IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Yara Khoury

•

Has anyone here used TurboTax when they had a year with workers comp? Did it handle the situation correctly or did you need to make adjustments?

0 coins

I used TurboTax last year after being on workers comp for 7 months. It worked fine because my W2 was already correct - it only showed my regular wages from before my injury. There wasn't anything special I needed to do since workers comp isn't reported on tax returns.

0 coins

Chloe Davis

•

I went through this exact same situation two years ago and it was really confusing at first! The negative W2 wages are completely normal - it's just how payroll systems handle the transition from regular taxable wages to non-taxable workers comp benefits. What probably happened is your employer initially processed some payments as regular wages early in the year, then had to "reverse" or correct those entries once your workers comp status was finalized. The negative numbers you're seeing are essentially the system's way of backing out those wages so they don't incorrectly appear as taxable income on your final W2. Your actual W2 at year-end will show the correct amount of taxable wages you earned (which sounds like it would be zero if you've been on workers comp the entire year). Don't worry about having to explain negative numbers to the IRS - they'll never see those paystub details, just the final corrected totals on your W2 form.

0 coins

This is really helpful, thank you! I'm curious - did you notice any issues when you actually filed your taxes that year? Like did any tax software flag anything unusual about having zero wages on your W2, or did everything process smoothly? I'm just trying to prepare for what to expect during tax season.

0 coins

I've been following this thread closely because I'm dealing with the exact same CP32A situation. What really strikes me is how many of us are in this boat - it seems like the IRS sent out a massive batch of these notices all at once for stimulus payments that were issued months or even over a year ago. One thing I wanted to add that hasn't been mentioned yet - if you're planning to use Form 3911, make sure you select the correct reason code. There's a specific box for "Economic Impact Payment" that's different from regular tax refunds. I initially filled it out wrong and had to resubmit, which cost me an extra few weeks. Also, for anyone considering the third-party services mentioned in this thread, I'd suggest trying the free options first (Form 3911, TAS, persistent phone calling) before paying for help. The IRS will eventually sort this out, it's just a matter of patience and persistence. The most frustrating part about all this is that we're essentially being penalized for the IRS's own system failures. We did everything right by claiming the Recovery Rebate Credit when we didn't receive our payments, and now we're stuck in bureaucratic limbo trying to prove we never got money that was supposedly sent to us. Thanks to everyone who's shared their experiences - it's been really helpful to know what to expect!

0 coins

Dylan Evans

•

Mikayla, you're absolutely right about this feeling like we're being penalized for the IRS's system failures! It's frustrating that so many of us are dealing with identical situations all at once - definitely seems like they had some major processing issues on their end. Thanks for the tip about the correct reason code on Form 3911. That kind of detail could save people weeks of delays. I'm curious - when you resubmitted with the correct "Economic Impact Payment" selection, did you get any acknowledgment that they received it, or did you just have to wait and hope? Your point about trying free options first is really solid advice. While some of the third-party services mentioned here seem legitimate based on people's experiences, it makes sense to exhaust the official channels first, especially since this is ultimately the IRS's responsibility to fix. I'm also documenting everything like Sofia mentioned earlier. At this point I'm treating it like building a case file in case I need to prove later that I made every reasonable effort to resolve this through proper channels.

0 coins

Sofia Torres

•

I'm in the exact same situation and this thread has been incredibly helpful! I received my CP32A notice two weeks ago for the first stimulus payment that I never received and already claimed as a Recovery Rebate Credit on my tax return. After reading everyone's experiences, I've decided to pursue multiple strategies simultaneously. I'm doing the early morning phone calls (thanks for the 7:01am tip, Oliver!), and I've also prepared Form 3911 with the correct "Economic Impact Payment" reason code as Mikayla mentioned. One thing I wanted to add - I called my local IRS office directly instead of the national number, and while they couldn't handle the CP32A issue specifically, they were able to confirm that my tax return is currently on hold pending resolution of this stimulus payment discrepancy. At least now I know why my refund status hasn't updated in weeks. The representative suggested that I might also be able to visit a local Taxpayer Assistance Center in person if the phone and mail routes don't work out. They require appointments, but she said they can sometimes resolve these payment trace issues more quickly than the mail-in process. Thanks to everyone for sharing your experiences and strategies. It's reassuring to know this is resolvable, even if it requires persistence and patience!

0 coins

Amara Chukwu

•

0 coins

Has anyone used one of the Big 4 accounting firms for PE analysis? We're considering hiring one but the fees they quoted were outrageous ($25k+ for an initial assessment).

0 coins

We used Deloitte for our PE evaluation and while it was expensive, they did catch several issues we wouldn't have identified otherwise. For us, the risk of getting it wrong was higher than the consulting fee. If you're a smaller company though, there are regional firms that specialize in international tax that might be more affordable. We initially worked with a mid-sized firm called GT before we grew large enough to need more comprehensive services.

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your experience. The cost definitely seems more justifiable when considering the potential penalties and back taxes if we get it wrong. I'll look into some regional firms too - that's a good suggestion I hadn't considered.

0 coins

Nia Harris

•

This is such a timely discussion! I'm dealing with a similar situation for a UK-based fintech company. One thing I'd add is to be very careful about the "service PE" rules that can apply even without a physical office or dependent agents. If your European company is providing services in the US (like consulting, technical support, or software implementation) and those services are performed for more than 183 days in a 12-month period, you could trigger a service PE under many tax treaties. This is separate from the physical presence or dependent agent tests. Also, be aware that some activities that seem "preparatory or auxiliary" might not qualify for treaty protection if they're core to your business model. For a tech company, activities like customer onboarding, technical support, or customization services could be considered core business functions even if performed by contractors. The key is documenting everything - keep detailed records of what activities your US contractors are performing, their authority levels, and duration of services. This documentation will be crucial if you ever need to defend your position to tax authorities.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

This is incredibly helpful, thank you! The service PE rule is something I hadn't heard about before. For our European tech company, we do have contractors providing technical implementation services for US clients. How exactly is the 183-day threshold calculated - is it per contractor individually, or aggregate across all service activities? Also, regarding the documentation you mentioned - are there specific formats or details the IRS expects to see in these records? I want to make sure we're capturing the right information from the start rather than scrambling to recreate it later if questioned. The distinction between preparatory/auxiliary vs core business functions is particularly concerning since our main value proposition is the customized implementation work our contractors do. This sounds like it could definitely be considered core to our business model.

0 coins

Nasira Ibanez

•

Great questions! The 183-day rule is typically calculated on an aggregate basis across all service activities, not per individual contractor. So if you have multiple contractors providing services, their days get combined when determining if you've crossed the threshold. However, the specific calculation method can vary depending on which tax treaty applies - some treaties have different rules for how to count days and what activities qualify. For documentation, while there's no official IRS format, you'll want to maintain detailed records showing: (1) specific dates and duration of services, (2) exact nature of work performed by each contractor, (3) their authority levels and decision-making power, (4) client interactions and contract negotiation involvement, and (5) any fixed locations used for the work. Time logs, work orders, and contract amendments are particularly valuable. You're absolutely right to be concerned about the core vs auxiliary distinction. Customized implementation work for a tech company would very likely be considered core business activity rather than auxiliary. This means you probably can't rely on the "preparatory or auxiliary" exception in most tax treaties. You might want to consider restructuring how these services are delivered - perhaps having the European entity provide remote oversight while using truly independent US contractors, or establishing a clear subsidiary structure if the volume justifies it.

0 coins

Ryder Greene

•

I went through a similar situation last year with I-Bonds and education planning. One thing that wasn't mentioned yet is the timing strategy for bonds approaching final maturity. If any of your I-Bonds are getting close to their 30-year final maturity date, you'll be forced to recognize all the interest income in that tax year regardless of your plans. Also, don't overlook the potential benefits of keeping some I-Bonds as part of your overall financial strategy. Even though you can't roll them tax-free into a 529, I-Bonds still offer inflation protection and tax deferral that you lose once you cash them out. For your daughter's college timeline (she's 12 now, so college in about 6 years), you might want to calculate whether the guaranteed returns and tax deferral of keeping the bonds outweigh the potential growth in a 529 plan, especially given current market conditions. Sometimes the "tax-efficient" move isn't always the most financially beneficial move overall.

0 coins

AstroAce

•

This is a really good point about the timing and overall strategy. I'm curious - when you did your calculations comparing keeping the I-Bonds versus moving to a 529, what factors did you weigh most heavily? I'm trying to think through whether the guaranteed inflation protection is worth giving up the potential for higher returns in a 529, especially since we have about 6 years before needing the money. Did you factor in the state tax benefits of 529 contributions in your analysis?

0 coins

One strategy you might want to consider is a phased approach rather than cashing out all your I-Bonds at once. Since you have bonds in multiple names and presumably different purchase dates, you could strategically redeem them over several years to manage the tax impact. For the bonds in your and your husband's names, you could cash out the older ones first (assuming they have lower interest rates) and reinvest in a 529 plan to start getting tax-free growth on future earnings. For your daughter's bonds, as others mentioned, those need to be used for her benefit, but a 529 with her as beneficiary would qualify. Also consider your state's 529 plan benefits - many states offer tax deductions for contributions that could partially offset the federal tax hit from cashing out the I-Bonds. The state tax savings might make the overall strategy more attractive than it appears at first glance. Since you're in a higher income bracket, you might also want to look at whether spreading the bond redemptions across multiple tax years could help avoid pushing you into an even higher tax bracket in any single year. The tax software or professional advice mentioned by others could help you model different scenarios to find the optimal timing.

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

This phased approach makes a lot of sense, especially for managing the tax impact. I'm wondering about the timing coordination between state 529 deductions and federal I-Bond interest recognition. If I redeem bonds in December and contribute to my state's 529 plan in the same tax year, would that help offset some of the federal tax hit? Also, do you know if there are any restrictions on how quickly you can contribute to a 529 after redeeming other investments, or can it be done immediately? I want to make sure I don't miss any deadlines for state tax benefits while trying to optimize this strategy.

0 coins

As someone who went through this exact same situation two years ago, I can confirm what everyone else is saying - you're actually in great shape! My husband and I both forgot to update our W-4s after getting married and were withholding as single all year. We were terrified we'd owe a huge amount. Turns out we got back almost $4,000! Our tax preparer explained that the single withholding rate is much more aggressive than married withholding, so we had essentially been overpaying taxes all year long. When we filed married filing jointly, we qualified for better tax brackets and a higher standard deduction, which made our refund even larger. The key thing to remember is that your actual tax liability is based on your marital status on December 31st, not what your W-4 said during the year. The W-4 just determines how much gets taken out of each paycheck - it's basically just an estimate. Your actual taxes are calculated when you file your return. Make sure to update your W-4s now for 2025 so you don't overpay again this year, but for 2024 you should be expecting money back rather than owing. Congratulations on your marriage, and don't stress about this - it's one of the most common "mistakes" that actually works out in your favor!

0 coins

Emma Swift

•

Wow, $4,000 back is amazing! That really puts things in perspective. I've been stressing about this for weeks thinking we made some terrible financial mistake, but it sounds like we accidentally did ourselves a favor. Your explanation about the W-4 being just an estimate versus the actual tax calculation when filing makes so much sense. I never really understood that distinction before. It's crazy how something that felt like such a big screw-up on our part actually worked out to be beneficial. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's so reassuring to hear from someone who went through the exact same thing. We'll definitely get those W-4s updated right away for 2025. This whole thread has been incredibly helpful and has turned my tax season anxiety into excitement about potentially getting a nice refund!

0 coins

Just wanted to chime in as another data point - my partner and I made this exact same "mistake" when we got married in 2022! We were both withholding as single the entire year and were absolutely panicking when tax season rolled around. Ended up getting a refund of over $3,500 when we filed married filing jointly. Our CPA laughed and said this is probably the most common "happy accident" she sees with newlyweds. The single withholding tables are designed to take out more tax because single filers don't get the benefit of the wider married tax brackets. With your combined income around $145k, you're in the perfect sweet spot where married filing jointly will give you significant advantages over what you would have paid as two single filers. Plus you've been overpaying all year through your withholding! The only downside is you've essentially given the government an interest-free loan, but hey - at least it's better than owing! Definitely update those W-4s for 2025 though so you can keep more of your money in your own pockets throughout the year rather than waiting for a big refund.

0 coins

Prev1...15521553155415551556...5643Next