IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I'm so deeply sorry for your family's loss, Aisha. Losing someone unexpectedly is incredibly difficult, and it's truly heartwarming to see how your community rallied together to support your aunt during this time. This thread has been absolutely invaluable - I've learned so much about GoFundMe tax implications that I never knew before. The consistent message from everyone with experience is reassuring: memorial fundraisers like yours are considered gifts, not taxable income, regardless of hitting the $15k 1099-K reporting threshold. What I find most helpful is how this discussion evolved beyond just answering the tax question to providing a complete roadmap for proper documentation. Mohamed's update about organizing everything in a spreadsheet really shows how all the advice comes together into actionable steps. The idea of keeping campaign page screenshots alongside expense receipts creates such a clear paper trail showing the charitable purpose. As someone who might need to organize something similar in the future (unfortunately, we all face unexpected losses), I'm bookmarking this entire conversation. The resources people shared for getting direct IRS guidance and tax help seem particularly valuable for anyone feeling overwhelmed by the technical aspects. Your cousin clearly touched many lives - 270 donors is a beautiful testament to their impact. Thank you for asking this question and sharing your journey. It's going to help countless families navigate similar situations while they're grieving.

0 coins

I'm also deeply sorry for your loss, Aisha, and I want to echo everything Keisha said about how valuable this discussion has become. As someone new to this community, I'm genuinely amazed by the depth of knowledge and compassion everyone has shown. What really stands out to me is how this thread demonstrates the power of community support in multiple ways - first through the original 270 donors who contributed to the memorial fund, and now through all the detailed guidance shared here to help navigate the tax implications. It's beautiful to see people helping during both the emotional and practical aspects of loss. The clarification that memorial fundraisers maintain their gift status regardless of the dollar amount is so important. I had always assumed that hitting certain thresholds automatically created tax obligations, but now I understand that the $15k threshold is purely for IRS reporting - it doesn't change the fundamental nature of charitable gifts. Mohamed's systematic approach to documentation with the spreadsheet and campaign screenshots is brilliant. It creates such a clear record that these funds went toward their intended charitable purpose. This kind of organized approach seems like it would provide tremendous peace of mind if questions ever arose. Thank you all for creating this comprehensive resource. Your cousin's memory is being honored not just through the original fundraiser, but through how this discussion will help other families facing similar situations.

0 coins

Zainab Ismail

•

I'm so sorry for your family's loss, Aisha. Losing a loved one unexpectedly is one of life's most difficult experiences, and it's incredibly touching to see how your community came together to support your aunt during this time. As a newcomer to this community, I'm amazed by the comprehensive guidance that's been shared in this thread. The consistent message from everyone with direct experience - tax professionals, people who've been through similar situations, and even those who've spoken directly with IRS agents - is very reassuring: memorial fundraisers like yours are considered gifts, not taxable income, regardless of the amount raised. What I find particularly valuable is how this discussion has evolved into a complete practical guide. The documentation strategies that have been shared - keeping campaign screenshots, organizing receipts in spreadsheets, and maintaining clear records of how funds were used for legitimate funeral expenses - create such a solid foundation for proper reporting. The clarification that the $15k threshold is purely for IRS reporting purposes, not taxation, is something I didn't fully understand before reading through all these responses. It's comforting to know that community generosity during times of tragedy won't create additional financial burdens for grieving families. Your cousin clearly had a profound impact on many people - the fact that 270 individuals contributed speaks volumes about the kind of person they were. Thank you for asking this important question and sharing your experience. This thread will undoubtedly help many other families navigate similar situations in the future.

0 coins

I'm also very sorry for your loss, Aisha. As someone who's new to this community as well, I've been reading through this entire discussion with great interest and appreciation for how supportive everyone has been. What strikes me most about this thread is how it demonstrates that even in our most difficult moments, communities can come together not just with financial support, but also with knowledge and guidance. The 270 donors who contributed to your cousin's memorial fund, and now all the people who've shared their expertise here - it's really beautiful to witness. I had no idea before reading this that memorial fundraisers maintained their gift status regardless of hitting reporting thresholds. Like Zainab mentioned, I also assumed that certain dollar amounts automatically triggered tax obligations. Learning that the $15k threshold is purely administrative for 1099-K reporting, not taxation, is incredibly valuable information. The systematic documentation approach that Mohamed implemented based on everyone's advice really shows how practical all this guidance has been. Having that clear paper trail connecting the GoFundMe campaign purpose to actual funeral expenses creates such strong evidence of the charitable nature of the funds. Thank you for sharing this journey with us, Aisha. Your cousin's legacy is being honored not just through the original community support, but through how this discussion will help other families facing unexpected losses. This thread has become an invaluable resource that will surely help many people during some of their most challenging times.

0 coins

Elijah Knight

•

This whole discussion has been incredibly educational! I'm new to this community and have learned so much from reading through everyone's responses. The clarity around gift vs. income taxation is exactly what I needed to understand. I'm actually in a similar situation where my parents are considering helping with some debt, and this thread has been like a comprehensive guide to family gift taxation. The key points about documentation, potential 1099-C forms, and coordination with parents on Form 709 filing are all things I never would have thought about. What really stands out to me is how this community goes beyond just answering the basic tax question - people have shared practical implementation advice, insurance considerations, and even broader financial planning perspectives. Emma, you're so fortunate to have such generous parents, and it's clear you can move forward confidently knowing this won't create any unexpected tax burden for you. Thanks to everyone who shared their expertise and experiences. This is exactly the kind of knowledge sharing that makes complex financial decisions feel manageable instead of overwhelming!

0 coins

MidnightRider

•

Welcome to the community, Elijah! I'm also fairly new here and have been amazed by the depth of knowledge and willingness to help that everyone shows. This thread really has been like getting a masterclass in family gift taxation from multiple experts. What I found most helpful was how people explained not just the "what" but the "why" behind the tax treatment. Understanding that gifts aren't income because the economic benefit comes from the giver (not from debt forgiveness by a creditor) really helped me grasp the underlying logic. It makes the rules feel less arbitrary and more predictable. I'm curious about your parents' situation - are they considering something similar to Emma's mortgage payoff? After reading through all these responses, it seems like the same principles would apply whether it's mortgage debt, student loans, or other types of debt. The gift tax treatment remains consistent regardless of how the money gets used. One thing I'm definitely taking away from this discussion is the importance of proper documentation and thinking through all the downstream effects. It's so valuable when communities like this share both the technical knowledge and the practical implementation details that make the difference between understanding the theory and successfully navigating the real-world process.

0 coins

Daniel Rivera

•

This thread has been absolutely fantastic to read through! As someone who's been following this community for a while, I'm consistently impressed by the quality and depth of advice shared here. Emma, you've received incredibly solid guidance from everyone - this is definitely a gift situation, not taxable income to you. The peace of mind from understanding this correctly must be huge, especially when dealing with such a significant amount. What I particularly appreciate about this discussion is how it evolved beyond just the core tax question. The practical tips about documentation, potential 1099-C issues, insurance updates, and even the broader estate planning considerations show how thoughtful this community is about helping people navigate all aspects of these situations. For anyone else reading this who might face similar family gift scenarios in the future, this thread is like a comprehensive guide to everything you need to think about. The consistency of the responses really reinforces how well-established this area of tax law is. Emma, congratulations on having such generous parents and on becoming mortgage-free! Make sure to enjoy that feeling of true homeownership. And to everyone who contributed their expertise - thank you for creating such a valuable resource for the community!

0 coins

Miguel Diaz

•

This has been such an incredibly helpful thread to follow! As someone completely new to this community, I'm amazed by how generous everyone has been with their time and expertise. Emma, reading through your original question brought back memories of when I was in a similar position a few years ago. The anxiety about potential tax implications on such a large gift is totally understandable - nobody wants to be blindsided by a massive tax bill! But everyone here has given you rock-solid advice that this is clearly a gift, not income. What really impressed me about this discussion is how people went way beyond just answering your basic tax question. The insights about documentation, insurance changes, potential 1099-C forms, and even broader family financial planning considerations are exactly the kind of practical details that make the difference between theory and successful real-world implementation. Your parents are giving you such an incredible foundation for financial security. Being mortgage-free opens up so many opportunities for building wealth and pursuing other goals. Make sure to savor that first month when you don't have to make a mortgage payment - it's an amazing feeling! Thanks to everyone who shared their knowledge and experiences. This thread is going to be a fantastic resource for anyone facing similar family gift situations in the future.

0 coins

Omar Mahmoud

•

I've been helping expats with Form 1116 issues for several years now, and your situation is a textbook example of how the Foreign Tax Credit limitation works in practice. What you're experiencing isn't a bug - it's actually the system working as intended, though I completely understand why it feels backwards and frustrating. The core issue is that the FTC is designed to prevent "cross-crediting" - using foreign taxes paid on foreign income to offset US taxes owed on US-source income. Even though your UK tax rate is higher than the equivalent US rate, the limitation calculation on Line 19 ensures you can only credit foreign taxes up to the amount of US tax that would be owed specifically on that foreign income. Here's what I'd recommend checking: Look at Lines 1a through 8 on your Form 1116 and make sure you're correctly identifying what constitutes foreign-source income versus US-source income. Even small amounts of US interest, dividends, or other domestic income can significantly impact the limitation calculation. Also, double-check that you're properly calculating your foreign taxable income on Line 17 after accounting for the standard deduction. The good news is that any excess foreign tax credits carry forward for up to 10 years, so they're not wasted. If you continue earning foreign income in future years, you'll be able to use those credits. And if you move abroad permanently in the future, you might want to compare the FTC with the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion to see which gives you better tax results.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of expert explanation I needed! I've been going in circles trying to understand why paying MORE in foreign taxes seemed to result in LESS US credit. The concept of preventing "cross-crediting" finally makes it click for me. I went through Lines 1a-8 again with fresh eyes, and you're absolutely right about being careful with income classification. I had been thinking of my small US interest income as insignificant, but now I see how it affects the entire limitation calculation. One follow-up question: when you mention comparing FTC with FEIE for future years - is there a rule of thumb for when one is better than the other? I'm considering a permanent move back to the UK, and it would be helpful to know which strategy typically works better for higher foreign tax rate countries like the UK. Thanks for taking the time to break this down so clearly. It's frustrating that the IRS instructions don't explain the underlying logic behind these calculations!

0 coins

Great question about FTC vs FEIE! The general rule of thumb is that FEIE works better when your foreign tax rate is lower than the US rate, while FTC is usually better when your foreign tax rate is higher (like in the UK). With FEIE, you can exclude up to $126,500 (for 2024) of foreign earned income from US taxation entirely, but you lose the ability to claim foreign tax credits on that excluded income. This works great in low-tax countries, but in high-tax countries like the UK, you'd be "wasting" those high foreign taxes. Since the UK has higher tax rates than the US, FTC is typically the better choice because you can use those high UK taxes to offset your US tax liability. Even with the limitation issues you're experiencing now, the excess credits carry forward and can be used in future years. However, there are some situations where FEIE might still make sense even in high-tax countries - like if you have significant US-source income that's causing limitation problems, or if you're in the UK's 45% tax bracket and the math works out better. For a permanent UK move, I'd definitely run the numbers both ways for your first full year abroad. Many expat tax software programs can model both scenarios to see which gives better results.

0 coins

I've been following this thread with great interest as someone who's dealt with similar Form 1116 headaches. What really helped me understand the limitation calculation was realizing that Line 19 isn't trying to penalize you for paying high foreign taxes - it's actually protecting the US tax base. Think of it this way: the US wants to tax your worldwide income, but it also wants to be fair about double taxation. So the FTC lets you credit foreign taxes, but only against the US tax that would have been owed on that same foreign income. The ratio calculation ensures you can't use your UK taxes to wipe out US taxes owed on US-source income. In your case, that $1,750 you still owe is likely the US tax on your small amounts of US-source income (interest, etc.) plus any limitation effects. The system is working correctly - it's just not intuitive! One thing that might help for next year: consider timing when you realize US-source income if you have control over it. For example, if you have investments generating US dividends or interest, you might be able to minimize those during years when you have high foreign income to reduce the limitation effects.

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

This is such a helpful way to think about it! I've been banging my head against the wall trying to understand why the FTC limitation seemed so punitive, but framing it as "protecting the US tax base" rather than penalizing foreign taxpayers makes it much clearer. Your point about timing US-source income is really smart - I hadn't thought about that strategy. I do have some control over when I realize capital gains from US investments, so I could potentially time those for years when I have lower foreign income or when I'm fully US-resident. It's frustrating that none of this logic is explained in the IRS instructions. They just give you the formulas without explaining WHY the system works this way. Understanding the underlying policy rationale makes the whole thing much less maddening! Thanks to everyone in this thread for helping me finally wrap my head around Form 1116. I feel much more confident about filing now, even though I'm still not thrilled about owing that $1,750.

0 coins

Eli Butler

•

I just wanted to chime in as someone who's been through this exact situation! I had a 922 code appear on my 2019 transcript in 2022, also showing $0.00, and I was absolutely convinced I had made some terrible mistake on my return. After months of worry (and reading threads like this one), I eventually learned that mine was triggered by my bank submitting a corrected 1099-INT form. Apparently they had initially reported my interest income with the wrong account number or something technical like that, but the dollar amount was correct all along. When they submitted the correction, the IRS system automatically flagged it for review, but since my original return already had the right numbers, the review concluded with no changes needed. The key thing I learned is that the $0.00 amount really is your friend here - it means the IRS has already completed their investigation and determined everything checks out. If there was actually a problem, you would have received official mail by now AND the transcript would show an actual dollar amount owed. It's been almost 3 years since that code appeared on my transcript and I've never heard another word about it. These codes are just the IRS's way of keeping records of their internal reviews, even when those reviews find no issues. Hope this helps put your mind at ease!

0 coins

Thank you so much for sharing your experience! I'm actually going through the exact same thing right now - just found a 922 code on my 2020 transcript that appeared a few months ago, also showing $0.00. I've been losing sleep over it thinking I somehow messed up my taxes, but reading your story (and everyone else's in this thread) has been such a huge relief. Your explanation about the bank submitting a corrected 1099-INT with the wrong account number but correct dollar amount really helps me understand how these technical corrections can trigger reviews even when nothing was actually wrong with your return. It's crazy how something so minor on the bank's end can create such anxiety for us taxpayers when we see these mysterious codes pop up years later! The fact that it's been 3 years for you with no follow-up really reinforces what everyone else has been saying about the $0.00 amount being the key indicator that everything is resolved. I think I'm finally ready to stop panicking and just trust that the IRS has already done their job here. This thread has been incredibly valuable for understanding these codes - thank you for adding your voice to help reassure others dealing with the same situation!

0 coins

Amina Toure

•

I just wanted to add my experience to this incredibly helpful thread! I discovered a 922 code on my 2018 transcript about 6 months ago, also showing $0.00, and I was completely panicked thinking I had somehow failed to report income or made a major error on my return. Like so many others here, I only had straightforward W-2 income that year and everything matched perfectly between my tax documents and what I reported. I spent weeks agonizing over it, convinced I was going to get audited or owe back taxes with penalties. After reading through all these similar experiences, I'm finally understanding that these codes are actually quite routine! It sounds like the IRS has automated systems that flag potential discrepancies for review, but when the review is complete and shows $0.00, it means they've already determined everything was filed correctly. What really resonates with me is how many people mentioned third parties (employers, banks, etc.) submitting corrected forms years after filing. I had a small CD that matured in 2018, and I'm now wondering if my credit union submitted some kind of technical correction that triggered this review, even though the interest amount I reported was correct all along. The consistency across everyone's stories is remarkable - 922 codes appearing 1-3 years after filing, showing $0.00 amounts, and never leading to any actual problems or correspondence. It's clear these are just administrative records of completed reviews rather than active issues requiring attention. Thank you to everyone who shared their experiences - this thread has turned what felt like a tax crisis into understanding that this is just normal IRS bookkeeping!

0 coins

I'm so glad I found this thread! I just noticed a 922 code on my 2019 transcript last week and I was absolutely terrified that I had made some huge mistake. Reading everyone's experiences here has been incredibly reassuring - it sounds like these codes are way more common than any of us realized and are usually just routine administrative reviews. Like you and so many others, mine also shows $0.00 and I had a very straightforward tax situation that year. Your theory about the CD maturity possibly triggering a review makes total sense based on what others have shared about third-party corrections. I had a similar situation with a savings account that earned a small amount of interest, and now I'm wondering if my bank submitted some kind of technical correction that flagged it for review. What really puts my mind at ease is seeing the consistent pattern across all these stories - the codes appear years later, show $0.00, and never result in any actual problems or official correspondence. It's clear that if the IRS had found a real issue, we would have received formal notices by now and the transcript would show an actual amount owed rather than zero. Thank you for adding your experience to this thread - it's helped me realize I can stop panicking and trust that this is just normal IRS record-keeping for completed reviews that found no issues!

0 coins

A lower refund usually means you had more money in your paychecks throughout the year. Check your final pay stubs from both years and compare the net pay. Bet you'll find you were bringing home more per check this year! A refund is just you getting your own money back that you overpaid, it's not free money from the government lol

0 coins

Jayden Reed

•

This is so true! I adjusted my W-4 last year to have less withheld and my paychecks went up by like $80 each. My refund was tiny but I'd rather have that money throughout the year than give the government an interest-free loan.

0 coins

Cole Roush

•

I had almost the exact same thing happen to me! Expected around $2,000 and only got $750. After digging through everything, I found a few key things that changed between last year and this year: 1. My employer switched payroll companies mid-year and the new one used slightly different withholding calculations - even though my W-4 stayed the same, they were withholding about $15 less per paycheck. 2. I had a small amount of freelance income this year ($800) that I reported on a 1099, which pushed me just over a threshold for one of the tax credits I was getting last year. 3. The big one - last year I was still getting some pandemic-related tax benefits that expired. I didn't realize how much those were helping my refund until they were gone. My advice is to pull out last year's tax return and compare it line by line with this year's. Look especially at your credits section and any COVID-related items from last year. Also check if your employer changed anything about payroll - sometimes they don't announce small changes to withholding procedures. It's frustrating but you probably didn't actually pay more in taxes, you just got more money throughout the year in your paychecks instead of at refund time!

0 coins

Diez Ellis

•

This is really helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation and your point about employers switching payroll companies is something I hadn't considered. How did you figure out that your employer changed their withholding calculations? Did you have to ask HR directly or was there some way to tell from your pay stubs? I'm wondering if something similar happened to me since my company did mention some "system updates" earlier this year but I didn't think it would affect my taxes.

0 coins

Prev1...11951196119711981199...5643Next