IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls โ€“ which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Liv Park

โ€ข

As a tax professional who has handled several similar cases, I want to emphasize something that hasn't been fully addressed yet - the importance of timing your consultation strategically. Since you're dealing with a 2024 settlement that needs to be reported on your 2024 return, you'll want to get professional guidance soon even if you file an extension. One key issue I've seen in estate malpractice cases is when the settlement compensates for assets that would have received a stepped-up basis at death but didn't due to the attorney's errors. If your parents' estate included appreciating assets that should have passed to you with a stepped-up basis but didn't due to the malpractice, the settlement might need to be analyzed under different rules than a simple inheritance recovery. Also, make sure your tax professional coordinates with your malpractice attorney before finalizing any position. I've seen cases where well-meaning attorneys structured settlements in ways that created unnecessary tax complications because they didn't consider the tax implications upfront. Getting both professionals working together now could potentially save you thousands in taxes if any adjustments to the settlement characterization are still possible. Document everything thoroughly - the IRS tends to scrutinize large settlements, especially those involving estate matters where the tax treatment isn't immediately clear from standard forms.

0 coins

Sofia Ramirez

โ€ข

This is exactly the kind of expert insight I was hoping to see in this discussion! The point about stepped-up basis complications for appreciating assets is particularly important - I hadn't fully considered how the malpractice might have affected the basis treatment of different types of assets in the estate. Your suggestion about coordinating between the tax professional and malpractice attorney is really valuable too. It sounds like there might still be opportunities to clarify or even adjust how the settlement is characterized if we act quickly enough. Given that we're still relatively early in the tax year, there might be some flexibility to optimize the tax treatment before everything is finalized. The documentation point is well-taken - with a settlement this size involving estate matters, we definitely want to be prepared for potential IRS scrutiny. Having clear professional guidance and documentation from the start will be much better than trying to reconstruct the reasoning later if questions arise. I'm definitely convinced about getting both professionals involved sooner rather than later. Thanks for the practical advice from someone who has actually handled these types of cases before!

0 coins

Liam Duke

โ€ข

I've been following this comprehensive discussion as someone who works in estate administration, and I wanted to add a few practical considerations that might help as you move forward with professional guidance. One thing that caught my attention is the 2-year duration of your legal ordeal. This extended timeframe could actually work in your favor for tax planning purposes. If you can demonstrate that the settlement compensates for investment income or asset appreciation you lost during those two years due to delayed asset distribution, you might be able to argue for capital gains treatment on that portion rather than ordinary income treatment. Also, since you mentioned this involved multiple beneficiaries and a court dispute, make sure your tax professional understands whether the settlement covers just your individual losses or if it's meant to compensate the estate as a whole. Sometimes malpractice settlements get structured to flow through the estate first, which can change the tax analysis completely. One final thought - if your parents' estate included any retirement accounts (401k, IRA, etc.) that were affected by the malpractice, the tax treatment of settlement amounts compensating for those losses could be significantly different due to the special rules governing inherited retirement accounts. These accounts don't get stepped-up basis and have their own distribution requirements that could complicate the settlement analysis. The coordination between your malpractice attorney and tax professional that others mentioned is really crucial here. There are often multiple ways to characterize the same settlement for tax purposes, and getting it right the first time is much easier than trying to fix it later.

0 coins

Tyrone Johnson

โ€ข

Great question! Yes, you absolutely need to maintain a mileage log even when your vehicle is primarily used for business. The IRS requires documentation to support any business vehicle deductions, regardless of the percentage of business use. However, your approach of tracking the rare personal trips could work! This is called the "adequate records" method where you document total annual mileage and subtract personal use. Just make sure you: 1) Record your odometer reading at the beginning and end of each year 2) Keep detailed records of every personal trip (date, destination, mileage, purpose) 3) Have supporting documentation for your business travel (client appointments, receipts, etc.) Since you're already meticulous with receipts and expenses, you're on the right track. Consider using a mileage tracking app like MileIQ or Everlance to make logging easier - they can automatically detect trips and you just categorize them as business or personal. One important note: once you choose between the standard mileage rate or actual expense method for a vehicle, you generally need to stick with that method for the life of the vehicle. Given that you're tracking all actual expenses already, make sure to calculate which method gives you the better deduction before deciding!

0 coins

Alana Willis

โ€ข

This is really helpful advice! I'm new to tracking business expenses myself and had the same confusion about mileage logs. Quick question - when you mention calculating which method gives better deductions, is there a general rule of thumb for when actual expenses beat the standard mileage rate? I drive an older car that needs frequent repairs, so I'm wondering if actual expenses might work better in my situation. Also, do you know if there are any good calculators online that can help compare the two methods before you commit to one? @Tyrone Johnson thanks for breaking this down so clearly - the adequate "records method" sounds much more manageable than logging every single business trip!

0 coins

Ethan Moore

โ€ข

@Alana Willis Great question about when actual expenses beat standard mileage! Generally, actual expenses work better when you have an expensive vehicle, high maintenance costs, or significant depreciation. For older cars with frequent repairs like yours, actual expenses often come out ahead. A few rules of thumb: if your actual costs per mile exceed the current standard rate 67ยข (for 2024 ,)actual expenses usually win. Also, luxury vehicles, trucks, or cars with expensive insurance tend to benefit more from actual expenses. For calculators, the IRS doesn t'provide one, but many tax software programs can run the comparison. You could also create a simple spreadsheet: track your actual expenses for a few months, divide by business miles driven, and compare that per-mile cost to the standard rate. Just remember - you need to decide by your tax return filing deadline for the first year you use the vehicle for business, and you re'generally locked into that method for the vehicle s'lifetime. So it s'worth doing the math carefully upfront! @Tyrone Johnson s advice'about the adequate records method is spot-on too - much more practical than logging every single trip when your car is mostly business use.

0 coins

Miguel Diaz

โ€ข

I'm dealing with a very similar situation! I run a freelance graphic design business and my car is probably 90% business use since I meet clients all over the region. I've been stressing about the mileage log requirement too. After reading through all these responses, I think I'm going to try the approach of tracking just my personal miles and using that to calculate my business percentage. It seems much more manageable than trying to log every single client visit. One question though - has anyone here actually been through an audit with this method? I'm curious how the IRS actually reviews these records in practice. The idea of having to justify every trip sounds terrifying, but if the documentation is solid it should be fine, right? Also, for those using apps like MileIQ - do you find it drains your phone battery significantly? I'm on the road a lot and battery life is always a concern.

0 coins

Marcus Marsh

โ€ข

@Miguel Diaz I haven t'been through an audit myself, but I can share what I ve'learned from tax professionals about this method. The key is having solid supporting documentation beyond just the mileage log - things like client contracts, appointment calendars, invoices, and receipts from business locations really strengthen your case. Regarding the IRS review process, they re'typically looking for patterns that make sense. If you claim 90% business use, they want to see that your personal trips align with that percentage and that your business travel is reasonable for your type of work. Having consistent, detailed records of those personal trips you do track is crucial. For the MileIQ battery concern - I ve'been using it for about 6 months and haven t'noticed significant battery drain, but I do keep a car charger just in case. The automatic trip detection is really convenient for someone like you who s'constantly traveling to different client locations. You might also want to look into apps like Everlance or TripLog as alternatives - some people find they work better with their specific phone models. The peace of mind from having proper documentation is definitely worth the small hassle of setting up a tracking system!

0 coins

Omar Zaki

โ€ข

Did you use one of those rewards apps or digital coupons? Sometimes the receipt shows the original price but the discount is applied after and the tax is calculated on the pre-discount amount. Makes it look like the tax percentage is higher than it actually is if you're calculating based on the final price.

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

โ€ข

This happened to me at CVS! The receipt showed a $5 discount from their ExtraCare program but the tax was calculated before the discount. Made it look like I was paying like 12% tax when it was actually the normal amount.

0 coins

I work in retail tax compliance and see this issue more often than you'd think. A 14% effective tax rate on a convenience store purchase in California is definitely wrong - even in the highest-tax jurisdictions like parts of LA County, you shouldn't see more than about 10.25% total. Here's what likely happened: Either their POS system has the wrong tax table programmed for your location, or there's a glitch where it's double-taxing certain items. Sometimes when stores update their systems or change locations within tax districts, the tax rates don't get updated properly. I'd recommend going back with your receipt and asking to speak with a manager. Most chain stores have corporate policies about fixing tax errors and will refund the difference once they verify the mistake. If they won't help, definitely file a complaint with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration - they have an online form for reporting businesses that aren't collecting the correct tax amounts. Also keep that receipt! If this is a systematic error affecting multiple customers, you might be helping identify a bigger issue that needs to be corrected across multiple locations.

0 coins

Vera Visnjic

โ€ข

This is super helpful! I'm pretty new to understanding tax stuff and didn't realize stores could have their systems programmed wrong like that. Quick question - when you say "file a complaint with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration," is that something they actually follow up on? Like, do they investigate individual stores or is it more of a general reporting thing? I'm wondering if it's worth the effort for a couple dollars or if I should just avoid that store in the future.

0 coins

Freya Thomsen

โ€ข

Has anyone had issues with the age verification part? My son turned 17 in December and the system is counting him as 17 for the whole tax year even though he was 16 for 99% of the year. Seems unfair that if your kid's birthday is January 2nd they count for the credit but December 31st they don't.

0 coins

Omar Fawaz

โ€ข

Unfortunately that's just how the tax law works. The IRS only cares about the age on December 31st of the tax year. My daughter turned 17 on December 28th and I lost the full $2,000 credit for her. But don't forget you can still claim the $500 Credit for Other Dependents!

0 coins

Another thing to check is whether you accidentally entered any of your children as "qualifying relatives" instead of "qualifying children" - this is a common mistake that can zero out your child tax credits. In most tax software, there's usually a section where you specify the relationship and dependency status. If a child is marked as a "qualifying relative" rather than a "qualifying child," they won't be eligible for the Child Tax Credit even if they meet all other requirements. Also, double-check that you didn't accidentally enter any of their birthdates as being in the wrong year. I've seen people accidentally enter 2008 instead of 2018 for a child's birth year, which would make the software think the kid is way older than they actually are. Given that you found the solution (the dependent checkbox issue), this might help others who run into similar problems but don't have that specific issue.

0 coins

Need help! Discovered undisclosed foreign accounts - FBAR/Form 8938 filing questions

I'm starting to panic a bit here. I've been living in the US for several years as a resident alien (green card holder) and have been filing my taxes regularly, but I just discovered something that's got me worried. Apparently I have a foreign investment account that I completely forgot about. When I moved to the US for work about 5 years ago, I left behind a government savings account in my home country (Singapore) that my grandparents had set up for me. I honestly forgot it existed until my mother called recently to tell me it had accumulated around $19,000 USD. From what I understand after frantically researching, this seems to be below the Form 8938 threshold ($50,000) but I definitely should have been filing FBARs all this time. This account earns about $1,200 in interest annually and is tax-exempt in Singapore, but I know the US still taxes worldwide income. What's my best approach here? Can I just file the FBAR for this year going forward or am I going to face serious penalties for the previous missed years? The account isn't huge but definitely above the FBAR reporting requirement. Is the IRS likely to come after me for this honest mistake? Also, how exactly do I report the foreign interest income on my tax return? Is there a specific form beyond the FBAR? I've been using FreeTaxUSA for my returns if that helps with specific guidance. I'm really stressed about this and would appreciate any advice!

Royal_GM_Mark

โ€ข

I went through almost the exact same situation about 2 years ago with a forgotten investment account in Canada that my parents had opened for me. The stress was overwhelming at first, but I want to reassure you that this is more common than you think and very manageable. Here's what worked for me: I filed all 6 years of delinquent FBARs using the IRS procedure mentioned by others here, and amended my last 3 tax returns to include the unreported interest income. The total additional tax I owed was only about $800 across all years, plus some interest - way less scary than I had imagined. The key was being proactive. I included a simple reasonable cause statement explaining that I genuinely forgot about the account after immigrating and was filing voluntarily once I discovered the requirement. No penalties were assessed, just the additional tax and interest. One practical tip for FreeTaxUSA: when entering the foreign interest, make sure you have the exact dates and amounts for each year. I had to contact my Canadian bank to get detailed statements going back several years, but they were helpful once I explained it was for tax compliance purposes. Don't let the anxiety consume you - take action now and you'll likely find the resolution much smoother than you're imagining. The IRS really does treat voluntary disclosures more favorably than discoveries during audits.

0 coins

Mei Chen

โ€ข

This is really reassuring to hear from someone who went through the exact same process! The $800 total additional tax across all years is way less than I was fearing. Can I ask - when you contacted your Canadian bank for the historical statements, did they charge fees for going back that many years? And did you need any special documentation to prove the account was yours, or was your standard ID sufficient? I'm worried about the logistics of getting proper documentation from my Singapore bank since I haven't had contact with them in years.

0 coins

Katherine Shultz

โ€ข

The bank fees were minimal - my Canadian bank (TD) charged about $25 for statements going back 6 years, which was totally worth it for the peace of mind. For documentation, my standard government-issued ID was sufficient since the account was in my name, though I did have to answer some security questions about account history. For Singapore banks, I'd recommend starting with a phone call to their international customer service line - most major Singapore banks (DBS, OCBC, UOB) have pretty good English-speaking support for overseas customers. Explain that you need historical statements for US tax compliance purposes. You might need to provide some form of ID verification, but they're usually helpful once they understand it's for legitimate tax reporting. If phone calls don't work, try reaching out through their secure online messaging systems or even visiting a branch if you have any upcoming travel plans. The key is being upfront about needing the records for tax compliance - banks are generally cooperative when it's for legitimate regulatory purposes rather than just curiosity. One tip: before contacting them, try to remember any details you can about the account (approximate opening date, any family members who might be co-signers, etc.) as this will help them locate the account more quickly.

0 coins

Emily Thompson

โ€ข

I completely understand the panic you're feeling - I went through something very similar when I discovered an old savings account in Australia that my parents had opened for me as a child. The good news is that your situation is actually quite straightforward to resolve, and the amounts involved work in your favor. Since you're being proactive about this discovery, you're in the best possible position. The IRS has specific procedures for exactly your situation called "Delinquent FBAR Submission Procedures" for people who genuinely didn't know about the requirement. Here's what I'd recommend: **For the FBARs:** File electronically for all years you should have filed (likely all 5 years you've been in the US). Include a brief statement explaining you genuinely forgot about the account after immigrating and are filing voluntarily upon discovery. **For your tax returns:** You'll need to amend the last 3 years to report the Singapore interest income. In FreeTaxUSA, go to Income โ†’ Interest โ†’ Foreign Interest Income. Make sure to convert the Singapore dollars to USD using the IRS yearly average exchange rates. **The reality check:** With $1,200 annual interest income, your additional tax liability will be relatively modest - probably a few hundred dollars per year plus interest. Since this is clearly non-willful (honest mistake), penalties are unlikely if you file before they contact you. The key is acting now while this is still a voluntary disclosure. Don't let anxiety delay action - that's the only thing that could make this situation worse. You've got this!

0 coins

Prev1...12521253125412551256...5643Next