IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

CyberSamurai

•

I've been through the TAS process twice for different tax issues, and timing really does matter with amendments. From my experience, you absolutely can request TAS assistance immediately if you have legitimate hardship - the "waiting period" some people mention isn't actually a hard rule when you're facing eviction. Here's what worked for me: I called TAS directly at 877-777-4778 and had my eviction notice, past-due utility bills, and bank statements ready when I called. The key is being very specific about your timeline - tell them exactly when you're facing eviction and that you need the refund to prevent it. One thing that surprised me was that TAS can actually place a priority flag on your amendment even before it shows up in the normal tracking system. My advocate told me this bypasses some of the regular processing queues. That said, I agree with others here that you should pursue multiple options simultaneously. Contact local rental assistance programs, see if your utility companies have hardship programs, and maybe even reach out to your landlord about a payment plan. TAS helped me, but it still took 6 weeks total, and you might need bridge solutions while waiting. Good luck - the stress of waiting for tax money when you're facing eviction is awful, but don't give up on getting help.

0 coins

Zara Khan

•

Thank you for sharing your experience - this is really helpful! I'm curious about the priority flag you mentioned. Did your advocate explain how that works exactly? I'm wondering if there are specific codes or processes they use to bypass the normal queues, or if it's more informal. Also, when you say it still took 6 weeks total, was that from when you first called TAS or from when your advocate was assigned? I'm trying to set realistic expectations for my own timeline.

0 coins

I just went through this exact situation two months ago and wanted to share what actually happened versus what I expected. Filed my amendment on January 15th, facing foreclosure with a March 1st deadline. Called TAS on January 18th (yes, just 3 days after filing) with my foreclosure notice and financial documentation. Here's the reality check: they assigned me an advocate on January 25th, but the advocate couldn't actually DO anything until my amendment showed up in their system, which took until February 8th. So while you can get assigned quickly with proper hardship documentation, there's still a technical waiting period for the amendment to enter their processing system. My advocate was honest about this limitation upfront, which I appreciated. The good news? Once my amendment was in the system, my advocate was able to expedite it and I had my refund by February 28th - literally 2 days before my foreclosure deadline. Without TAS, I was looking at a 16-20 week wait that would have cost me my house. My advice: call TAS immediately with your eviction documentation, but also start looking into emergency rental assistance programs in your area as a backup plan. The combination saved me from losing everything.

0 coins

How to properly claim margin loan interest deduction on taxes - carryover questions

I'm trying to file my taxes with TurboTax and hitting a wall with margin loan interest deductions. From what I understand, you can deduct margin interest if: a) you're itemizing deductions and b) your investment income/capital gains for the year equal or exceed your margin interest amount. I also believe that if you can't claim margin interest in a year because you don't meet conditions a) or b), it should carry over to future years indefinitely. Please correct me if I've got this wrong. This year, I can finally take the deduction since I'm meeting both conditions a) and b). However, between 2020 and 2024, I've accumulated around $17,500 in margin interest that I never deducted. Here's where I'm stuck: TurboTax lets me input my 2025 margin interest fine, but when I try to enter the carried-over interest from 2024, it asks for information from Form 4952 - which I've never completed before. Looking into it further, it seems Form 4952 is where you calculate disallowed interest when you don't meet condition b) above. I never filled out this form in previous years because either I didn't itemize, or I had net investment losses exceeding my margin interest, or both. I realize I could go back and amend returns to complete the form, but amendments are only allowed for three years, so I'd lose anything beyond that. Plus, why would you complete Form 4952 in years you didn't itemize anyway? Is there something I'm misunderstanding? If I never formally claimed and had the margin interest deduction "properly disallowed" in prior years, can I still carry it over? Or am I really forced to amend prior returns to capture this deduction?

NebulaNova

•

FYI - the rules for investment interest expense are in Publication 550. Specifically, on page 33 it says: "If you paid interest on a margin account to buy taxable securities, the interest paid (subject to investment income limits) is deductible as an itemized deduction." The IRS does allow indefinite carryforward of disallowed investment interest, but as others have mentioned, you need to establish this each year on Form 4952, even in years you don't itemize. One point no one mentioned: To increase your investment income limit, you can elect to treat qualified dividends and long-term capital gains as ordinary income (taxed at higher rates) to expand the amount of investment interest you can deduct in a given year. This election might make sense if your disallowed interest is substantial.

0 coins

wait what...you can choose to have some of your long term capital gains treated as ordinary income just to deduct more margin interest? would that ever actually save you money overall? seems like youd lose the lower capital gains rate...

0 coins

QuantumLeap

•

@fd111dffc265 It can actually save money in certain situations! The election makes sense when your marginal tax rate is relatively close to the capital gains rate, or when you have substantial carryover interest. For example, if you're in the 22% bracket and have long-term gains that would be taxed at 15%, you're only giving up 7% in tax efficiency. But if you have thousands in margin interest carryovers that would otherwise be wasted, the deduction at your marginal rate (22%) could easily outweigh that 7% difference. The key is doing the math for your specific situation. TurboTax and other software can help calculate whether the election makes sense, but it's definitely worth considering if you have large investment interest carryovers.

0 coins

Serene Snow

•

This is a really comprehensive discussion! I just wanted to add one more perspective as someone who went through a similar situation a few years ago. The harsh reality is that if you never filed Form 4952 in prior years, you're in a gray area. While the law allows indefinite carryforward of investment interest, the IRS expects you to have established those carryovers properly each year. Here's what I did in my situation: I amended the returns I could (last 3 years) and for the older years, I prepared "shadow" Form 4952s - essentially filling out what I would have filed if I had done it correctly back then. I kept these with detailed brokerage statements as supporting documentation. When I claimed the older carryovers on my current return, I included a statement explaining the situation and referencing my supporting documentation. My return was processed without issue, though I realize that doesn't guarantee audit protection. One thing to consider: if your margin interest from the amendable years (2022-2024) is substantial enough to provide meaningful tax savings, it might be worth focusing just on those rather than risking questions about the older amounts. Sometimes the bird in the hand approach is better than trying to capture everything and potentially triggering scrutiny of your entire investment interest situation.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice, especially the "shadow" Form 4952 approach. I'm wondering - when you included the statement explaining your situation with the older carryovers, did you attach it as a separate document or just include it in the "other information" section of your tax software? Also, how detailed did you get in explaining the situation? I'm worried about drawing too much attention to it, but I also want to be transparent about why I'm claiming carryovers without having filed the proper forms in prior years. The point about focusing on just the amendable years makes a lot of sense too. Better to secure what I can definitively document than risk the whole thing.

0 coins

Aiden Chen

•

Something everyone's missing - check if you even needed to file! If your income is only 4100 Swiss francs annually (roughly $4500 USD), that's below the filing threshold for most years. For 2022, the standard deduction was $12,950 for single filers, so if you earned less than that, you weren't even required to file a US return. For your retired mom, it depends on her income sources and amounts, but the thresholds are different for seniors. Don't waste money on expensive tax specialists until you determine if you even had a filing requirement based on your income level!

0 coins

Madison King

•

That's a good point! To clarify, the 4100 Swiss francs is my monthly income, not annual. So annually I make about 49,200 francs (roughly $54,000 USD). I guess that means I do need to file? My dad lives mostly on his Swiss pension and some small investment income. Would that change things for him?

0 coins

Aiden Chen

•

Ah, at 49,200 francs annually (about $54k USD), you definitely do have a filing requirement. However, with the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion, you'll likely owe no US tax if you're paying Swiss taxes already. For your dad, pension income is generally taxable, but the US-Switzerland tax treaty may provide special treatment. Investment income is typically always reportable. So yes, he would likely need to file too. However, at his age (over 65), there could be higher standard deductions that would reduce or eliminate any US tax burden. Again though, neither of you need to worry about travel issues. Just start the compliance process when you can. The Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures others mentioned is designed exactly for situations like yours.

0 coins

Just wanted to add some reassurance from someone who went through this exact situation! I'm a dual citizen (US/German) who hadn't filed US taxes in 8 years while living in Berlin. I was absolutely terrified about traveling to the US for my sister's wedding. Like everyone else has said, there's zero connection between IRS tax compliance and border control. I've traveled to the US multiple times while getting my tax situation sorted out, and it was never an issue. The border agents only care about your passport validity and standard security screening. I used the Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures to catch up on my filings. With your income level and the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion, you'll likely owe nothing. The process took about 6 weeks total, but I didn't wait to travel - I started the process after my trip. Your dad should be fine too. Retired expats are actually in a better position since pension income often has favorable tax treaty treatment. Just enjoy your Boston trip and deal with the tax compliance when you return. The anxiety is so much worse than the actual reality!

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

This is exactly what I needed to hear! Thank you so much for sharing your experience. It's such a relief to know that someone in almost the same situation traveled without issues. I've been spiraling with anxiety about this for weeks. Did you end up owing anything when you filed through the Streamlined procedures? And how did you handle the FBAR filings for all those years? I'm worried I might not have perfect records of all my account balances from previous years. Also, you mentioned your dad might have favorable tax treaty treatment - do you know if the US-Canada tax treaty has similar benefits for pension income? He's been really stressed about this too.

0 coins

Sophia Long

•

I added my father as a dependent on February 3rd, 2024, and received my refund on March 1st, 2024. That's 27 days total, which is about 10 days longer than my refund took last year without the new dependent. The IRS did send me a letter dated February 18th requesting verification, which I promptly provided on February 20th. Based on my experience and what I've seen with friends in similar situations, I'd say expect an additional 1-3 weeks beyond normal processing time, but it's not the months-long delay some people fear.

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

I completely understand your anxiety about adding a new dependent - I went through the same stress last year! The good news is that while new dependents do typically add some processing time, it's usually not the horror story delays you've been reading about. From what I've seen in this community and my own experience, you're looking at an additional 1-3 weeks beyond normal processing time, not months. The IRS has automated verification systems that cross-check your dependent's information, and if everything matches up properly (correct SSN, no conflicts with other returns, etc.), it should move through smoothly. Since you filed on 2/12 and got accepted on 2/13, you're still well within the normal timeframe even with the additional verification. Try to stay positive - most people with legitimate new dependents get their refunds without major issues, just with a bit of extra patience required! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

I went through this exact scenario two years ago - CP05 notice followed by filing an amended return about a week later when I realized I'd missed a 1099-INT. I was terrified I'd made things worse, but it actually worked out perfectly fine. What happened in my case was that the IRS completed their original review first (took about 6 weeks from the CP05 date), and then a few weeks later they processed my amended return. The agent I eventually spoke to said having the amended return already in the system actually helped because it showed I was being proactive about correcting the error rather than trying to hide anything. My advice: Don't second-guess yourself. You did exactly what you should have done when you discovered the missing 1099-B. The worst thing would have been to know about the error and do nothing. Processing might take a bit longer, but you're on the right track.

0 coins

This is so helpful to hear from someone who went through the exact same thing! It's reassuring that the IRS agent actually viewed your amended return as being proactive rather than suspicious. I keep wondering if I should have waited for the CP05 review to finish first, but you're absolutely right - knowing about the missing 1099-B and not correcting it would have been way worse. Thanks for sharing your experience - it really helps to know that others have navigated this successfully!

0 coins

You definitely made the right call filing that amended return! I know it feels scary having both processes running at once, but you're being responsible by correcting the error as soon as you caught it. I actually work in tax preparation and see this situation fairly often - missing 1099-B forms are one of the most common triggers for CP05 notices because the IRS computer systems automatically flag when reported income from brokerages doesn't match what's on your return. By filing the 1040-X proactively, you've likely addressed the exact issue that caused the review in the first place. The IRS systems are designed to handle overlapping processes like this. What typically happens is they'll either complete the original review first and then process your amendment, or they'll notice the amendment during the review and coordinate both. The main downside is just longer processing times - probably looking at 4-6 months total instead of the usual timeframes. But that's much better than facing accuracy penalties or having to deal with a more formal examination later. Keep checking both tracking tools online and stay organized with your paperwork, but try not to stress about the timing. You handled this exactly how you should have!

0 coins

Prev1...21872188218921902191...5643Next