


Ask the community...
Just to summarize everything for Dylan and anyone else still confused - here's the simple breakdown: **401(k) through your employer:** - Already handled automatically through payroll - Pre-tax contributions reduce your taxable income (shown in W-2 Box 1) - No additional forms needed for your tax return - You'll see the total in Box 12 of your W-2 with code "D" **Separate IRA contributions ($2,500 in your case):** - Report on Schedule 1, Line 20 if it's a Traditional IRA - Subject to income limits since you have a workplace 401(k) - For 2025: phase-out starts at $78k (single) or $129k (married filing jointly) - You have until April 15, 2026 to make additional IRA contributions for tax year 2025 **Bottom line:** Your 401(k) is already taken care of, but you'll need to handle that $2,500 IRA contribution on your tax return if you want the deduction and you're under the income limits. The confusion is totally understandable since there are so many different retirement account types and rules. Focus on just these two pieces for your situation and you should be good to go!
This summary is incredibly helpful! As someone who just started contributing to retirement accounts this year, I was getting overwhelmed by all the different rules and forms. Your breakdown makes it so much clearer - I love how you separated the 401k (which is automatic) from the IRA (which requires action on my part). I have a similar situation to Dylan where I've been contributing to my employer's 401k all year, but I also opened a traditional IRA and put in about $3,000. I was panicking thinking I needed to report both somehow, but now I understand that only the IRA needs attention on my tax return. Quick follow-up question - when you mention the income limits for IRA deductions, is that based on my gross income or my adjusted gross income after accounting for things like my 401k contributions?
Great question about income limits! The IRA deduction phase-out is based on your Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI), not your gross income. The good news is that your 401(k) contributions reduce your MAGI since they're pre-tax. So if your gross salary is $85,000 but you contributed $8,000 to your 401(k), your MAGI would be around $77,000 (before other adjustments). Since the phase-out for singles starts at $78,000, you'd likely qualify for the full traditional IRA deduction on that $3,000 contribution. MAGI includes your AGI plus certain deductions that were added back in (like student loan interest), but for most people it's pretty close to their AGI. You can find your AGI on line 11 of Form 1040 after all the standard deductions and retirement contributions are factored in. The key takeaway is that your 401(k) contributions actually help you stay under the income limits for IRA deductions, which is a nice bonus!
This thread has been incredibly educational! As someone who's been procrastinating on filing taxes because of similar confusion, I finally feel like I understand the basics. I've been contributing to both a 401k and a traditional IRA, and like many others here, I was completely lost about what needed to be reported where. The key insight for me was learning that 401k contributions are already "baked into" your W-2 - I had no idea that Box 1 was already reduced by my contributions. I kept looking for some separate form to report them on. One thing I'm still curious about though - if I contributed to both a traditional IRA and a Roth IRA during 2025 (split my contributions between both), do I need to report both on different forms, or just the traditional IRA on Schedule 1? I put $2,000 in traditional and $1,500 in Roth, staying under the $7,000 total limit. Also, for anyone else who found the tax software confusing, I ended up calling my IRA provider (Fidelity) and they were able to walk me through exactly how my contributions should be reported. Sometimes the investment companies have tax specialists who can clarify these account-specific questions better than generic tax software.
This has been an absolutely fantastic deep dive into partnership guaranteed payments and S-Corp holding companies! As someone who's been researching multi-entity structures for months, this thread has answered questions I didn't even know I had. I wanted to add one consideration that might be helpful for others - the impact of state-specific LLC charging order protections when you convert single-member LLCs to partnerships. Some states have stronger asset protection for single-member LLCs than multi-member structures, so adding the S-Corp as a partner could potentially weaken your asset protection, even though it improves the tax situation. Also, for those worried about the complexity and compliance costs, I've found that using a centralized accounting system that can handle multi-entity reporting makes a huge difference in managing the ongoing administrative burden. The initial setup is definitely complex, but once the systems are in place, the quarterly reporting and tax prep becomes much more manageable. One question for the group - has anyone dealt with foreign partnership reporting requirements (Form 8865) if the S-Corp holding company owns interests in partnerships that have foreign partners or operations? I'm wondering if this adds another layer of complexity that could impact the cost-benefit analysis. The documentation and business substance points everyone's made are spot-on. I'm definitely planning to establish formal management services agreements and maintain detailed records from day one rather than trying to create documentation after the fact.
@Daniel Rivera, you've brought up some really important considerations that add even more depth to this already comprehensive discussion! The asset protection point is crucial and something I think gets overlooked when people focus solely on tax benefits. You're absolutely right that converting from single-member to multi-member structures can impact charging order protections in certain states. I've seen situations where the tax savings were significant, but the reduced asset protection wasn't worth the trade-off, especially for high-risk professions. Your point about centralized accounting systems is spot-on too. I learned this the hard way - trying to manage multiple entities with separate QuickBooks files was a nightmare. Once I moved to an integrated system that could handle consolidated reporting across all entities, the ongoing management became much more reasonable. The upfront investment in proper systems definitely pays for itself. Regarding Form 8865 requirements, that's definitely another complexity layer that could impact the analysis. If your partnerships have any foreign components - whether foreign partners, foreign operations, or even just foreign investments - you're looking at additional reporting requirements that most practitioners aren't familiar with. This could significantly increase your annual compliance costs and definitely requires specialized expertise. The formal management services agreements you mentioned are absolutely critical. I'd also recommend establishing regular board meeting schedules for the S-Corp and maintaining minutes that document strategic decisions and oversight activities. The IRS loves to see contemporaneous documentation of actual business activities rather than just tax-motivated structures. Has anyone in this thread dealt with the new beneficial ownership reporting requirements (FinCEN) for these multi-entity structures? That's another compliance layer we're all going to need to navigate starting this year.
This has been an incredibly comprehensive and educational thread! As someone who's been considering a similar holding company structure, I'm grateful for all the detailed insights shared here. One aspect I'd like to add that might be helpful for others considering this structure - the importance of timing the implementation carefully around your business cycle. If you have seasonal partnerships or businesses with irregular cash flows, you want to make sure the guaranteed payment amounts are sustainable throughout the year, not just based on peak earning periods. I'm also curious about how these structures interact with retirement plan contributions. If the S-Corp holding company becomes your primary source of W-2 wages (from the reasonable salary), does this impact your ability to make SEP-IRA or Solo 401(k) contributions from the partnership income? It seems like the guaranteed payments flowing to the S-Corp might change how you calculate earned income for retirement plan purposes. The documentation requirements everyone has discussed are clearly crucial. I'm planning to establish quarterly review meetings between the holding company and each partnership to create a paper trail of legitimate management oversight activities. Has anyone found particular types of management reports or strategic planning documents that work well for demonstrating the substantive business purpose of the guaranteed payments? Also, given all the state tax complexity mentioned throughout this thread, I'm wondering if it makes sense to start with a simpler structure initially and gradually add complexity as income grows, or if the setup costs make it better to implement the full structure from the beginning. Thanks again to everyone who's contributed their expertise here - this has been more valuable than any paid consultation I've had!
Previous tax returns also matter if you have any unused credits that can be carried forward. I learned this the hard way - had a big capital loss in 2022 that I could've been applying to offset gains for the next few years, but I forgot about it completely when I switched tax software in 2023! Cost me a few hundred in extra taxes.
Do you know if there's any way to fix this after the fact? I'm wondering if I might have missed something similar on my past returns.
You can absolutely fix this by filing an amended return! If you discovered you missed a carryover loss or credit from a previous year, use Form 1040-X to amend the return where you should have applied it. You generally have up to 3 years from the original filing date to submit amendments and claim refunds. It's definitely worth checking your old returns if you suspect you might have missed something. The most common missed carryovers are capital losses, business losses, excess charitable contributions, and certain tax credits that couldn't be fully used in a single year.
Your previous return can also flag potential audit triggers if there are big differences year to year. My income doubled between 2022 and 2023 and I got a letter from the IRS asking for documentation. Having my previous returns organized helped me respond quickly.
How far back should we keep our tax returns? I've heard everything from 3 years to forever.
I'm confused about the tax implications here. When the LLC sells chickens to the owner, isn't that income to the LLC that flows through to the owner anyway? Seems like you're just paying yourself and creating a wash transaction?
You're right that for a single-member LLC (which is a disregarded entity for tax purposes), the income ultimately flows to you on your Schedule C. However, this approach is still important for two reasons: First, it maintains the integrity of your business records and clearly separates business and personal transactions, which is crucial for liability protection of your LLC. Second, and more relevant to the original question, it allows you to maintain that the barn is 100% for business use, which affects depreciation and other business deductions. Without properly accounting for personal use, you might have to allocate a percentage of the barn as personal use, reducing your business deductions.
One thing to consider that hasn't been mentioned yet - make sure you're also thinking about the timing of these transactions. If you're taking chickens for personal use throughout the year, it's better to document and pay for them as you go rather than trying to do a bulk adjustment at year-end. Also, keep in mind that if your poultry business grows significantly, you might want to consider electing S-Corp status for your LLC. This could provide some tax advantages, but it would also change how these owner transactions need to be handled. Worth discussing with a tax professional if your business income gets substantial. The approach you're describing is solid - just make sure your "fair market value" pricing is reasonable and defensible. Use what you'd actually charge other customers, or what similar products sell for locally. The IRS likes to see consistency in how you value business assets and inventory.
Great point about timing! I'm actually just getting started with this approach and was wondering about the S-Corp election. At what income level does it typically make sense to consider that switch? My poultry business is still pretty small but growing steadily. Also, for establishing "fair market value" - would it be acceptable to use the prices from local farmers markets or grocery stores as a benchmark? I want to make sure I'm not undervaluing or overvaluing the chickens when I buy them from my own LLC.
Mateo Martinez
I messed this up last year and just paid the 6% excess contribution penalty becuz I didn't understand recharacterization. DON'T DO WHAT I DID! The penalty repeats every year until you fix it too. For what it's worth, I use Fidelity and when I finally called them about fixing it this year, they were super helpful. They walked me thru the recharacterization process over the phone. Their system automatically moves the proportional amount of earnings too, so I didn't have to calculate anything.
0 coins
Aisha Hussain
ā¢How much was the 6% penalty on your contribution? I'm wondering if it might be simpler to just pay it rather than doing all this recharacterization stuff. I'm only slightly over the income limit.
0 coins
Freya Larsen
ā¢The 6% penalty was $390 on my $6,500 contribution (6% of $6,500). But here's the kicker - that penalty applies EVERY YEAR the excess contribution stays in your account. So if I hadn't fixed it this year, I'd owe another $390 next year, and the year after that, etc. Even if you're only slightly over the income limit, the recharacterization is definitely worth doing. It's really not that complicated once you call your custodian - they handle most of the heavy lifting. Much better than paying recurring penalties!
0 coins
Ava Thompson
This is such a helpful thread! I'm in a similar boat - discovered I'm over the income limit after already contributing. One thing I want to add for anyone else going through this: make sure to check if your employer offers after-tax 401k contributions with in-service withdrawals. My HR department told me about this option which might be better than the backdoor Roth route depending on your situation. You can contribute way more than the IRA limits (up to $70k total including employer match for 2024), and if your plan allows it, you can roll the after-tax portion directly to a Roth IRA. Just another option to consider alongside recharacterization. Every situation is different but it's worth exploring all your retirement savings strategies when you're in the higher income brackets.
0 coins
Sofia Torres
ā¢That's a great point about the mega backdoor Roth! I hadn't considered that option. My company's 401k plan does allow after-tax contributions but I'm not sure about the in-service withdrawals. I'll need to check with HR about that. For someone who's just slightly over the Roth IRA income limit like me, would it make sense to do both - recharacterize this year's contribution AND set up the mega backdoor for future years? Or is there some reason you'd want to pick one strategy over the other? The contribution limits are definitely appealing if I can make it work with my plan's rules.
0 coins