Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Great question! Since you built the PC before starting your job, you can still potentially deduct the business portion, but there are some important things to keep in mind. First, you'll need to determine what percentage of time you use the computer for work versus gaming. If you're working part-time and also gaming regularly, you might be looking at something like 30-40% business use. Whatever percentage you claim, make sure you can document it with actual usage tracking. Since your PC cost $2,200, you'll likely need to depreciate it over 5 years rather than taking the full deduction at once. So if you determine 40% business use, that's $880 depreciated over 5 years, or about $176 per year. The depreciation would start from when you began using it for work (last week), not when you originally purchased it. This is called the "placed in service" date for business purposes. One important caveat: if you're a W-2 employee, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated most unreimbursed employee expense deductions through 2025. These deductions are only available if you're self-employed or an independent contractor filing Schedule C. Before going the deduction route, I'd suggest checking with your employer about any home office stipends or equipment reimbursement programs - many companies offer these now for remote workers and it's often simpler than tax deductions!
This is exactly the kind of detailed breakdown I was hoping for! The timing aspect makes total sense - starting depreciation from when I actually began using it for work rather than the original purchase date. One follow-up question: you mentioned tracking usage with documentation. Would something like a simple spreadsheet showing daily work hours versus gaming hours be sufficient? Or does the IRS expect more formal tracking methods? I want to make sure I'm doing this right from the start since I just started the job. Also, I'll definitely check with my employer about any home office programs. Even if they don't have anything formal, it's worth asking since remote work setups are becoming so common. Thanks for the comprehensive advice!
A simple spreadsheet tracking daily work hours versus gaming hours would definitely be sufficient for IRS documentation purposes! You don't need anything fancy - just dates, work hours, and personal use hours. Even a basic log showing "worked 4 hours, gamed 3 hours" type entries will demonstrate your business use percentage over time. The key is consistency and reasonableness. If you track for a representative period (like a month or two) and establish a pattern, that's usually enough to support your claimed percentage. Just make sure your records match what you actually report on your taxes. Since you're just starting the job, this is actually perfect timing to begin tracking from day one. It'll give you clean documentation showing exactly when business use began and what your actual usage patterns are. Much easier than trying to recreate records after the fact! And definitely do ask about employer reimbursement programs. Even if they don't have a formal policy, many companies are willing to work something out for remote employees, especially if you present it professionally with documentation of what equipment you're using for work.
Join the conversation
Has anyone tried just reporting the W-2 as-is but attaching an explanation letter? My tax guy suggested doing that instead of Form 4852 because he said it's less likely to trigger a review.
I wouldn't recommend that approach. An explanation letter doesn't have any official status with the IRS. Form 4852 is specifically designed for correcting W-2 errors and is the proper way to handle this situation. If you file with an incorrect W-2 and just attach a letter, your tax return will still be processed based on the incorrect information. This could potentially cause problems later, especially if the amounts affect other calculations on your return.
I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now! My employer's payroll company miscategorized my HSA contributions as taxable income instead of pre-tax deductions. It's so frustrating when these third-party payroll companies make errors and then take forever to fix them. Based on what I've learned from my own research and talking to a tax professional, I'd definitely recommend going with the Form 4852 option that others mentioned. It's the official IRS form designed exactly for this type of situation, and it gives you a paper trail showing you made a good faith effort to correct the error. One thing I'd add is to make sure you calculate the tax impact of the error before deciding how urgent this is. In your case, having health insurance and FSA contributions wrongly categorized as dependent care benefits could affect your eligibility for certain deductions or credits. The dependent care category has different tax treatment and limits, so it's definitely worth fixing rather than filing as-is. Also, don't feel bad about being the "squeaky wheel" with HR if this drags on much longer. April 15th isn't that far away, and you shouldn't have to file an extension because of their payroll company's mistake. Sometimes a little pressure is exactly what's needed to get these things resolved.
Join the conversation
I've been following this discussion closely as I'm dealing with my own IRC 1341 situation. My former employer accidentally included me in a retention bonus payout in late 2022 even though I had already given notice and wasn't eligible. I had to repay $4,800 in 2023. Reading through everyone's experiences, I think I made some mistakes in my initial filing. I claimed the credit but didn't use the specific "claim of right" terminology that Chad mentioned, and my employer documentation just says "bonus repayment required" rather than clearly establishing it was paid in error. What really strikes me from this thread is how important the exact language seems to be with the IRS on this relatively uncommon credit. I'm planning to file an amended return using the specific terminology and documentation approach that several people have outlined. One thing I'm curious about - has anyone dealt with a situation where the original payment was a bonus rather than regular salary? I'm wondering if there are any special considerations for bonus repayments under IRC 1341, or if the same rules apply regardless of the type of compensation that was overpaid. Thanks to everyone for sharing such detailed experiences - it's incredibly helpful to see what actually works with the IRS rather than just the general guidance in the publications!
I actually dealt with a bonus repayment situation under IRC 1341 about two years ago! The same rules generally apply regardless of whether it's salary, bonus, or other compensation - the key is establishing that you received the payment "under a claim of right" and later had to repay it when it was determined you weren't entitled to it. For bonus situations, you might actually have an easier time with the documentation since bonus eligibility requirements are usually more clearly defined in company policies. I'd suggest asking your employer for a letter that specifically references their bonus policy and states that you "were not eligible under company policy" and the payment was "made in error." This helps establish the legal basis for why you had no right to retain the money. The retention bonus angle actually strengthens your case since there are usually specific employment status requirements for those payments. If you can get documentation showing you had already given notice before the bonus criteria period, that clearly demonstrates the payment was erroneous. You're smart to amend using the proper terminology - I made similar mistakes initially and the difference in IRS response was night and day once I resubmitted with the "claim of right" language and proper IRC 1341 references. Good luck!
I've been dealing with a similar IRC 1341 situation and wanted to share what I've learned from working through it. My company accidentally continued my health insurance reimbursements for 4 months after I switched to my spouse's plan, totaling about $2,400 that I had to repay in 2024. What really helped me was following the documentation approach outlined in this thread. I made sure to get a letter from my employer's benefits department that specifically stated the reimbursements were "erroneously made under a claim of right" and that I "had no legal entitlement to receive these payments after changing coverage." The IRC 1341 calculation showed Method 2 would save me about $350 more than just taking a deduction, since I was in the 24% bracket when I received the payments but only 22% in the repayment year. One tip I'd add to what others have shared - if you're dealing with benefits overpayments rather than salary, make sure your employer documentation clearly references the specific policy that was violated. In my case, having the benefits administrator cite the exact section of our health plan that prohibited double coverage really helped establish that the original payments were made in error rather than just being a voluntary repayment. The IRS accepted my credit without additional questions when I used the specific terminology everyone here has recommended. This thread was incredibly valuable for understanding how to properly document and present an IRC 1341 claim!
This is really helpful information about benefits overpayments! I hadn't considered that the specific policy violation language could be so important. Your point about referencing the exact section of the health plan is brilliant - it creates a clear paper trail showing why the payments were erroneous rather than just discretionary. I'm curious about the tax bracket difference you mentioned (24% down to 22%). Even though that's a smaller spread than some of the other cases discussed here, you still came out $350 ahead with Method 2. That really demonstrates how the IRC 1341 credit can be beneficial even when the bracket difference isn't dramatic. For anyone else dealing with benefits-related repayments, Max's approach of getting the benefits administrator involved (rather than just HR or payroll) makes a lot of sense. They're more likely to understand the specific policy language needed to properly document why the payments were made in error. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's great to see another successful resolution using the documentation strategies discussed in this thread!
Join the conversation
This situation is definitely not normal, and your instincts are right to be concerned. As a W-2 employee, you should absolutely have access to your employer's EIN - it's required information for your tax filing. A few immediate steps I'd suggest: **First, determine your actual employment status.** If you're truly a W-2 employee, the EIN should be on your paystubs, and you should receive a W-2 by January 31st. The fact that it's missing from your paystubs and your employer is being evasive suggests you might actually be classified as a 1099 contractor, even if that wasn't made clear to you initially. **Document everything now.** Save all your paystubs, screenshot your direct deposits, and keep records of these conversations with your employer. If this turns into an IRS issue, you'll need proof of your employment and income. **Give them one final deadline.** Send a polite but firm email requesting your W-2 (if you're an employee) or 1099 (if you're a contractor) by the legal deadline of January 31st. This creates a paper trail. **Know your backup options.** If they don't provide proper documentation, the IRS can help you file Form 4852 (substitute W-2) or guide you through filing as a contractor. Don't let their non-compliance prevent you from filing your taxes properly. The bottom line is that legitimate employers don't behave this way. Whether there's intentional tax evasion or just poor record-keeping, you need to protect yourself and ensure you're filing correctly with the IRS.
This is really comprehensive advice, Jacob. The point about determining actual employment status first is crucial - I've seen so many people get caught off guard when they think they're W-2 employees but are actually being treated as contractors. @Skylar Neal - One thing that might help clarify your situation: look at how much control your employer has over your work. Do they set your schedule, tell you exactly how to do tasks, provide equipment, and restrict you from working elsewhere? If yes, you re'probably misclassified as a contractor when you should be an employee. If you have more freedom in how/when you work, you might legitimately be a contractor. The email documentation Jacob mentioned is spot-on. I d'also suggest keeping a simple log of when you ve'asked for this information and what responses you got. Even if it s'just Boss "avoided me again when I brought up W-2 -" dates and details matter if this escalates. Don t'let them make you feel like you re'being difficult. Getting proper tax documentation is your right, not a favor they re'doing you.
This is a concerning situation that unfortunately indicates your employer may not be handling payroll taxes properly. The EIN (Employer Identification Number) should definitely be visible on your paystubs if you're a legitimate W-2 employee - there's no valid reason to hide this information. Here's what I'd recommend doing immediately: **Check your actual employment classification.** The fact that there's no EIN on your paystubs and your employer is being evasive suggests you might actually be classified as a 1099 independent contractor rather than a W-2 employee, even if this wasn't clearly communicated to you when you were hired. **Gather all documentation now.** Save every paystub, screenshot your direct deposits, and keep records of all conversations about this issue. If you need to involve the IRS later, having this documentation will be crucial. **Send one final written request.** Email your employer requesting your proper tax forms (W-2 if you're an employee, 1099-NEC if you're a contractor) by the January 31st deadline. Be professional but clear that you need this to file your taxes legally. **Know your options if they don't comply.** The IRS has procedures for situations like this. You can file Form 4852 (Substitute for Form W-2) if you're supposed to be getting a W-2, or they can help guide you through proper filing as a contractor. Don't let their unprofessional behavior prevent you from filing your taxes correctly. The IRS deals with uncooperative employers regularly and has systems in place to help employees in your situation.
This is excellent advice, and I really appreciate how you've broken down the steps so clearly. I'm actually in my first year of working full-time and had no idea about a lot of this stuff. The point about checking my actual classification really hit home - looking back, I realize I never got any formal paperwork saying I was a W-2 employee. My boss just said "you'll be on payroll" when she hired me, but now I'm wondering if that actually meant something different than what I assumed. I'm definitely going to send that email request this week. Do you think I should mention anything about the IRS procedures in the email, or would that come across as too threatening? I don't want to make the situation worse, but I also need to get this resolved. Thanks for the reality check about not letting their behavior prevent proper filing - I was honestly starting to worry that maybe I was being too pushy about this.
Sofia Rodriguez
One thing that helped me with my eBay 1099-K was creating a simple spreadsheet to track everything. I made columns for: Item Sold, Sale Price, Original Cost (if I could remember/find receipts), eBay Fees, Shipping Cost, and whether it was a personal item or business inventory. The key insight I learned is that the IRS doesn't expect you to have perfect records for personal items you bought years ago. If you sold old clothes, electronics, or household items at a garage sale price, you can reasonably estimate the original cost. For example, if you sold a jacket for $25 that you originally bought for $80, that's clearly a non-taxable personal loss. Just make sure your estimates are reasonable and conservative. The IRS is more concerned with people not reporting obvious business income than they are with someone who sold their old iPhone for less than they paid for it. Document your reasoning and keep any receipts you do have - even credit card statements showing when you bought something can help establish the original cost.
0 coins
Cedric Chung
•This spreadsheet approach is really smart! I'm just getting started with organizing my eBay sales records and feeling overwhelmed. Quick question - for items where I genuinely can't remember what I paid (like old video games from years ago), is it okay to look up what similar items were selling for back then as a reasonable estimate? Or should I just be conservative and use current market value for similar condition items? I want to be honest but also don't want to accidentally create taxable income where there shouldn't be any.
0 coins
Ravi Choudhury
•Looking up historical prices is actually a great approach! You can use resources like eBay's "sold listings" (which shows completed sales from the past few months), PriceCharting for video games, or even old retail websites via the Wayback Machine to get a sense of what items cost when you originally bought them. The key is being reasonable and documenting your method. If you bought a game in 2018 and can find evidence it retailed for $60 then, that's a solid basis cost even if you sold it for $30 last year. I'd avoid using current market value as your cost basis since that could actually work against you - some collectibles have appreciated, so you might accidentally create taxable gain where there should be a loss. Stick with what you likely paid originally, or even be slightly conservative. The IRS guidance basically says they expect reasonable estimates for personal property when exact records aren't available. Just keep notes on how you determined each cost basis - "researched 2018 retail price via PriceCharting" or similar. That shows good faith effort if anyone ever questions it.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation but with a twist - I received 1099-Ks from both eBay and PayPal for the same transactions. Apparently this can happen when you use PayPal as your payment processor on eBay. From what I've researched, you should NOT double-report the same income. The key is to carefully review both forms and identify any duplicate reporting. Usually, if you're getting both, you'd report the eBay 1099-K (since that's the platform where the actual sales occurred) and then make a note or adjustment to avoid counting the PayPal 1099-K for the same transactions. Has anyone else run into this double-reporting issue? I'm worried about both under-reporting (if I ignore one form completely) and over-reporting (if I include both). The amounts don't match exactly either, which is making it even more confusing to figure out which transactions overlap. I'm thinking I might need to call the IRS about this specific situation since I haven't seen it addressed clearly in any of the standard guidance about 1099-K reporting.
0 coins