


Ask the community...
Sorry this happened to you. Just to add a warning - be extra careful with this. My friend tried to claim stolen crypto as a loss in 2024 and got audited. The IRS made him provide tons of documentation. They're REALLY suspicious about crypto "theft" claims since some people try to use it to avoid taxes. Make sure you have solid proof it was actually stolen!
I went through something very similar last year when my hardware wallet got compromised and $15k in crypto was stolen. Here's what I learned from working with a tax attorney: You absolutely need to report the "sale" on Form 8949 as if you disposed of the crypto on the date it was stolen, but you can also claim a theft loss. The key is having bulletproof documentation - police report, wallet provider confirmation of unauthorized access, transaction logs showing the transfer to unknown addresses, and any communication attempts with exchanges where the thief cashed out. One thing that helped my case was getting a forensic analysis from a blockchain analytics company that traced the stolen funds and showed they were mixed/tumbled, which is classic money laundering behavior thieves use. This cost me about $500 but was worth it during my audit. Also, keep in mind that theft losses are subject to a $100 floor per incident, and you can only deduct the amount that exceeds 10% of your adjusted gross income. So depending on your income, you might not be able to deduct the full loss amount. The process is stressful but doable if you have proper documentation. Don't let the fear of an audit stop you from claiming what you're legally entitled to claim.
This is really helpful information! I'm new to dealing with crypto taxes and this situation sounds terrifying. Can you explain more about what the forensic blockchain analysis involved? Did you have to hire a specific company for that, and how did you find one that the IRS would actually accept as legitimate evidence? Also, when you mention the $100 floor and 10% AGI limitation - does that mean if someone makes $100k annually, they could only deduct theft losses above $10,100?
I completely understand your frustration! As someone who's dealt with S-Corp filings for several years, I can confirm that yes, the penalties apply even when there's no tax liability. The $210 per shareholder per month penalty is automatic under IRC Section 6699. A few key points for your situation: - The penalty starts accruing from the day after the original due date (March 15th for calendar year S-Corps) - It applies for up to 12 months maximum - Drake should calculate this penalty, but definitely verify it manually One thing that might help your client: if they have a clean filing history for the past 3 years, they may qualify for first-time penalty abatement. Also, if there were legitimate circumstances that prevented timely filing (like their previous accountant's issues), they could potentially argue "reasonable cause" for penalty relief. My advice: file the current year return ASAP, and consider submitting a penalty abatement request with a detailed explanation of the circumstances. Even if partially successful, it could save your client hundreds or thousands in penalties.
This is really helpful advice, especially about the first-time penalty abatement option. I had no idea that was available for S-Corps with clean filing histories. Quick question - when you say "clean filing history for the past 3 years," does that mean they need to have filed on time every year, or just that they filed eventually without any major compliance issues? My client's situation with the previous accountant filing late but eventually getting things submitted makes me wonder if they'd still qualify.
Great question! For first-time penalty abatement, the IRS typically looks at whether you've been assessed penalties (not just whether you filed on time). If your client's previous accountant did eventually file and there were no penalties assessed for those late filings, they might still qualify. The key factors the IRS considers for "clean compliance history" are: - No penalties assessed in the prior 3 tax years - All required returns filed (even if late, as long as no penalties were charged) - All taxes paid (or payment arrangements made) Since you mentioned the previous accountant told them "nothing was owed," it's possible no penalties were actually assessed if the IRS accepted reasonable cause arguments or if the filings weren't that late. I'd recommend pulling transcripts for the past 3 years to see exactly what's on record with the IRS before making the abatement request. Even if they don't qualify for first-time abatement, reasonable cause based on reliance on a tax professional who failed to meet deadlines can still be a valid argument for penalty relief.
One thing I'd add that hasn't been mentioned yet - make sure to check if your client's S-Corp election is still valid! If they've been filing late consistently, the IRS might have terminated their S-Corp status without them realizing it. This would mean they'd be taxed as a C-Corp instead, which creates a whole different (and much worse) penalty and tax situation. You can check this by looking at their Entity Classification Election status or calling the IRS Business & Specialty Tax Line. If the S-Corp election was inadvertently terminated due to late filings, you might need to file for relief under Rev. Proc. 2013-30 to get it reinstated. Also, since you're new to Drake for S-Corps, double-check that the software is properly calculating the penalty on the correct number of shareholders. I've seen cases where people forgot to account for spouse shareholders or missed shareholders who only held stock for part of the year. The penalty calculation can get tricky with mid-year ownership changes. Good luck with the filing! The penalties are harsh but there are definitely options for relief if you document everything properly.
This is such an important point that I hadn't even considered! I'm relatively new to handling S-Corp returns and the idea that late filing could actually terminate the S-Corp election is terrifying. How would you know if this has happened? Would the IRS send a notice, or do you only find out when you dig into it? Also, thanks for the tip about double-checking shareholder counts in Drake - that's exactly the kind of detail I'm worried about missing as I learn the software. Is there a specific report or screen in Drake that shows the penalty calculation breakdown so I can verify it's capturing all shareholders correctly?
Has anyone noticed how tax software doesn't handle these weird K1 scenarios very well? I got stuck on the exact same Box 17 AC with multiple years listed. Ended up calling my tax software's support line and they said to just use the most recent year and ignore the others. For any codes without dollar amounts (like your ZZ code), they said to leave them out completely if possible or enter $0 if the software forces you to enter something.
Which tax software are you using? I found TaxAct actually has a decent help section that explains some of these K1 codes, though it didn't specifically address the multiple years in Box 17 AC.
I've been dealing with S-Corp K-1s for several years now and can confirm what others have said - for Box 17 AC with multiple years listed, you only report the most recent year (2024 in your case) on your current tax return. The prior years are there for informational/tracking purposes only. For the ZZ code with "k3 not included" and no dollar amount, this is totally normal. The Schedule K-3 is for international transactions, and if your S-Corp doesn't have any foreign activities, there's no K-3 form to include. When your tax software asks for an amount with code ZZ, you can safely enter $0. This won't cause any issues with the IRS - they understand that some codes are informational only. One tip: make sure to keep a copy of your actual K-1 with your tax records in case there are ever questions later about why certain codes show zero amounts in your return versus what's printed on the form.
This is really helpful advice! I'm new to dealing with S-Corp K-1s and was getting overwhelmed by all the codes and multiple year data. The tip about keeping a copy of the actual K-1 with tax records is something I hadn't thought of but makes total sense. Quick question - when you say "informational/tracking purposes" for the prior years in Box 17 AC, is that mainly for the IRS to see the business growth pattern, or is there some other reason they include multiple years?
Another quick tip - if you're filling out multiple W9s for different clients, make sure you're consistent with how you write your name and business info across all of them. I learned this the hard way when one client's 1099 didn't match my tax return because I abbreviated my middle name on one W9 but wrote it out fully on others. Created a headache during tax season that could have been easily avoided! Also, keep copies of all the W9s you submit. It helps when you're doing your taxes and need to cross-reference with the 1099s you receive.
This is such great advice! I wish I had known this when I started freelancing. I made the exact same mistake with inconsistent name formatting and it caused issues with my tax software not automatically matching up my 1099s. Had to manually enter everything and double-check all the amounts. Quick question - do you recommend creating a standard template or checklist for filling out W9s to make sure you're always consistent? I'm worried I'll make the same mistake again as I take on more clients.
Pro tip from someone who's been filing W9s for years: I actually keep a master document with all my standard info (full legal name exactly as it appears on tax returns, SSN, address, etc.) that I copy from every time I need to fill out a new W9. This ensures I'm always consistent across all forms. I also take a photo or screenshot of each completed W9 before submitting it - way easier than keeping track of physical copies. When tax season comes around, I have a folder on my phone with all my W9s that I can reference when the 1099s start arriving. One more thing - if you ever move or change your name legally, make sure to update ALL your clients with new W9s. Otherwise you'll get 1099s with your old info that won't match your current tax return. Learned that one the hard way too!
This is brilliant! I never thought about keeping a master document - I've been retyping everything from scratch each time and probably making small inconsistencies without realizing it. The photo backup idea is genius too, especially since I'm terrible at organizing paperwork. Quick question about the name changes - does this apply to business name changes too? I'm thinking about switching from using my personal name to a business name for my freelance work, but I have several ongoing clients. Would I need to send updated W9s to everyone even if my SSN stays the same?
Austin Leonard
Has anyone tried using the "Nutshell" series? I heard the "Federal Income Tax in a Nutshell" is pretty good for beginners who want to understand the basics without getting overwhelmed.
0 coins
Anita George
ā¢I used that in law school! It's a great starter book that gives you the big picture concepts. It won't make you a tax expert, but it's perfect for understanding how different pieces of the tax code fit together. The explanations are clear and they use simple examples.
0 coins
Angelica Smith
I'd add "Understanding Federal Income Taxation" by J. Martin Burke and Michael K. Friel to this great list of recommendations. It's specifically designed for people who want to understand tax law conceptually rather than just follow mechanical rules. What sets it apart is how it uses flowcharts and visual aids to break down complex concepts like the realization requirement, basis adjustments, and like-kind exchanges. The authors do a fantastic job explaining the policy rationale behind different tax provisions, which really helps you understand WHY the code works the way it does rather than just memorizing what it says. It's updated regularly and strikes a nice balance between being comprehensive enough for serious study but accessible enough that you won't need a law degree to follow along. The practice problems at the end of each chapter are also really helpful for testing your understanding.
0 coins