IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I'm in the exact same boat as you! Just switched to S-corp about 6 weeks ago and was totally overwhelmed by all the payroll options. After reading through everyone's suggestions here, I'm leaning toward either Patriot Payroll (love that $21/month price point) or maybe trying the DIY approach with a good spreadsheet system. One thing I learned from my accountant is that you really want to get your payroll set up ASAP since the IRS expects consistent payments throughout the year. Waiting too long and then trying to catch up with back-dated payroll can look suspicious and cause headaches. Has anyone dealt with setting up the actual business bank account requirements for payroll? My bank is asking about payroll tax accounts and I'm not sure if I need a separate account or if my regular business checking will work for the tax deposits.

0 coins

Tami Morgan

•

Great question about the bank account setup! You typically don't need a separate account just for payroll tax deposits - your regular business checking account should work fine. Most banks can handle the electronic tax payments (EFTPS) directly from your main business account. However, I'd recommend calling your bank to confirm they support electronic federal tax payments and ask if there are any special requirements or fees. Some banks require you to enroll in their business online banking system to make the tax deposits, while others might have specific routing procedures. Also, since you mentioned being 6 weeks in - definitely get that payroll started soon! The IRS really does prefer to see consistent quarterly payments rather than a big catch-up at the end of the year. Even if you're still deciding between services, you could start with something simple like Patriot just to get compliant, then switch later if needed.

0 coins

Zara Khan

•

As someone who just went through this transition last year, I'd strongly recommend getting your payroll set up within the next week or two. The IRS really doesn't like seeing irregular payment patterns in your first S-corp year - it can trigger unwanted attention. For budget-friendly options, I'd echo the Patriot Payroll recommendation at $21/month. I actually started with them and found their interface really straightforward for beginners. The customer service was patient with all my newbie questions too. One thing I wish someone had told me earlier: whatever salary you decide on, try to stick with it consistently throughout the year rather than adjusting it quarterly based on business performance. The IRS prefers predictable W-2 wages. You can always take additional distributions if you have a good quarter. Also, don't forget to register for an EFTPS account with the IRS for your tax deposits - most payroll services will handle this automatically, but it's good to understand the process. Good luck with your first year as an S-corp!

0 coins

Freya Collins

•

This is really helpful advice about consistency! I'm curious though - when you say "stick with the same salary throughout the year," does that mean I should calculate what I expect to make for the full year and then divide that by 12? Or should I be more conservative and base it on guaranteed income only? My consulting business has some seasonal fluctuations, so I'm not sure how to handle that when setting up a consistent monthly salary.

0 coins

Payton Black

•

Don't forget about quarterly estimated tax payments if you start making decent money from your books! I didn't do this my first year and got hit with penalties. If you expect to owe more than $1,000 in taxes from your publishing income, you need to make quarterly payments. The IRS Form 1040-ES helps calculate these. The deadlines are April 15, June 15, September 15, and January 15 of the following year. Also, remember you'll be paying self-employment tax (15.3%) on top of your regular income tax rate. This catches a lot of new authors by surprise!

0 coins

Harold Oh

•

One workaround for the quarterly payments is to increase the withholding on your W-2 job to cover the additional taxes from your publishing income. That way you don't have to worry about making separate quarterly payments. You can file a new W-4 with your employer to increase withholding.

0 coins

Ava Harris

•

Great advice throughout this thread! As someone who's been self-publishing for a few years, I'd add one more important point: consider opening a Solo 401(k) for your publishing business income. Since you're already earning W-2 income from your day job, you can still contribute to a Solo 401(k) based on your self-employment earnings from book sales. This allows you to shelter a significant portion of your publishing profits from taxes - you can contribute up to 25% of your net self-employment income (or 20% if you calculate it precisely). For 2025, the contribution limit is $70,000 total, though most new authors won't hit that. The Solo 401(k) is especially powerful because contributions reduce your taxable income dollar-for-dollar. So if you make $10,000 profit from book sales, you could potentially contribute $2,000 to the Solo 401(k), reducing your taxable self-employment income to $8,000. You still pay self-employment tax on the full amount, but you save on income tax. Just make sure your publishing activity qualifies as a legitimate business (sounds like yours does) and that you're showing a profit motive. The IRS wants to see that you're trying to make money, not just pursuing a hobby.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful information about the Solo 401(k)! I had no idea that was even possible with self-employment income. Since I'm just starting out, I probably won't hit those contribution limits right away, but it's great to know this option exists as my publishing business grows. One question - do I need to wait until I'm showing consistent profits before setting up a Solo 401(k), or can I establish it right away even if my first year might be mostly expenses with minimal income? I'm expecting to invest heavily upfront in editing, cover design, and marketing before I see much return. Also, are there any specific providers you'd recommend for setting up a Solo 401(k) that work well with small publishing businesses? I want to make sure I choose something that won't have excessive fees eating into my modest profits.

0 coins

Just to add to this conversation - I've been a 1099 contractor for schools for 7 years now. Make sure you're tracking your quarters of coverage for Social Security! You need 40 quarters (10 years) of coverage to qualify for retirement benefits. For 2025, you need to earn $1,820 in a quarter and pay self-employment tax on it to get credit for that quarter. If you earn $7,280 or more for the year and pay your self-employment taxes, you'll get credit for all four quarters even if you only worked part of the year.

0 coins

Jayden Hill

•

Is there a way to check how many quarters I've already accumulated? I've worked a mix of W-2 and 1099 jobs over the years and have no idea where I stand.

0 coins

Caden Turner

•

Yes! You can check your quarters of coverage by creating an account at ssa.gov and viewing your Social Security Statement. It shows your complete earnings history year by year, including both W-2 and 1099 income where you paid Social Security taxes. The statement also tells you exactly how many quarters you've earned and estimates your future benefits based on your current earnings record. It's really helpful to review this annually to make sure all your income is being properly credited, especially with 1099 work where you're responsible for paying the self-employment taxes.

0 coins

NeonNebula

•

Your tax preparer was definitely trying to upsell you unnecessary services! As everyone has confirmed, when you pay self-employment tax on your 1099-NEC income, you ARE contributing to Social Security - exactly 12.4% of your net earnings goes toward Social Security and 2.9% toward Medicare. I went through this same confusion a few years ago when I started contracting. The key thing to understand is that you're paying both the employee AND employer portions of Social Security taxes (hence the 15.3% total), but you get to deduct half of that self-employment tax on your return, which helps offset some of the burden. You don't need an EIN or payroll setup just to contribute to Social Security. That would only make sense if you were considering an S-Corp election to potentially save on self-employment taxes, but at your income level, the added complexity and costs probably aren't worth it. Keep filing your Schedule C and Schedule SE as you have been - you're doing everything correctly! Your 1099 income is building your Social Security credits just like W-2 income would.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful clarification! I'm just starting out as a contractor myself and had similar worries after meeting with a tax preparer who made it sound like I needed all these complex business structures. It's reassuring to know that the Schedule C and SE approach is legitimate and actually does build Social Security credits. Quick question - when you mention deducting half the self-employment tax, does that happen automatically when filing or is it something I need to calculate separately?

0 coins

For the student loan aspect - which I'm guessing is why y'all are filing separately - make sure you really run the numbers! Sometimes the tax benefits of filing jointly outweigh the student loan payment savings. My wife and I were in a similar boat (about 220k vs 85k incomes) and we found that we saved more overall by filing jointly and just paying the higher loan payment. Totally depends on how much debt, interest rates, and how close to forgiveness you are though.

0 coins

Ethan Davis

•

This is great advice. We did the same calculation and found joint filing was better for us once we factored in the lost credits from filing separately. The Child and Dependent Care Credit alone (which you can't claim when filing separately) was worth more than 3 months of the higher student loan payments!

0 coins

Avery Saint

•

Great question! As someone who's navigated this exact scenario, here are the key factors to consider: **Tax Credits:** With your income levels, you'll want to calculate who can still qualify for the Child Tax Credit. The phase-out begins at $200k for single/MFS filers, so your spouse at $98k would likely get the full $2,000 per child credit, while you might be partially or fully phased out. **Student Loan Impact:** This is huge! Whoever claims the kids will have a larger household size for IDR calculations, which typically means lower monthly payments. Given that your spouse is the one with student loans, having them claim the children could significantly reduce their monthly obligation. **Head of Household:** Since you lived together, neither of you can file as Head of Household, so you're both stuck with MFS rates. **My recommendation:** Have your spouse claim both children. They'll likely get better tax benefits due to income limits, AND it will help with the student loan payments by increasing their household size for IDR purposes. Definitely run the numbers both ways to be sure, but in most cases with your income split, the lower earner claiming dependents works out better overall when you factor in both tax savings and loan payment reductions.

0 coins

This is really helpful! I'm new to this community but facing a similar situation. Quick question - when you mention the Child Tax Credit phase-out at $200k for MFS filers, is that based on AGI or modified AGI? And does the phase-out happen gradually or is it a cliff? I'm trying to understand if someone making just over $200k would still get partial credit or lose it completely. Also, do you know if there are any other credits that might be affected by who claims the dependents in an MFS situation?

0 coins

Diego Flores

•

Great discussion everyone! I want to emphasize something that might not be immediately obvious to newcomers - the IRS actually designed Form 1040 this way (with the "a" and "b" line pairs) for audit purposes and to ensure proper tax calculation. The "a" lines capture your total income received, which the IRS can cross-reference with the 1099s and other tax documents they receive from financial institutions. The "b" lines show what you're actually claiming as taxable, which is what gets used in calculating your tax liability. This dual reporting system helps catch discrepancies. For example, if you report $10,000 total interest on line 2a but the IRS has 1099-INT forms totaling $12,000, that's going to trigger questions. Similarly, if your taxable amount on line 2b seems inconsistent with typical tax-exempt vs taxable interest ratios, they might want documentation. One practical tip: when you're preparing your return, always start by adding up all your 1099 forms first to get your "a" line totals, then work backwards to determine the taxable portions for the "b" lines. Don't try to estimate or use round numbers - use the exact figures from your tax documents. This approach will save you headaches if the IRS ever has questions about your return.

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

This is such an insightful perspective on the audit trail aspect! I never really thought about WHY the IRS structured the form with these paired lines, but it makes perfect sense from their verification standpoint. Your tip about starting with the 1099 forms to get the "a" line totals first is brilliant - it's like building from the foundation up rather than trying to guess and work backwards. I can see how that systematic approach would prevent a lot of the confusion that leads to errors. The point about using exact figures rather than estimates is especially important. I imagine many people (myself included) might be tempted to round numbers or use "close enough" amounts, but as you pointed out, any discrepancies between what you report and what financial institutions report to the IRS could trigger unwanted attention. Thanks for sharing this behind-the-scenes insight into how the IRS cross-references information - it really helps me understand the bigger picture of why accurate reporting on these line pairs is so crucial!

0 coins

AstroAlpha

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone who's been struggling with these same Form 1040 line pairs, I really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences and explanations. I had the exact same confusion as the original poster - I was thinking that if I had $10,000 in interest income with half being tax-exempt, I'd put $5,000 on line 2a and $5,000 on line 2b. Now I understand that line 2a gets the FULL $10,000 (total received) and line 2b gets only the taxable portion ($5,000 in this example). What really clicked for me was @Diego's explanation about the audit trail - it makes so much sense that the IRS wants to see both the total amount you received (which they can verify against 1099 forms) AND the amount you're claiming as taxable. This dual reporting system is actually pretty clever from a verification standpoint. I'm definitely going to follow the advice about gathering all my 1099 forms first to get accurate totals for the "a" lines, then calculating the taxable portions for the "b" lines. No more guessing with percentages or round numbers - I'll use the exact figures from my tax documents. Thanks everyone for turning what seemed like an impossible puzzle into something I can actually understand and complete correctly!

0 coins

I'm so glad this thread exists! I just joined this community because I'm in the exact same boat with my 2025 tax prep. Reading through everyone's explanations has been like having a lightbulb moment - I was making the same mistake of thinking the "a" and "b" lines were split amounts rather than total vs. taxable. The audit trail explanation from @Diego really opened my eyes to why the IRS structures these forms this way. It's not just arbitrary - there's actually a logical system behind it that helps them verify our returns against the 1099s they receive. I'm curious though - for someone who's new to dealing with multiple income types like this, is there a particular order you'd recommend tackling these line pairs? Should I start with the simpler ones like interest and dividends before moving on to the more complex calculations for Social Security and retirement distributions? Or does it matter as long as I'm using the right figures from my tax documents? Thanks again to everyone who shared their knowledge here - this community is amazing for helping newcomers like me navigate these confusing tax situations!

0 coins

Prev1...13961397139813991400...5643Next