IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This thread has been incredibly helpful and thorough! I'm actually in a very similar situation - moving in with my boyfriend next month and he owns the house. Reading through all these responses has really clarified the key decision points. Based on everything discussed here, it sounds like the expense-sharing approach is definitely the way to go for most couples in our situation. I love the practical suggestions about setting up expense categories, using automatic transfers with clear memo lines, and keeping simple monthly documentation. One question I haven't seen addressed - how do you handle it if one person wants to make improvements that the other doesn't care about? Like if I really want to upgrade the bathroom but he's fine with it as-is? Since he's the homeowner, I assume any improvements should come from him alone to avoid complicating the expense-sharing arrangement, but I'm curious how other couples have navigated those situations practically. The advice about getting everything documented and consistent from day one really resonates. We're going to sit down this weekend and map out exactly who pays what, create that simple written agreement several people mentioned, and set up the tracking system before I move in. Thanks everyone for sharing such detailed, real-world experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical guidance I needed!

0 coins

Dmitry Popov

•

Great question about handling improvements where only one person is interested! This is actually a pretty common situation, and from what I've seen work well for other couples, the key is keeping it simple and consistent with your expense-sharing arrangement. Since your boyfriend is the homeowner and will benefit from any equity increase, improvements should generally come from him alone - even ones you really want. However, you could offer to contribute to improvements that genuinely benefit both of you while living there (like that bathroom upgrade if you'll both be using it daily). Just make sure any contribution you make is reasonable and proportional, not covering the majority of an improvement that primarily benefits the homeowner's equity. Some couples handle this by having the non-owner "contribute" to improvements through temporarily covering a larger share of regular household expenses while the owner pays for the improvement. This keeps everything within the expense-sharing framework rather than creating a separate transaction that could complicate your tax situation. The most important thing is whatever you decide, document it clearly and make sure it fits the overall pattern of your expense-sharing arrangement rather than looking like separate rental or investment transactions. Your weekend planning session sounds like the perfect time to discuss how you'll handle these situations before they come up!

0 coins

Logan Scott

•

This thread has been absolutely fantastic - so much practical advice! I'm in the exact same situation as the original poster and was completely overwhelmed by the tax implications until reading through all these responses. The consensus around expense-sharing versus rental arrangements makes perfect sense, and I love all the specific implementation tips people have shared - the joint household account idea, expense categories, automatic transfers with clear memo lines, and the simple monthly documentation approach. One thing I'm still wondering about though is how to handle the transition period. I'm moving in with my partner in about 6 weeks, and she's currently paying all the housing expenses alone. Should we start the expense-sharing arrangement immediately when I move in, or is there some kind of grace period where we can figure out the logistics? I want to make sure we get the documentation and payment patterns established correctly from day one like several people emphasized. Also, for those who mentioned creating a simple written agreement - did you have yours reviewed by anyone (CPA, attorney) or just draft it yourselves? I'm trying to balance being thorough with not overcomplicating what should be a straightforward expense-sharing arrangement. Thanks again everyone for such detailed, helpful advice! This discussion has turned a confusing situation into a manageable one with clear next steps.

0 coins

Josef Tearle

•

Great question about the transition period! Based on my experience helping couples navigate this exact situation, I'd strongly recommend starting your expense-sharing arrangement immediately when you move in - don't wait for a grace period. The IRS looks for consistent patterns, and having a clear start date that coincides with when you actually begin living there creates the cleanest documentation trail. For the 6 weeks before you move in, use that time to set up all your systems - open the joint household account if you're going that route, decide on your expense categories and who pays what, set up the automatic transfers, and create your tracking spreadsheet. That way on day one you can hit the ground running with proper documentation from the start. Regarding the written agreement, most couples I work with draft something simple themselves using the guidance from threads like this one. You don't need formal legal review for a basic expense-sharing agreement between domestic partners - just a clear document outlining who pays what actual expenses. Save the attorney fees for if you decide to go the formal rental route instead. The key elements to include: clearly state this is expense sharing between domestic partners (not rent), list who pays which specific expenses, note that contributions are based on actual costs not fixed amounts, and date it to start when you move in. Keep it simple but clear - you're documenting your intent to share household expenses as a couple, not creating a landlord-tenant relationship.

0 coins

Kaitlyn Otto

•

The key thing everyone needs to understand is that nominee relationships must be legitimate from the start - you can't retroactively create them for tax purposes. As a newcomer here, I've been reading through all these responses and wanted to add that the IRS has specific documentation requirements for nominee situations. You need to show: 1) Legal ownership of the assets (title documents, gift records, trust agreements) 2) Who provided the funds to purchase the investments 3) Who has actual control and decision-making authority 4) A clear paper trail showing the relationship existed before any tax reporting For Emma's original question about shifting income to her brother - this won't work because you own the account and the investments. The nominee concept only applies when someone receives income that legally belongs to someone else, not when you want to reassign your own income for tax savings. If you're genuinely dealing with a situation where you received 1099 forms for income that belongs to someone else, make sure you have all the documentation ready before filing anything. The IRS takes these situations seriously and will want proof that the nominee relationship is legitimate.

0 coins

Thank you for that comprehensive breakdown! As someone new to this community, I really appreciate how you've summarized all the key points from this discussion. The documentation requirements you listed are especially helpful - I had no idea the IRS required such detailed proof for nominee situations. Your point about not being able to retroactively create nominee relationships is crucial. It sounds like a lot of people might get into trouble thinking they can restructure things after the fact just to save on taxes. The emphasis on having legitimate relationships from the start makes total sense from the IRS perspective. This whole thread has been really educational about the difference between legitimate nominee reporting (where someone receives income that actually belongs to someone else) versus trying to artificially shift income around for tax benefits. Definitely cleared up a lot of confusion for me!

0 coins

As someone new to this community, I want to thank everyone for this incredibly detailed discussion! I came here with similar confusion about nominee situations after inheriting some stocks that are still titled in my late grandfather's name but generating 1099 forms to his estate. Reading through all these responses has really clarified the difference between legitimate nominee scenarios (like mine, where I'm receiving tax documents for assets that legally belong to the estate) versus trying to create artificial arrangements to shift tax liability. The documentation requirements that Kaitlyn mentioned are spot-on - I've been working with an estate attorney and we have all the probate documents, death certificates, and inheritance records that show the legitimate ownership trail. It's reassuring to know that proper documentation makes these situations straightforward to resolve with the IRS. For anyone else dealing with nominee issues, the key takeaway seems to be: if you legitimately received income that belongs to someone else, document everything thoroughly. But if you're trying to artificially reassign your own income for tax savings, that's not what nominee reporting is designed for and could get you into serious trouble. This community is a great resource for understanding these complex tax situations!

0 coins

Sara Unger

•

Does anyone know if TaxSlayer Pro is any good? It's way cheaper than the others mentioned and I'm on a tight budget starting out. Also wondering about liability - should I make friends/family sign something saying they're responsible for providing accurate info?

0 coins

I used TaxSlayer Pro last year and it was decent for basic returns but struggled with some business stuff. If you're doing Schedule C, rental properties, etc. I'd say go with Drake instead. And YES get them to sign something! I made a simple one-page letter stating they provided all info and reviewed the return before filing.

0 coins

Sara Unger

•

Thanks, that's really helpful! I think I'll invest in Drake then since I know my cousin's business return will be complicated. Good call on the liability letter too - I hadn't thought about that but it makes total sense to protect myself.

0 coins

Amy Fleming

•

Great discussion here! As someone who went through this exact situation a few years ago, I'd add a couple things. First, definitely get that PTIN - it's free and protects you legally. Second, consider getting Enrolled Agent (EA) credentials if you plan to do this regularly. It's not required for basic prep work, but gives you more credibility and allows you to represent clients before the IRS if issues come up. For software, I started with Drake Basic and it was perfect for handling the mix of personal, rental, and small business returns you're describing. The learning curve isn't too bad coming from an accounting background. Also, don't forget to track your own expenses for this side work - software costs, continuing education, office supplies, etc. are all deductible if you're doing this as a business activity (which the IRS might consider it to be given the service trades you mentioned). One last tip: set clear boundaries early about what you will and won't do. I learned the hard way that once you help someone, they expect you to be their permanent tax person and answer questions year-round!

0 coins

This is such a common confusion! I run a consulting business through my single-member LLC and went through the exact same thing last year. After 15+ years of putting my business name first, a new client's accounting department rejected my W9 and insisted on the personal name/business name format. I ended up calling my CPA to confirm, and they explained that while many vendors don't scrutinize the technical details, the IRS instructions have always been clear about this. The key thing to remember is that for tax purposes, you and your single-member LLC are essentially the same entity - that's why your personal name needs to be primary. What helped me was creating a standard W9 template with the correct format and keeping it handy for new clients. I also proactively sent updated W9s to my regular clients during the slow season to avoid any payment delays. Most didn't even notice the change, but it prevented future headaches with their accounting departments. Don't stress about the years of "incorrect" completion - as long as you were using the right EIN, the important tax reporting information was accurate.

0 coins

This is really helpful to hear from someone who went through the same experience! I'm curious - when you sent updated W9s to your existing clients, did any of them question the change or ask for an explanation? I'm worried about looking unprofessional after all these years of doing it the "wrong" way. Also, did your CPA mention anything about whether this affects how we should handle other tax forms for single-member LLCs? I want to make sure I'm not making similar mistakes elsewhere in my business documentation.

0 coins

Avery Flores

•

Most of my existing clients didn't even comment on the updated W9 - they just filed it away with their vendor records. The few who did notice were actually appreciative that I was being proactive about keeping my documentation current and compliant. As for other tax forms, your CPA was right to mention this extends beyond just W9s. For single-member LLCs taxed as sole proprietorships, you'll want to be consistent across all business documents. This includes how you complete vendor applications, contract signatures, and any other forms that ask for business entity information. The general rule is: when tax treatment is involved, your personal name should be primary since that's how the IRS views your business structure. I learned this lesson the hard way when I had to correct several vendor onboarding forms after getting my W9 situation sorted out. It's much easier to be consistent from the start than to go back and fix everything later!

0 coins

Kai Santiago

•

I've been dealing with this exact same issue! I'm a freelance graphic designer with a single-member LLC and just had a major client question my W9 completion last month. Like you, I'd been putting my business name on Line 1 for over a decade with no problems. After reading through all these responses, I went back and actually read the W9 instructions carefully (something I probably should have done years ago). Sure enough, it's right there in black and white - for single-member LLCs that are disregarded entities, the owner's name goes on Line 1. What's frustrating is that so many of us have been doing this incorrectly for years without anyone saying anything! But I guess as long as we were providing the correct EIN, the actual tax reporting was working fine. I've now updated my standard W9 and sent new copies to all my regular clients. Most didn't even acknowledge the change, but it gives me peace of mind knowing I'm finally doing it correctly. The last thing any of us need is payment delays because of paperwork technicalities. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences here - it's really helpful to know we're not alone in this confusion!

0 coins

This is such a helpful thread! I'm a new single-member LLC owner (started my graphic design business 3 months ago) and was completely confused about the W9 situation. Reading through everyone's experiences has been really reassuring. I've been doing exactly what the original poster described - personal name on line 1, business name on line 2, using my SSN - but I was second-guessing myself when clients started asking questions about payment processing. It's good to know this is the correct approach. The idea of creating an educational document to send with W9 forms is genius! I'm definitely going to put together something similar. Has anyone found that getting an EIN later (even as a single-member LLC) caused any complications with existing client relationships, or is it pretty straightforward to transition mid-year if you decide to go that route? Also really appreciate the practical tips about invoice wording - small details like that can prevent so much confusion down the line.

0 coins

Eva St. Cyr

•

Welcome to the single-member LLC club! You're definitely on the right track with your W9 approach. Regarding transitioning to an EIN mid-year, it's actually pretty straightforward from what I've seen with other freelancers in my network. You'd just need to send updated W9 forms to your existing clients with the new EIN, and they'll use that for any future 1099s. For payments already received using your SSN earlier in the year, those 1099s will come with your SSN, while later payments will show your EIN - but since you're filing everything on the same Schedule C anyway, it all reconciles perfectly. The main thing is just communicating the change clearly to clients so they know to update their vendor files. Most are pretty understanding once you explain it's just a business administrative update. I'd probably wait until you have a natural break point (like the start of a new project) rather than switching mid-project to avoid any payment processing delays. You're smart to think about these details early - it's so much easier to establish good systems from the start rather than trying to fix confusion later!

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

Great thread! As someone who's been running a single-member LLC for 4 years now, I can confirm that all the advice here is solid. I wanted to add one more perspective that might help newcomers avoid some pitfalls I experienced. When I first started, I made the mistake of being inconsistent with how I presented my business information to different clients. Some got W9s with just my personal name, others got the full LLC setup, and it created a mess during tax season. The key is consistency - pick one approach (personal name + business name + SSN like you're doing) and stick with it for ALL clients. Also, I've found it helpful to have a brief conversation about payment processing during the initial client onboarding. I explain upfront that I'm a single-member LLC taxed as a sole proprietor, so payments can go to either name, but the important thing is using the correct tax ID. Most clients appreciate the transparency and it prevents awkward conversations later when they're trying to cut checks. One last tip: keep really good records of which clients paid using which name format. Even though the IRS systems can handle it, having your own documentation makes tax prep much smoother and gives you confidence if any questions come up later. A simple spreadsheet tracking client, payment method, and name used has saved me hours during tax season.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of real-world advice I needed! I'm only 6 months into my single-member LLC journey and already seeing how important consistency is. Your point about having that upfront conversation during client onboarding is spot-on - I've been waiting until payment time to explain the LLC structure, which just creates confusion when they're trying to process invoices. The spreadsheet tracking idea is brilliant too. I've been keeping basic income records but not noting which name format each client used for payments. I can already see how that's going to be a headache when I'm trying to match up 1099s in January. Definitely setting up that tracking system this week. One quick question - when you have that initial conversation with clients about payment processing, do you find they have a preference for personal name vs. business name on checks? I'm curious if most clients lean one way or the other, or if it really just comes down to their internal accounting processes.

0 coins

Prev1...12551256125712581259...5643Next