ministers, especially those with lower lifetime earnings, the Social Security benefits might actually be worth more than the taxes saved. The disability insurance point that Kai brought up is crucial too - that's honestly something I hadn't fully considered until reading this thread.

0 coins

Dylan Wright

โ€ข

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive analysis I needed to see! The housing allowance point is particularly interesting - I hadn't realized how that might factor into the overall tax picture. You're absolutely right about doing the long-term math rather than just looking at immediate savings. I've been so focused on the 15.3% SE tax rate that I haven't properly calculated what those Social Security benefits would actually be worth in today's dollars when I retire in 30+ years. The disability insurance discussion has definitely been a wake-up call too. It's one of those risks you don't think about until it's too late. Thanks for adding that perspective about the housing allowance - that's definitely something I need to research more as I'm making this decision.

0 coins

Cole Roush

โ€ข

As a newcomer to this discussion, I'm really grateful for all the detailed insights everyone has shared. I'm currently in my first year as a youth pastor and just learned about Form 4361, so this conversation is incredibly timely for me. One question I haven't seen addressed yet - does anyone know how this exemption affects ministers who might transition between different types of ministry roles? For example, if I move from being a youth pastor to a senior pastor role, or if I eventually work for a denominational headquarters rather than a local church, does that impact the exemption status? Also, I'm curious about the interaction with state taxes. I know we're focusing on federal SE tax here, but do any states have similar exemptions or complications that ministers should be aware of when making this decision? The points about disability insurance and long-term financial planning have really opened my eyes. It sounds like this decision requires much more comprehensive financial planning than I initially realized. Thank you all for sharing your real-world experiences - it's helping me think through this decision much more thoroughly than I would have on my own.

0 coins

Mei Wong

โ€ข

Keep in mind that the "best" incorporation state isn't just about taxes. I incorporated in Delaware, and while I do pay the annual franchise tax, the legal protection has been invaluable. Had a major contract dispute with a client, and Delaware's Court of Chancery handled it efficiently. Also, if you ever plan to seek venture capital, many investors prefer Delaware C-Corps because of the predictable legal framework. Even if you save a little on taxes elsewhere, you might face higher costs if you incorporate elsewhere then need to convert to a Delaware entity later.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

โ€ข

100% agree on the Delaware point for fundraising. We incorporated in Wyoming initially to save on taxes, but when we went for our Series A, our investors basically required us to convert to a Delaware C-Corp. Cost us way more in legal fees for the conversion than we ever saved on taxes.

0 coins

CosmicCaptain

โ€ข

Great discussion here! As someone who went through this exact decision last year, I'd add that you should also consider the ongoing administrative burden of your choice. While Wyoming and Nevada are tax-friendly, Delaware has the most streamlined annual reporting process I've encountered. Their Division of Corporations website is actually user-friendly (shocking for a government site), and you can handle most filings online without needing to mail paperwork or deal with antiquated systems. Also, since you mentioned retaining earnings in the corporate structure - make sure to factor in potential accumulated earnings tax implications at the federal level if you're planning to hold onto significant cash without distributing it. This is a federal issue regardless of state, but some states have additional rules around unreasonable accumulation that could affect your strategy. Given your SaaS model and remote workforce, I'd seriously consider running the numbers on a Delaware C-Corp vs. the traditional tax haven states. The legal predictability and ease of administration might be worth the modest tax difference, especially as you scale.

0 coins

Adrian Hughes

โ€ข

This is really helpful perspective on the administrative side! I hadn't thought much about the ongoing paperwork burden, but you're right that it could add up over time. Quick question - when you mention accumulated earnings tax, what's the threshold where that becomes a concern? Is it based on a dollar amount or percentage of revenue? Also, for someone just starting to think about this stuff, is there a good resource to understand the conversion process if I pick one state now but need to switch later? Sounds like it can get expensive based on what @QuantumQuasar mentioned about their Series A experience.

0 coins

Aaliyah Jackson

โ€ข

Has anyone used QuickBooks Self-Employed for tracking both methods simultaneously? I heard there's a way to set it up to compare them at tax time.

0 coins

KylieRose

โ€ข

Yes! Go to the Mileage section and turn on "Track actual car expenses" in the settings. It will track both and show you a comparison. The catch is that it doesn't fully account for the "locked in" rule we're discussing here - it just shows you what would be better this year.

0 coins

Liam O'Connor

โ€ข

As someone who's been through this exact scenario with my photography business, I completely understand your frustration! The "locked in" rule for actual expenses is one of those tax traps that catches a lot of small business owners off guard. Given your high mileage (15,782 business miles), the standard mileage deduction would give you about $10,337 this year alone (at 65.5 cents per mile). With actual expenses, you're probably looking at significantly less unless you have unusually high vehicle costs. Here's my take: if you're planning to keep this car for several more years and maintain similar mileage patterns, paying the $2,750 now is likely worth it. You'll probably recoup that cost within the first year of using standard mileage, and then continue saving thousands annually. Before making the final decision, I'd recommend calculating your total actual expenses for this year (including depreciation, gas, insurance, repairs, registration, etc.) and comparing that to what standard mileage would give you. If the gap is as wide as I suspect, the math strongly favors taking the hit now. Also consider consulting with a tax professional who specializes in small business returns - they can run the numbers for your specific situation and help you avoid any pitfalls with the amendment process.

0 coins

Prev1...26582659266026612662...5643Next