Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I've been through this exact situation multiple times with Cash App for tax refunds, and I can definitely put your mind at ease! The "pending" status you're seeing is actually the best possible sign - it means Cash App has received the electronic notification from the IRS that your refund is being processed and will arrive on your DDD. Here's what's happening: When the IRS processes your return and assigns a Direct Deposit Date, they don't wait until that date to notify your bank. They send an advance notice (called an ACH pre-notification) to Cash App several days beforehand. This is what triggers the "pending" status you're seeing. Cash App is unique compared to traditional banks because they actually show you this pending status, whereas most banks don't display anything until the funds actually arrive. So you're getting visibility into a step of the process that you normally wouldn't see! Based on your March 4th DDD, you should expect to see the full $3,850 available in your Cash App account early morning on March 4th - typically between 4-6 AM. Cash App often releases tax refunds right on schedule, sometimes even a few hours early. The key thing is that "pending" means everything is working correctly. If there were any issues with your routing/account numbers or name matching, you wouldn't see pending at all - the deposit would just fail. So you can relax knowing your refund is definitely on its way!
This is exactly what I needed to hear! I've been driving myself crazy checking Cash App every few hours since seeing that pending status. It's so helpful to understand that this is actually a normal part of the process and not something to worry about. I had no idea that Cash App shows you the pre-notification stage while other banks keep you in the dark until the money actually hits. Your explanation about the ACH pre-notification makes perfect sense - I was confused about how Cash App could know about my refund before the IRS had supposedly sent it. Now I understand they're just at different stages of the same process. Setting my alarm for 5am on March 4th and trying not to stress until then! Thanks for taking the time to explain this so clearly.
I'm going through this exact same situation right now! Filed my taxes through TaxSlayer about 10 days ago, got my DDD for March 10th on WMR, but Cash App has been showing "pending" for the past 4 days. I was honestly starting to freak out thinking something went wrong with my direct deposit information. Reading through all these comments has been such a huge relief - I had no idea that the pending status actually meant Cash App received advance notice from the IRS! I thought pending meant there was some kind of problem or delay. My refund is $2,650 and I've been obsessively checking the app probably every hour, which I now realize was completely unnecessary stress. It's so helpful to understand that this is actually how the process is supposed to work. The fact that Cash App shows you this behind-the-scenes step that other banks hide is actually pretty cool once you know what it means. Based on everyone's experiences here, it sounds like I just need to wait until my DDD and check around 5-6am when Cash App typically releases the funds. Thanks to everyone who shared their stories - this community has saved my sanity! I'll definitely update here once my refund comes through to help future anxious filers like myself.
Join the conversation
That sounds about right for your income and family size! With 44k income and 2 kids, you'd qualify for substantial EITC (around $6-7k) plus Child Tax Credit. The IRS has been processing a lot of adjustments from prior year credits too. Just make sure all your info matches what you filed - income, dependents, etc. If everything checks out on your transcript, you should be good to go! 🙌
Join the conversation
Reading through all these responses, I'm struck by how this tax situation essentially punishes people for playing responsibly. The irony is that if you're a problem gambler who loses everything quickly, you have fewer transactions to track. But if you're disciplined, set limits, and play strategically like OP did, you get buried in paperwork. The real kicker is that this system actively discourages the kind of gambling behavior that regulators should want to see - measured play with good record keeping. Instead, it rewards reckless gambling patterns where people deposit large amounts, lose quickly, and have minimal transactions to report. I've been through this nightmare myself with poker tournaments. Won a few small tournaments totaling maybe $3,000 profit for the year, but had to document thousands of buy-ins, rebuys, and cash-outs across multiple platforms. The time investment in tax prep literally made my hourly rate from poker negative. The most frustrating part is that Congress could fix this tomorrow by allowing net gambling income reporting for recreational players, similar to how investment gains/losses are handled. But gambling is still treated like it's 1960 and everyone plays exclusively in physical casinos with simple win/loss documentation. Until this changes, online gambling is basically a tax preparation business disguised as entertainment.
This is such an insightful way to frame the problem! You're absolutely right that the current system essentially punishes responsible gambling behavior while inadvertently rewarding reckless play from a paperwork perspective. Your poker tournament example really drives this point home. It's absurd that skilled, strategic play that requires careful bankroll management and detailed record-keeping gets penalized with massive administrative overhead, while someone who deposits $5,000, loses it all in an hour, and walks away actually has the simplest tax situation. The comparison to investment gains/losses is spot-on. If I buy and sell stocks 100 times in a year and end up with a $500 net gain, I report $500 in capital gains. I don't have to itemize every single profitable trade as "investment winnings" while separately deducting my losses. The fact that gambling income isn't treated the same way is completely illogical. What really gets me is that this antiquated approach probably costs the IRS more in audit resources and taxpayer services than it generates in additional revenue. They're creating a compliance nightmare that benefits nobody - not the taxpayers, not the government, and certainly not the legitimate gambling industry that has to deal with confused customers. Until we get sensible reform, I guess we're all just reluctant participants in this bureaucratic casino where the house always wins through paperwork alone.
This entire thread perfectly captures why I've become a reluctant expert in tax law despite just wanting to play some online poker and slots occasionally. What strikes me most is how the IRS has created a system that's almost designed to be incomprehensible to regular people. I went through something similar last year - ended up with a net profit of about $1,200 but had to report over $28,000 in "gambling winnings" and then itemize $26,800 in losses. Lost my standard deduction and ended up owing more in taxes than if I had just lost the money outright. The absurdity is mind-blowing. What really bothers me is that there's no educational resources from the IRS about this. They'll audit you for getting it wrong, but they won't explain how to get it right. I had to piece together information from forums like this, conflicting advice from different tax preparers, and hours of research just to file my return. The bonus situation you described is particularly insane. You're essentially being taxed on turnover, not profit. It's like being required to pay income tax on your gross salary before any deductions, but then being allowed to "deduct" the money you spent on rent and food - except you lose your standard deduction for the privilege. At this point I think the only winning move is what several people mentioned - just avoid online gambling entirely until Congress fixes this mess. The entertainment value isn't worth becoming an unpaid IRS compliance specialist.
Join the conversation
As someone who's been through multiple IRS audits, I want to add a practical perspective here. Yes, you CAN deduct a Ferrari for legitimate business use, but let me tell you what actually happens when you do. First, that return is getting flagged. Period. High-value vehicle deductions on business returns get extra attention, especially if your other business expenses seem modest in comparison. Second, be prepared to prove EVERYTHING. I had a client who bought a Porsche for his financial advisory practice (legitimately used for client meetings). During audit, the IRS wanted: - Complete mileage logs for 2 full years - Proof of business meetings for every logged trip - Client testimonials about how the vehicle enhanced business relationships - Evidence that he had a separate personal vehicle - Documentation showing the business necessity vs. alternatives The audit took 18 months and cost more in professional fees than the tax savings. He kept the deduction, but barely broke even after legal costs. My advice? If you're going to do this, treat it like you're already being audited from day one. Document everything obsessively, and make sure the business benefit genuinely justifies both the limited tax savings and the inevitable scrutiny. Sometimes the best tax strategy is the one that doesn't paint a target on your back.
This real-world perspective is incredibly valuable, thank you for sharing! The 18-month audit timeline and professional fees eating up the tax savings is exactly the kind of hidden cost most people don't consider. Quick question - when you mention treating it "like you're already being audited from day one," are there specific documentation practices or software tools you'd recommend? I'm thinking beyond just basic mileage tracking - maybe something that integrates GPS data with calendar appointments to automatically link trips to business purposes? Also, did your client's audit experience reveal any particular "red flags" the IRS focuses on with luxury vehicle deductions that might not be obvious to someone setting this up initially?
@ff4760cb8215 This is exactly why I always tell my clients to think twice before getting too creative with luxury vehicle deductions. The juice often isn't worth the squeeze when you factor in audit risk and professional fees. For documentation, I recommend apps like Everlance or TripLog that use GPS to automatically track mileage and let you categorize trips in real-time. Some integrate with calendar apps to pull meeting details automatically. The key is contemporaneous records - logging trips weeks later looks suspicious to auditors. Red flags from that audit included: inconsistent personal vs business use patterns (like claiming 90% business use but taking family vacation trips), round numbers in mileage logs (looked fabricated), and inability to explain specific business purposes for logged trips. The IRS also scrutinized whether client meetings actually required that specific vehicle vs. a standard car. One thing that really helped my client was having written client feedback about how the vehicle positively impacted their business relationship. Sounds silly, but it proved legitimate business purpose beyond just transportation. Bottom line: if your business genuinely benefits and you're meticulous with records, it can work. But most people underestimate the administrative burden and audit risk.
This thread has been incredibly educational! I'm a small business consultant and I've had several clients ask me this exact question over the years. What I find most valuable here is the emphasis on documentation and legitimate business purpose rather than just the "can you or can't you" debate. One thing I'd add for anyone considering this: think about your industry and client base first. If you're a plumber or HVAC contractor, showing up in a Ferrari might actually hurt your business because clients could think you're overcharging them. But if you're in luxury real estate, wealth management, or high-end consulting, it could genuinely enhance your professional image and client relationships. The former IRS auditor's point about having a separate personal vehicle really resonates. It shows clear intent to separate business and personal use, which goes a long way in demonstrating legitimacy to the IRS. For those still considering it: run the numbers first. With the luxury auto depreciation caps limiting your deduction to roughly $19K in year one regardless of the car's cost, you're looking at maybe $4-6K in actual tax savings (depending on your tax bracket). Factor in increased insurance costs, potential audit expenses, and the time investment in meticulous record-keeping. Sometimes a certified pre-owned luxury sedan gives you 80% of the professional image benefit at 40% of the cost and audit risk. The key takeaway? Yes, it's legal when done properly, but make sure the business case justifies both the financial investment and the administrative burden.
Freya Larsen
As a newcomer to this community, I'm blown away by the quality of this discussion! When I first saw the 7% IRS interest rate mentioned in the original post, my immediate reaction was similar to Adriana's - it seemed like there might be an opportunity to earn better returns than traditional savings accounts. However, after reading through everyone's contributions, it's clear that this strategy has far too many practical limitations to be viable. The 45-day grace period alone fundamentally changes the math, and when you add in the taxability of interest, liquidity constraints, and potential compliance issues, it becomes obvious why legitimate investment vehicles exist. What I find most valuable about this thread is the combination of technical expertise and real-world experience. Having tax professionals explain the regulations while community members share their actual experiences with overpayments creates such a comprehensive picture. The tools mentioned - taxr.ai for analyzing tax documents and Claimyr for reaching the IRS - seem like genuinely useful resources that I never would have discovered otherwise. This discussion perfectly illustrates why community knowledge sharing is so powerful. A question that seemed reasonable on the surface was thoroughly examined from multiple angles, revealing all the hidden complications that make the strategy impractical. It's a great reminder that the most effective financial strategies are usually the most transparent and straightforward ones. Thanks to everyone who took the time to share their expertise and experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical tax education I was hoping to find here!
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•Freya, you've really summed up what makes this discussion so exceptional! As another newcomer, I'm impressed by how the community turned what could have been a simple "yes/no" question into such a thorough educational experience. What strikes me most is how everyone approached this with genuine curiosity rather than dismissiveness. Even though the 7% rate strategy ultimately doesn't work, the process of exploring why it doesn't work taught me so much about how the IRS interest system actually functions, tax implications I'd never considered, and the importance of understanding opportunity costs. The real-world examples really brought the theory to life - from Nathaniel's accidental overpayment experience to Jasmine's journey from skepticism to actually using Claimyr successfully. These concrete stories make the abstract concepts much more understandable and memorable. This thread has also made me realize how valuable it is to have access to tools like taxr.ai and Claimyr. Dealing with the IRS can be so opaque and frustrating, so having resources that can help decode documents or actually reach a human agent seems invaluable. Thanks for helping synthesize all the key insights, and thanks to everyone who contributed their knowledge and experiences. This is the kind of collaborative learning environment that makes joining communities like this so worthwhile!
0 coins
Chloe Wilson
As a newcomer to this community, I'm incredibly grateful for this thorough and educational discussion! Like many others here, I initially saw that 7% interest rate and thought "wow, that's better than my savings account" - but this thread has been a masterclass in why you need to look beyond headline numbers. The collective wisdom shared here is remarkable. From Jace's technical breakdown of the 45-day rule to the real-world experiences from folks like Nathaniel, Kristian, and even Jasmine's evolution from skeptic to convert regarding the Claimyr service - every contribution added valuable perspective. What really stands out is how this demonstrates the importance of understanding systems as they're designed to function rather than trying to exploit them for unintended purposes. The IRS interest system exists to compensate taxpayers for processing delays, not to serve as an investment vehicle. When you factor in the grace period, taxability, liquidity issues, and potential scrutiny, it becomes clear why purpose-built financial products (Treasury securities, high-yield savings, I-bonds) are better choices. I'm definitely saving the tool recommendations - taxr.ai for transcript analysis and Claimyr for IRS contact - as these seem like genuinely useful resources for navigating tax complexities. This is exactly the kind of practical, experience-based advice that makes community discussions so valuable. Thanks to everyone who shared their expertise and real-world experiences!
0 coins