


Ask the community...
Has anyone else noticed that withholding seems super messed up lately? I claimed 0 dependents like OP but I'm still getting way less taken out than last year. I'm worried I'll owe a ton when I file.
Connor, you're definitely not overthinking this! Your approach is actually really smart - claiming 0 dependents on your W-4 will indeed maximize your withholding throughout the year, which often leads to a larger refund when you file. The key thing to remember is that your W-4 withholding and your actual tax return are two completely separate processes. Your W-4 is just telling your employer how much to withhold from each paycheck as an estimate, while your tax return reflects your actual tax situation for the year. Since you have the legal right to claim your son as a dependent for the 2025 tax year (based on your custody agreement), you can absolutely claim him when you file your return, regardless of what you put on your W-4. This might actually work out perfectly for you - you'll have extra tax withheld all year, then get credit for your dependent when you file, potentially resulting in a nice refund. Just make sure you keep good records of your custody arrangement and that you and your ex are crystal clear about who claims your son each year. Having it documented in your divorce decree is ideal. Good luck with the new job!
This is such helpful advice! I'm in a similar post-divorce situation and was confused about this exact thing. One quick question though - when you say "keep good records of your custody arrangement," what specific documents should I be keeping? Is the divorce decree enough, or do I need to track something else like actual nights my daughter stays with me?
Just wanted to add some perspective as someone who's been through an IRS audit related to charitable deductions. The auditor wasn't trying to catch me in some elaborate scheme - they just wanted to see that I had reasonable documentation for my claimed values. What saved me was having photos of the items I donated along with a simple spreadsheet listing each item, its condition, and the value I assigned based on the Salvation Army guide. The auditor spent maybe 10 minutes reviewing it and moved on. The key thing I learned is that the IRS isn't looking for perfection in your valuations - they're looking for evidence that you made a good faith effort to be reasonable. A $20 shirt valued at $25 isn't going to raise eyebrows, but a $20 shirt valued at $200 definitely will. For your dresser specifically, I'd suggest looking up similar pieces on Facebook Marketplace or Craigslist to get a sense of what used furniture in similar condition is actually selling for. That gives you a solid basis for your valuation if anyone ever asks.
This is really reassuring to hear from someone who's actually been through the process! I think a lot of people (myself included) get paranoid about audits when really the IRS just wants to see you made a reasonable effort. Your point about using Facebook Marketplace or Craigslist for furniture valuations is smart - that's probably the most realistic way to figure out what used furniture is actually worth. Way better than just guessing or using some random online calculator. Did the auditor give you any other tips about documentation during your experience? I'm planning some big donations this year and want to make sure I'm doing everything right from the start.
As a tax professional, I want to emphasize that the system actually works pretty well despite seeming vulnerable to abuse. The IRS uses data analytics to flag returns with unusually high charitable deductions relative to income, and they have access to aggregate donation data from major organizations. What most people don't realize is that inflating donation values is considered tax fraud, which can result in penalties of 20-75% of the underpaid tax, plus interest and potential criminal charges. The risk-reward ratio just doesn't make sense for most people. For your situation, I'd recommend documenting everything now even though you already donated. Write down what you remember donating, research fair market values using the Salvation Army guide or similar resources, and keep that documentation with your tax records. For the dresser, check sold listings on eBay or Facebook Marketplace for similar items to establish a reasonable value. The key is being able to show you made a good faith effort to determine fair market value. Perfect accuracy isn't expected, but gross overvaluation will definitely get you in trouble if caught.
This is really helpful insight from a professional perspective! I had no idea the IRS uses data analytics to flag unusually high charitable deductions - that makes a lot of sense as a safeguard against abuse. Your point about the penalties being so severe (20-75% plus interest!) really drives home why honesty is the best policy here. I was mainly curious about how the system works, but now I see there are actually pretty strong deterrents in place. Quick question - when you mention checking "sold listings" on eBay vs just current listings, is there a big difference? I assume sold listings give you a more accurate picture of what people actually paid rather than what sellers are hoping to get?
I've used H&R Block for the past three tax seasons and can confirm they use Axos Bank (formerly BofI). Here's the funny thing though - last year I switched from their Refund Transfer option to direct deposit to my own bank account and got my refund almost a week earlier! 😂 The Refund Transfer might seem convenient, but it's basically adding a middleman (and extra days) to your refund journey. Plus, you're paying for that convenience. For gig workers especially, I'd recommend skipping any refund transfer products and just having the IRS deposit directly to your personal account.
Just to add some clarity based on my research: • H&R Block's banking partner is Axos Bank • The Emerald Card is issued by MetaBank • Direct deposit to your own account bypasses H&R Block's banking partners • Refund Transfers add processing time (1-5 days typically) • Refund Advances are loans based on expected refund amount I'd be cautious about any option that adds a middleman between the IRS and your bank account, especially with gig income that might need additional verification.
This is like taking a detour when you could drive straight home. The banking relationship is similar to a toll bridge - sure, you can cross it, but it'll cost you time and money! I was so relieved when I switched to direct deposit last year. Got my refund faster and didn't have to pay the transfer fee. The banking partner (Axos) isn't bad, but why add another step when you don't have to?
Based on everyone's input here, it sounds like H&R Block uses Axos Bank for their refund transfers, but honestly as a fellow freelancer, I'd recommend skipping their banking products altogether. I made the mistake of using a refund transfer service two years ago thinking it would be faster, but it actually delayed my refund by almost a week. The IRS processes everything the same regardless of which tax prep company you use - the real bottleneck is usually on their end, especially with gig income that might trigger additional review. Save yourself the fees and processing delays by just having your refund deposited directly to your own bank account. The tax prep software doesn't really impact refund speed as much as we think it does.
This is really helpful advice, especially the point about gig income potentially triggering additional review. I'm new to freelancing and just filed my first 1099 return - should I be expecting delays because of that? Also, when you say "save yourself the fees," are you referring to the refund transfer fee specifically, or are there other hidden costs I should watch out for when choosing between tax prep services?
I had this exact same question last year! An IRA distribution is literally ANY money coming out of an IRA account - doesn't matter where it goes after. So yes, when u move $ from TIRA to Roth, that's a distribution. The trick is the tax treatment: - Regular withdrawal to your bank account = distribution (taxable + maybe penalties) - TIRA to Roth = distribution + conversion (taxable but no penalties) - IRA to IRA rollover = distribution but not taxable if done properly Report the whole amount on line 4a, and the taxable part on 4b. For backdoor Roth, those are usually the same number unless u had non-deductible contributions.
Hey Sean! I totally get the confusion - I was in the same boat when I first started doing my own taxes. Here's the simple breakdown: Yes, your TIRA to Roth conversion IS considered an IRA distribution and goes on line 4a. Think of it this way - money left your Traditional IRA account, so that's a "distribution" regardless of where it went next. For a backdoor Roth conversion: - Line 4a = total amount that came out of your TIRA - Line 4b = taxable portion of that amount If you made deductible contributions to your TIRA, then 4a and 4b will be the same (fully taxable). If you made non-deductible contributions, you'll need Form 8606 to calculate what portion is taxable. The key thing to remember: an IRA distribution is ANY money leaving an IRA account - whether you pocket it, convert it, or roll it over. The tax treatment varies, but they're all technically distributions. Don't stress too much about triggering an audit - as long as you report the numbers from your 1099-R correctly, you should be fine. The IRA custodian already sent those same numbers to the IRS anyway!
Sofia Peña
Has anyone noticed that the 1098-T forms are NEVER accurate? My school consistently puts payments in Box 1 for the wrong year (showing January payments that I actually made in December of the previous year). It's like they just report when they process the payment rather than when it was actually made.
0 coins
Aaron Boston
•YES! This drives me crazy every year. My university regularly reports spring semester payments in the wrong tax year because they "process" December payments in January. I've learned to always keep my own receipts showing the actual payment dates.
0 coins
Sofia Peña
•Thanks for confirming I'm not the only one dealing with this! It's frustrating because the IRS instructions specifically say to report expenses in the year you pay them, but the schools seem to follow their own system. I've started taking screenshots of all my payment confirmations with dates clearly visible. My tax guy said this is pretty common and that's why they often have to make adjustments to what's reported on the 1098-T.
0 coins
Yuki Nakamura
I'm dealing with a similar situation right now! My wife is in a PhD program and we've been navigating the employer reimbursement timing issue for three years now. One thing I learned that might help - make sure you understand exactly what your husband's employer considers "qualified education expenses" for their reimbursement program. Some employers have stricter definitions than what the IRS allows for education credits. For example, my wife's employer only reimburses tuition and required fees, but not books or lab fees that we can still claim for the Lifetime Learning Credit. This means we need to track which specific expenses will be reimbursed versus which ones we can claim the full credit for. Also, I'd recommend reaching out to your husband's HR department to get a written timeline for when the reimbursement will be processed. Having that documentation helps with tax planning and ensures you're prepared for the recapture calculation in 2024. We've found that being proactive about getting reimbursement status updates makes the whole process much smoother.
0 coins
Amara Chukwu
•This is such great advice about checking what the employer actually considers "qualified expenses"! I never thought about the fact that their definition might be narrower than what the IRS allows for credits. That's a really smart point about books and lab fees potentially being eligible for the credit even if the employer won't reimburse them. It sounds like you need to basically create two separate expense categories - what will be reimbursed versus what you can claim the full credit for. Getting that written timeline from HR is brilliant too. I imagine having documentation of when they expect to process the reimbursement would be super helpful for tax planning. Did you find that HR was cooperative about providing that kind of timeline, or did you have to push for it?
0 coins