I started a similar channel last year and my accountant told me that since I'm making money from the videos, my materials are "cost of goods sold" basically. But she also said I should keep a log showing how each project was used in videos with links to the actual content. Makes audit protection stronger.

Great discussion everyone! As someone who's been doing content creation for a few years, I want to add that depreciation is another important consideration that hasn't been mentioned yet. For expensive equipment like cameras, editing computers, or major tools, you might need to depreciate them over several years rather than deduct the full cost upfront. Also, don't forget about the home office deduction if you have a dedicated space for editing or storing equipment. Even if it's just a corner of a room used exclusively for your content work, you can deduct a portion of your rent/mortgage and utilities. One more tip - if you're driving to filming locations or picking up materials, track those miles! Business mileage is deductible and it adds up faster than you'd think. I use a simple app to log every trip and it's saved me hundreds on my taxes.

Has anyone considered the legal aspects of this beyond just taxes? If your name is on the deed but your dad paid everything, what happens if you have creditor issues? Or what if you get divorced? Your dad's house could be considered your asset in those situations too.

This is such a complex situation that really highlights how family property arrangements can create unexpected tax consequences. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the potential for a "constructive trust" argument. Since your father paid for everything and you've never treated this as rental income, you might be able to argue that you hold legal title but your father has the beneficial ownership. The key is going to be documentation - bank records showing his payments, any informal agreements you might have had, and evidence that you never treated this as an investment property. I'd strongly recommend getting a consultation with both a tax attorney and an estate planning attorney before your father passes away. They might be able to help you restructure this arrangement in a way that minimizes future tax complications. Also consider whether there might be any benefit to filing amended returns for recent years to properly report this arrangement, though that's definitely something to discuss with a professional first.

The community wisdom here is solid - there's a very predictable pattern with PATH Act refunds that seems to hold year after year. Compared to regular non-PATH returns which can process in as little as 7-10 days, PATH returns follow this mid-to-late February pattern consistently. I'm concerned about those depending on these funds for medical expenses though - have you considered reaching out to your medical provider about payment plans that could start after your anticipated refund date? Many providers will work with patients when they know funds are coming, especially for necessary procedures. It might give you more scheduling flexibility while still respecting the reality of when these refunds actually arrive.

This is incredibly valuable data - thank you for tracking this so meticulously! As someone who also depends on tax refunds for medical expenses, I really appreciate seeing actual numbers instead of just the vague IRS guidance. Your 7-year pattern clearly shows that despite what the website says about February 15th, the reality is consistently late February. I'm in a similar boat this year - filed early January and waiting on my PATH refund to cover some dental work that can't wait much longer. Based on your data and what others have shared here, I'm going to stop checking WMR obsessively and just plan for the last week of February. It's frustrating that the IRS communications are so misleading about the actual timeline, but at least we have real community data to rely on. Have you found any correlation between your e-filing date and where you fall in that February 22-25 window? I'm curious if filing on January 26th vs earlier in January affects which batch you end up in.

A key difference not mentioned yet: tax attorneys can represent you in Tax Court, CPAs cannot. I found this out the hard way when my tax situation escalated and my CPA had to step aside. If your issue is primarily about getting accurate tax returns filed (including correcting past returns), go with a CPA. If your issue involves potential legal disputes with the IRS, especially if significant penalties or criminal charges might be involved, you need a tax attorney. Some situations where a tax attorney is essential: - Criminal tax fraud investigations - Significant tax penalties you want to dispute - Tax Court representation - Complex international tax issues with legal implications

Another thing to consider is that some professionals are both CPAs AND tax attorneys! If your situation is complex like the original poster's, finding a dual-credentialed professional might be worth it. They tend to be more expensive but can be a one-stop solution.

Check your mail like a hawk. I had this last year and missed their letter asking for ID verification. Delayed everything by 2 months smh

Code 810 with early filing is pretty normal - they're probably just doing their usual verification checks since you filed so early in the season. I wouldn't stress too much unless you get a letter asking for docs. Most of these clear up automatically within 2-3 weeks once they finish processing the backlog from holiday season.